Taxpayers Fleeing Democrat-Run States for Republican Ones

In 2013, more than 200,000 people on net fled states with Democrat governors for ones run by Republicans, according to an analysis of newly released IRS data by Americans for Tax Reform.
"People move away from high tax states to low tax states. Every tax refugee is sending a powerful message to politicians," said ATR President Grover Norquist. "They are voting with their feet. Leaders in Texas and Florida are listening. New York and California are not."
That year, Democrat-run states lost a net 226,763 taxpayers, bringing with them nearly $15.7 billion in adjusted gross income (AGI). That same year, states with Republican governors gained nearly 220,000 new taxpayers, who brought more than $14.1 billion in AGI with them.
Only one-third of states with Democrat governors gained taxpayers, compared to three-fifths of states with Republican governors.
Top 5 loser states for Democrat governors in 2013:
· New York (114,929 people with $5.7 billion in AGI)
· Illinois (68,943 people with $3.8 billion in AGI)
· California (47,458 people with 3.8 billion in AGI)
· Connecticut (14,453 people with $1.8 billion in AGI)
· Massachusetts (11,915 people with $1 billion in AGI)
Top 5 winner states for Republican governors in 2013:
· Texas (152,912 people with $6 billion in AGI)
· Florida (74,094 people with 8.3 billion in AGI)
· South Carolina (29,176 people with 1.6 billion in AGI)
· North Carolina (26,207 people with $1.5 billion in AGI)
· Arizona (16,549 people with $1.5 billion in AGI)
The single largest net migration from one state to another took place between New York and Florida (17,355 people).
More from Americans for Tax Reform
Biden Adviser: Change Constitution to Impose Wealth Tax

Heather Boushey, one of Joe Biden's picks for his Council of Economic Advisers, wants to impose a wealth tax and earlier this year suggested amending the Constitution in order to make it happen.
On Feb. 6, Boushey said:
“The United States [was] one of the first in the world to do a federal income tax. When we first passed it into law it was deemed unconstitutional and it took decades to change the constitution to have a federal income tax. We might need to do that again on a wealth tax."
A "wealth tax" is wrong on principle and unconstitutional. Article 1, Section 9, Clause 4 states: "No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration herein before directed to be taken."
Wealth taxes have proven so unworkable, and raise so little money, and chase so many people away that even Sweden and Denmark abolished their wealth taxes.
Wealth taxes were also repealed in The Netherlands, Austria, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Luxembourg, Ireland, and Italy.
Wealth taxes pushed by Democrats and left-leaning academics typically include an "exit tax" which even the Washington Post editorial board said "conveys a certain authoritarian odor."
Joe Biden is not exactly surrounding himself with "moderates."
Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore
New Hampshire Taxpayers Can Look Forward to Much Needed Tax Relief Under Republican Trifecta

After just two years of a Democrat-run General Court – and multiple efforts to raise taxes and destroy the New Hampshire Advantage, which were fortunately vetoed by Governor Chris Sununu – voters put Republicans back in charge of the Granite State. Now, the people of New Hampshire can look forward to some much-needed tax relief.
Going into Election Day, Democrats controlled the state Senate with a 14-10 majority and the state House with a 230-157 majority (13 seats were vacant). Democrats also had a 3-2 advantage on the Executive Council, which approves expenditures in the state budget and provides oversight for receipts and spending for state departments and agencies.
With those majorities, Democrats proposed a number of tax increases, including an income tax and a sales tax. They also tried to impose a variety of burdensome regulations, such as raising the cap on the state’s net metering program, which would have increased the cost of monthly energy bills.
Granite Staters clearly had enough of the liberal tax and spend agenda, and they showed it on November 3rd.
In addition to reelecting Gov. Sununu – one of 13 Governors who have signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge, a written commitment to New Hampshire taxpayers that he will oppose and veto any and all tax increases – for his third consecutive term, voters also handed both legislative chambers back over to the GOP. Republicans now control the state Senate with a 14-10 majority and the state House with a 229-171 majority. Buttressing this Republican trifecta, voters flipped the Executive Council to Republicans, with a 4-1 advantage.
“New Hampshire Republicans ran as a unified ticket that put New Hampshire first, and the result is an incoming Republican Majority in the Executive Council and both chambers at the State House,” tweeted Gov. Sununu. “I am pleased that Granite State voters rejected the DC style politics that had crept into the State House these last two years, and I am excited to get to work with our new Republican majorities to deliver results for the people of this state.”
Gov. Sununu is already showing the people of New Hampshire how Republicans will deliver results: Tax relief. On multiple occasions, Gov. Sununu has expressed strong support for reducing the meals and rooms tax and has also indicated that he would like to reduce other business taxes.
The New Hampshire meals and rooms tax is imposed on restaurants, hotels, and grocery stores that sell prepared food. Currently, the meals and rooms tax rate is 9% of the meal or room cost. Reducing this tax would be a huge win for New Hampshire’s tourism industry, which has been hit particularly hard by the forced shutdowns to slow the spread of the virus.
In addition to helping these struggling businesses, reducing the meals and rooms tax would actually be a win for all Granite Staters, as it would reduce the overall cost of purchasing food at restaurants and staying overnight in hotels, cabins, and other lodging facilities.
Gov. Sununu has also expressed interest in undoing Democrat-led increases to the tax Business Profits Tax (BPT) and Business Enterprise Tax (BET).
Prior to Democrats taking control of the General Court, the state’s BPT and BET rates were scheduled to be reduced in 2019 and 2021 thanks to a budget prepared by Republicans and Gov. Sununu in 2017.
The Democrats agreed to allow the 2019 tax cuts to take effect as planned, but made the 2021 tax cuts contingent upon two revenue triggers. The first trigger would have allowed the promised 2021 tax cuts to take effect if revenues had come in above a certain threshold. The second trigger would have increased the BPT and BET rates, effectively undoing the 2019 tax relief, if revenues had come in below a certain threshold.
While businesses across New Hampshire dodged the latter trigger – which would have resulted in them facing tax increases during the pandemic – the first trigger was not hit either. Now, because Democrats insisted on changing the law, New Hampshire taxpayers have been robbed of tax relief in 2021.
Fortunately, Gov. Sununu and Republicans in the General Court have expressed interested in reversing this tax hike and allowing the 2021 tax cuts to take effect as planned, regardless of revenue. This would result business across New Hampshire, who have already been making tough decisions over the past few months, having more money to invest in jobs, wages, and basic business operations.
Now that New Hampshire is totally controlled by Republicans, members of the House, Senate, and Executive Council can work with Gov. Sununu in providing much needed tax relief to the hard-working people across the Granite State.
Photo Credit: U.S. Department of Agriculture
More from Americans for Tax Reform
Potential COVID-19 Package Should Not Contain Bailouts Or Expanded Unemployment Payments

Lawmakers are in the process of negotiating the details of a new Coronavirus relief package.
While an agreement has not yet been reached, a recent $908 billion framework released by lawmakers in both parties contains two concerning provisions that should be removed from the final bill.
First, the current package contains $160 billion in bailout cash for state and local governments. Lawmakers should not use this crisis as an excuse to bail states out for past mistakes unrelated to the pandemic.
Congress has already provided funding for states and localities to be reimbursed for pandemic-related expenses. The CARES Act created the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF), a $150 billion fund to help state and local governments with unplanned pandemic-related expenses like testing, acquiring and distributing personal protective equipment, and payroll expenses for first responders and other essential employees.
Blue state lawmakers want to use new bailout money to shore up their mismanaged pension systems. In 2017, the state pension gap was $1.28 trillion. This means that states would need $1.28 trillion just for their pension systems to break even.
Federal bailouts in times of crisis have historically led to expansions in state spending, creating a moral hazard and disincentivizing decision-makers from being prudent stewards of taxpayer resources. Following a $20 billion federal bailout for state budgets after a market downturn in 2003, state spending rose by 33 percent in the subsequent five years and state debts increased by 20 percent in the following four years.
Second, the framework provides $300-per-week in additional unemployment payments through March. These payments are on top of regular unemployment compensation that displaced workers receive from states.
Expanding unemployment payments have historically kept Americans out of work. On the heels of the Great Recession, Congress and President Obama expanded unemployment several times, eventually topping out at 99 weeks of payments.
Analysts from the New York Federal Reserve estimated that the unemployment rate would have been 2.2 percentage points lower in 2011 and 3 percentage points lower in 2010 if Obama’s benefit expansion did not exist. This means that the disincentive to work the benefit expansion created kept approximately 4 million Americans out of a job during the slowest economic recovery in modern history.
Democrats are pushing to revive the Pelosi temporary $600-per-week federal pandemic unemployment compensation (FPUC) benefit. Before the FPUC expired in July, it created a situation in which 68 percent of Americans got paid more on unemployment than in the workplace.
The subsidy of welfare over work will have lasting impacts on the economy that will only worsen if brought back, either at the $300 or $600 level. A recent study conducted by the Heritage Foundation found that the FPUC will reduce GDP by between $955 billion and $1.49 trillion.
While workers who have been displaced by the pandemic deserve a safety net, expanding these payments will endanger our economic recovery and discourage Americans from safely reentering the workforce.
Even if lawmakers reach an agreement in this lame duck session, President-elect Joe Biden has said that “any package passed in a lame-duck session is lucky to be at best just a start.” If lawmakers fail to hold the line now on wasteful spending, it will empower Democrats to spend trillions of dollars more in 2021.
As lawmakers continue to hash out the details of a potential new Coronavirus relief package, they should remove the $160 billion in bailout cash and $300-per-week in expanded unemployment payments from the final bill.
Photo Credit: Tim Rawle
Georgia Families and Small Businesses Will Face 55% Top Tax Rate Under Ossoff and Warnock

If Democrat Senate candidates Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff win their runoff elections on January 5th 2021, they will rubber stamp the Biden-Harris agenda to raise taxes on families and businesses in Georgia and across the country.
Biden has promised to impose $4 trillion in new or higher taxes on the American people.
Under this plan, Georgia families and individuals will face a top tax rate of 55.09 percent. Georgia small businesses that operate as pass-through entities and pay taxes through the individual code would also face this new top rate.
The breakdown is below:
Biden top federal rate: 39.6 percent
Georgia top rate: 5.75 percent
Medicare payroll tax: 1.45 percent
Biden new payroll tax: 6.2 percent
Pease limitation: 1.188 percent
Additional Medicare tax: .9 percent
-------------------
55.09 percent
Biden would repeal the Republican Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), which would raise the top marginal tax rate to 39.6 percent. A typical family of four with annual income of $73,000 will see a $2,000 tax hike.
Biden has also proposed implementing a new, 12.4 percent payroll tax on Americans earning above $400,000. This tax would be split evenly between employers and employees, resulting in a 6.2 percent tax hike on Americans. This new tax would not be indexed to inflation, meaning it would eventually hit all Americans.
Additionally, Biden would restore the Pease limitation, a provision that limits a filer’s itemized deduction by 3% of the amount that the filer’s AGI exceeds a certain threshold. The limitation can strip away up to 80% of the value of a taxpayer’s itemized deductions, an effective additional 1.188 percent tax when the top marginal rate is 39.6 percent. Biden would also cap itemized deductions at 28 percent.
While Ossoff and Warnock would support these tax increases on Georgians, Republican Senators Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue will hold firm against the Biden plan of higher taxes on families and businesses.
Photo Credit: John Ramspott
Pennsylvania Approves Late Budget Without Tax Hikes. But What Happens Next Year?

Recently, Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf signed into law a new budget that will carry state government operations through the remainder of the 2020-21 fiscal year. This legislation comes after lawmakers in Harrisburg approved a partial, stopgap budget amid the uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic back in May.
This new plan will bring the total operating budget for June 2021 to $36.5 billion, which is about a 4% increase in spending from last year. Fortunately for taxpayers, the approved budget does not include any tax hikes for Pennsylvanians – for now.
Lawmakers approved the use of roughly $1.33 billion CARES Act relief and more than $2.1 billion in federal Medicaid funding to balance the budget. However, the plan to use CARES Act funding to plug budget holes could be blocked by the federal government, as CARES Act guidance limits funds to be used only for costs directly related to the pandemic. Back in September, Pennsylvania was denied allocation of its CARES Act funds to make up its shortfall in yearly payments to school districts.
According to the Commonwealth Foundation, using one-time sources of money could create challenges for next year’s state budget. Gov. Wolf could attempt to increase taxes in 2021 in the name of avoiding cutting state funding, even if that funding was supplemented by CARES Act funds.
In 2009, something similar happened after Gov. Ed Rendell and the legislature used federal stimulus money to fund public schools. A few years later, when that stimulus money expired, there was sudden a $1 billion “budget cut” from public schools and the blame was placed on then-Gov. Tom Corbett. Since Gov. Wolf already proposes to increase taxes on energy bills with a natural gas severance tax every year, this could give him another excuse for it.
Further, the state budget uses $431 million from “shadow budgets” and makes small cuts to balance the budget. While this is great news for taxpayers in the moment, as it does not call for an immediate tax hike, this is just a one-time reduction in spending and does not provide long-term solutions.
A “shadow budget” is a portion of state spending in “off-book” accounts (not accounted for in the General Budget Revenue) that are financed by dedicated revenue sources or transfers from the General Fund. One shadow budget example is the redirection of sales tax revenue to the Public Transportation Trust Fund in 2007.
Shadow budgets prevent public scrutiny of spending decisions made by the legislature.
Lastly, the approved budget fails to restrict supplemental appropriations, making it highly likely that Gov. Wolf will “accidentally” overspend again. In the past, Gov. Wolf has exceeded budgeted amounts for certain programs by hundreds of millions of dollars through “supplemental appropriations.” This is a bad habit that needs to be formally restricted by the legislature – something this budget has failed to do.
A no-tax hike budget is another win for Pennsylvanians, but next year's budget fight is right around the corner.
Photo Credit: spodzone
House Democrats Want $12.1 Billion To Revive Obama-Era IRS

House Democrats are demanding increased IRS funding. In a letter to Congressional leadership, two dozen Democrats called for $12.1 billion in funding for the IRS including $5.2 billion for “enforcement activities.”
The Democrats argued that strong enforcement actions should be a “priority” for Congress, a goal shared by the incoming Biden administration.
According to Biden Council of Economic Advisers member Jared Bernstein, Biden will seek “significant increases in IRS enforcement and auditing.” This could lead to a return to the era of the Obama IRS which wrongly used its authority to target and harass taxpayers, especially conservative non-profits.
Most notably, the Obama IRS was caught unfairly denying conservative groups non-profit status ahead of the 2012 election.
According to a Senate Finance Committee report, the process set up by IRS employee Lois Lerner resulted in only one conservative group being granted non-profit status over a three year period.
This was no coincidence. As the report noted, this delay was a result of Lerner’s personal political views:
“...directly resulted in disparate treatment for applicants affiliated with Tea Party and other conservative causes… Lerner showed little concern for conservative applicants, even when members of Congress inquired on their behalf, allowing them to languish in the IRS bureaucracy for as long as two years with little or no action.”
Not only did the IRS allow this to occur but they also allowed evidence to be destroyed. According to documentation released by the House Oversight Committee, backup tapes containing as many as 24,000 Lois Lerner emails were destroyed by an IRS entity officially known as the “Media Management Midnight Unit” located in Martinsburg, West Virginia. These tapes were destroyed via powerful magnets a month after top IRS officials learned that there were gaps in the Lerner email production.
While this was one of the worst cases of misusing taxpayer dollars, the Obama IRS routinely misused federal funds and failed to do its job.
According to a Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) report, the IRS rehired more than 200 employees who were previously employed by the agency, but fired for previous conduct or performance issues between January 2015 and March 2016.
The agency routinely released this private information in FOIA requests where it should have been redacted, lost track of over 1,000 laptops containing sensitive taxpayer information, and destroyed laptops containing similar information.
The IRS failed to screen 2.2 million tax returns for possible ID theft and illegally gave 57 contracts valued at $18.8 million to 17 corporations, who had outstanding tax debt or a felony conviction.
Clearly, the agency displayed a clear record of politicization and incompetence.
Ultimately, the House Democrat request for increased IRS funding for “enforcement” is only the tip of the iceberg. Unfortunately for the American taxpayer, Biden is set to bring back all of the incompetence and corruption of the Obama IRS.
Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore
It’s Time to Get Drug Sentencing Reform Done in Ohio

Ohio’s Senate bill 3 continues to proceed through hearings in the House, following its overwhelming passage in the Senate earlier this year. This has been a long process, and the bill deserves to get over the finish line before session ends, and a new session begins next year.
The bill would reduce many nonviolent drug offenses from a felony down to a misdemeanor, divert more addicts to treatment rather than just incarceration, and expand expungement so people are better able to get back on their feet.
While some opponents continue to bring up concerns about the impact on drug abuse should SB3 pass, the bill remains a conservative, tough and smart approach. A Pew research study found no correlation between imprisonment rates and rates of drug use. And a recent Buckeye Institute paper thoroughly puts concerns to bed:
“According to a study in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), a prison sentence has little, if any, deterrent effect on future drug use by nonviolent drug offenders. The study found that “On average, incarceration in the United States costs approximately $22,000 per month, and there is little evidence that this strategy reduces drug use or drug-related re-incarceration rates for nonviolent drug offenders. … “A separate study of 15 states (including Ohio) by the Bureau of Justice Statistics found that one-quarter of individuals incarcerated for drug crimes returned to prison within three years.”.
The reality is that the current system does little to improve the situation with drug addiction, and makes it worse by not addressing addiction while tagging people with life-altering criminal convictions that make finding work and building a life more difficult.
This is why prison alternatives should be strongly considered. Senate bill 3 could give those struggling a second chance to get back on track rather than send them into a negative feedback spiral.
Further Senate Bill 3 remains bad news for dangerous drug dealers. Mandatory minimums and strict enforcement would still be intact for high-level traffickers and offenders.
Getting these low level offenders out of the prison system could be prudent way to help Ohio’s already overcrowded prisons. The main focus is on reducing crime and helping individuals but, the fiscal benefits from this bill can’t be ignored. The Ohio legislative services commission estimates this bill could save the state $75 million per year.
The House and Governor DeWine should act swiftly to get SB3 passed and signed before the year is out. It would be a step towards reducing the size and scope of government power by administering proportional justice to nonviolent offenders, and reducing the need for government spending on prisons.
Photo Credit: https://www.urbanohio.com
100,000 Georgia Families Will See Return of Obamacare Mandate Tax Under Warnock and Ossoff

If Democrat Senate candidates Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff win their runoff elections on January 5th, 2021, they will provide the deciding votes for the Biden-Harris agenda of tax increases on families and businesses in Georgia and across the country.
This will result in the reinstatement of the Obamacare individual mandate tax penalty, increasing taxes on over 100,000 low and middle-income Georgia families.
The individual mandate tax forced American families to purchase government approved health insurance or pay a $695 tax for an individual and $2,085 for a family. It was zeroed out in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) passed by Congressional Republicans and signed by President Trump.
When it was in effect, the tax was one of the regressive in the code and hit millions of low- and middle-income Americans across the country and in Georgia. According to IRS data:
In 2017, the tax hit 143,180 Georgia households.
- 127,620 of those households, or 89 percent, had annual income of $50,000 or less.
- 135,360 of those households, or 94 percent, had annual income of $75,000 or less.
In 2018, the tax hit 116,430 Georgia households.
- 100,800 of those households, or 86 percent, had annual income of $50,000 or less.
- 108,290 of those households, or 93 percent, had annual income of $75,000 or less
While Warnock and Ossoff support the Biden agenda of higher taxes, Senator Perdue and Senator Loeffler oppose efforts to reimpose the individual mandate.
By voting for the TCJA in 2017, Sen. Perdue voted to zero out the mandate and reduce taxes for middle class families.
While Sen. Loeffler was not in Congress for this vote, she has consistently opposed new tax increases on the American people. She recently released the “Modernizing Americans’ Health Care Plan,” a framework that directly repudiated the left’s plan to raise taxes and impose socialized healthcare. Instead, her proposal calls for increased healthcare choice and access through free market, patient-centered policies.
On January 5th, a vote for Ossoff and Warnock is a vote to reimpose the Obamacare mandate tax on over 100,000 middle class Georgia families.
See also:
Georgia Middle Class Families Will Pay Higher Taxes If Warnock and Ossoff Win
Ossoff and Warnock Vow To End Georgia's Right To Work Protections
Photo Credit: John Ramspott
Supercut: Team Biden Vows to Impose Carbon Tax

Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have endorsed a carbon tax on the American people.
And as shown in the video below, they are surrounding themselves with others pushing a carbon tax, including climate czar John Kerry, OMB pick Neera Tanden, and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen:
A carbon tax would impose burdens on households due to higher costs of cooling and heating, transportation, and groceries.
Even Hillary Clinton in 2016 decided to oppose a carbon tax after she learned the following from an internal Clinton report prepared by policy staff:
The Hillary memo states that a carbon tax would devastate low-income households: “As with the increase in energy costs, the increase in the cost of nonenergy goods and services would disproportionately impact low-income households.”
The Hillary memo states that a carbon tax would cause gas prices to increase 40 cents a gallon and residential electricity prices to increase 12% - 21%: “In our analysis, for example, a $42/ton GHG fee increases gasoline prices by roughly 40 cents per gallon on average between 2020 and 2030 and residential electricity prices by 2.6 cents per kWh, 12% and 21% above levels projected in the EIA’s 2014 Annual Energy Outlook respectively.
The Hillary memo states a carbon tax would cause household energy bills to go up significantly: “Average household energy costs would increase by roughly $480 per year, or 10% relative to the levels projected in EIA’s 2014 Outlook.”
The Hillary memo states that a carbon tax would increase the cost of household goods and services: “The cost of other household goods and services would increase as well as companies pass forward the higher energy costs paid to produce those goods and services on to consumers.”
(Source: MEMORANDUM FOR HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON -- Jan. 20, 2015)
Carbon taxes are highly unpopular with voters. In fact, carbon tax advocates can’t even get a carbon tax passed in a single blue state, as this timeline shows.
Carbon taxes also saddle state and local governments with huge costs. For example, a school district in Canada was forced to kick 400 kids off the school bus program in order to pay a $3.3 million carbon tax bill.
It's no wonder conservative groups wrote a letter to Congress Stating: "We oppose any carbon tax." The official Republican Party platform also rejects "any carbon tax."
Biden's carbon tax will also shatter his pledge to each and every American making less than $400,000 that he will not raise a single penny of any tax.
Congress Should Pass the Craft Beverage Modernization Act

If lawmakers fail to act by the end of the year, breweries, distilleries, and wineries across America will face a tax increase.
The Craft Beverage Modernization and Tax Reform Act (CBMTRA) was first enacted through the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. This bill provided federal excise tax relief for breweries, wineries, and distilleries, allowing these businesses to hire more employees, purchase new equipment, and expand production.
Unfortunately, this tax relief was temporary and is set to expire at the end of the year. Congress can make these tax cuts permanent by passing S. 362/H.R. 1175, legislation introduced by Reps. Ron Kind (D-Wis.) and Mike Kelly (R-Pa.) and Senators Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Roy Blunt (R-Mo).
This legislation is overwhelmingly bipartisan and has been co-sponsored by 350 members of the House of Representatives and 76 Senators. Congress should pass this legislation, either as a stand-alone proposal or as part of a broader legislative package.
ATR has kept a running list of dozens of distilleries, breweries, and wineries that have been able to expand production, hire new workers, and invest in the economy thanks to the CBMTRA. Making these tax cuts permanent will help businesses continue supporting the economy and workers.
Examples of businesses that have already seen benefits from the CBMTRA include:
(Healdsburg, California) – The vineyard was able to create new jobs, buy new equipment, and remodel their tasting rooms because of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act:
“The craft beverage bill has been an incredible boost for our industry and this extension allows us to continue investing in our wineries by buying new equipment, remodeling tasting rooms, hiring new employees and more,” said Hank Wetzel, founder and family partner of Alexander Valley Vineyards and Chairman of Wine Institute. “All of this benefits local communities in the form of jobs, tax revenue and support for the hospitality industry.” – Dec. 20, 2019, Southeast Farm Press article.
(Clackamas, Oregon) – Because of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the owner was able to create new jobs and invest in new equipment:
Jeff Parish, Co-Founder of Portland Cider Company and Committee Member of the United States Association of Cider Makers: “As a cider maker, the temporary CBMTRA allowed me to purchase new equipment, hire new staff and grow my business. If the excise tax credits go away, I have to reverse those choices. We're hopeful the permanent version of the bill passes, so we can plan with certainty for a growth-future." – Feb. 6, 2019, U.S. Senate Finance Committee press release.
(Milwaukee, Wisconsin) – The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act allowed the distillery to hire four new employees, invest in a new facility, and ordered a new bottling line:
"Central Standard Distillery co-owner Evan Hughes said his business was able to grow faster than it normally would because of the act. He attributes four key growth areas to the success of the act, including: Central Standard hired four new employees, bringing staff totals to 22 people. The company invested in a 15,000-square-foot facility on Clybourn Street. In addition, Central Standard ordered a new bottling line for improved efficiency and offered health care to all of its employees.
"It gave us the courage to expand our business quicker than we normally would," Hughes said. – Dec. 10, 2019, Milwaukee Business Journal.
(Cleveland, Ohio) – The tax cuts allowed the bar to add new jobs and invest more in their facility:
Sam McNulty, co-founder of multiple Cleveland brewery/restaurants including Market Garden Brewery and Bar Cento, credited the tax break with helping his operations expand at an accelerated rate, "which in our case meant several million dollars of investment in our facility as well as the creation of a large number of full-time positions."
Not having certainty for the tax cut beyond next year could stymie other, more long-term investments.
"As in life, so it goes in business, where if the future is uncertain, you are more likely to be less secure and optimistic and thus more conservative and frugal," McNulty said. "There's not a bank on the planet that will finance a business that has only a one-year lease. And so a one-year extension is appreciated, but it is not enough to really fuel this growing industry and reach the full promise of the economic benefits of local craft beer." – Dec. 17, 2018, Crains Cleveland article.
Photo Credit: Darren Maloney



















