Americans for Tax Reform joined a coalition of more than 40 organizations in a letter to members of Congress, urging them to oppose S. 1863, the PROVE IT Act.
The PROVE IT Act would establish a bureaucratic framework which could allow for the future implementation of a carbon tax and carbon tariffs. These misguided proposals threaten to raise costs for all Americans and would disproportionately target the poor and elderly with higher energy costs.
It is no coincidence that the co-sponsors and supporters of the PROVE IT Act are Washington’s biggest pushers of carbon taxes.
As noted by the Washington Post, the legislation is “a bill that would lay the groundwork for America’s first carbon border tax.”
Read the full letter here or below:
June 3, 2024
Dear Representative:
Since a House companion to the PROVE IT Act (S.1863) may be introduced soon, the undersigned organizations want to express our strong opposition to this pro-tax, anti-energy legislation that will lead to both a carbon tax on imports and a domestic carbon tax.
The PROVE IT Act requires the Department of Energy to collect, analyze, and regularly update data on the carbon intensity of domestic and foreign goods. Through the creation of this federal administrative framework, Congress would be removing one of the biggest obstacles to the imposition of carbon taxes on both imported and domestically produced goods.
It is clear that this information would then be used to impose new “climate” taxes, similar to what Democrats in Congress did during the summer of 2022. In the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which no Republicans supported in either the House or the Senate, Congress took information collected under the EPA’s greenhouse gas reporting program and imposed the first- ever federal methane tax. The Senate passed the IRA on a 51-50 party-line vote with Vice President Kamala Harris casting the tiebreaker.
Many PROVE IT Act supporters have shown they seek a replay of the methane tax maneuver. In the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee markup of the bill, all Committee Democrats voted to kill an amendment that would have helped block the future use of reconciliation to use PROVE IT Act information to impose carbon taxes on either imported or domestically produced goods. Chairman Tom Carper (D-DE) opposed the amendment precisely because it “prohibits any revenue measure based on the greenhouse gas emissions associated with commodities or products.”
Many of the bill supporters expressly admit that the legislation would be used to develop carbon taxes of some kind. Senator Chris Coons (D-DE), a lead sponsor and a past sponsor of domestic carbon tax legislation has said the PROVE IT Act will inform the “process for imposing tariffs on countries that don’t have any transparency around their emissions” as “part of any border carbon adjustment mechanism.” The European Union (EU) has created the first and only carbon border adjustment mechanism and it includes both a carbon tax on imports and a domestic carbon pricing scheme.
Once a carbon tax on imported goods is created, the U.S. would inevitably impose a domestic carbon tax. This is due both to trade law obligations and because environmental groups and others would not stay silent as domestic industries fail to meet similar greenhouse gas reduction commitments. Also, most domestic manufacturers would oppose a domestic carbon tax absent a corresponding tax on imports to “level the playing field.” Enacting the corresponding tax on imports would therefore weaken industry opposition to a domestic carbon tax.
The U.S. House recently passed a bipartisan resolution opposing and explaining the many harmful effects of domestic carbon taxes (H.Con.Res.86). The PROVE IT Act would help to make those harms a reality.
We find it very concerning that legislators would support a bill that would lead to:
Massive New Taxes. It’s not just a domestic carbon tax that would inflict financial pain on Americans. The burden of a carbon tax on imports would primarily be borne by American businesses and consumers. It acts as a domestic consumption tax.
Punishing Energy Use. Since more than 80 percent of the world’s energy comes from coal, natural gas, and oil, which produce carbon dioxide emissions, carbon taxes are taxes on the energy that make modern life possible. Put more simply, a carbon tax is a tax on modern life.
Hurting the Poor. All Americans would suffer through higher prices due to these taxes. This would always be harmful, but it’s especially harmful now as the United States suffers through years of inflation. Higher prices due to carbon taxes, especially to meet basic needs, would have a disproportionate impact on low-income households.
Embracing EU’s Extreme Climate Policy. Instead of fighting and rejecting the EU’s disastrous climate policy, the PROVE IT Act embraces what the EU is doing. Many supporters advocate for a carbon border adjustment mechanism and seek to create a “carbon club” of countries that join together to impose carbon taxes in some fashion.
Americans want affordable and reliable energy, not federal tax schemes that treat energy use as a sin. This bill though would lead to such taxes and is one of the biggest threats to energy and economic prosperity in recent memory.
Therefore, we strongly urge legislators to oppose the PROVE IT Act and ensure that it is not included, in any form, within other legislation.
Sincerely,
Daren Bakst
Director, Center for Energy and Environment
Competitive Enterprise Institute
Lisa B. Nelson
Chief Executive Officer ALEC Action
John Droz, Jr.
Founder
Alliance for Wise Energy Decisions
Phil Kerpen
President
American Commitment
Kristen Walker
Policy Analyst
The American Consumer Institute
Thomas J. Pyle
President
American Energy Alliance
Hon. Jason Isaac
CEO
American Energy Institute
Margaret Byfield
Executive Director
American Stewards of Liberty
Richard Manning
President
Americans for Limited Government
Brent Gardner
Chief Government Affairs Officer Americans for Prosperity
Grover Norquist
President
Americans for Tax Reform
David T. Stevenson
Director, Center for Energy & Environment Caesar Rodney Institute
Ryan Ellis
President
Center for a Free Economy
Daniel Mitchell
President
Center for Freedom and Prosperity
Jeffrey Mazzella
President
Center for Individual Freedom
John Hinderaker
President
Center of the American Experiment
André Béliveau
Senior Manager of Energy Policy Commonwealth Foundation
Matthew Kandrach
President
Consumer Action for a Strong Economy
E. Calvin Beisner, Ph.D.
President
Cornwall Alliance for the Stewardship of Creation
Jerry Simmons
President and CEO
Domestic Energy Producers Alliance
Kristen Ullman President Eagle Forum
Craig Richardson
President
Energy and Environment Legal Institute (E&E Legal)
George Landrith President
Frontiers of Freedom
Cameron Sholty Executive Director Heartland Impact
James Taylor President
The Heartland Institute
Ryan Walker
Executive Vice President Heritage Action for America
Mario H. Lopez
President
Hispanic Leadership Fund
Gabriella Hoffman
Director, Center for Energy and Conservation
Independent Women’s Voice
Tom Harris
Executive Director
International Climate Science Coalition
Jon Sanders
Director of the Center for Food, Power, and Life
John Locke Foundation
Seton Motley President
Less Government
Charles Sauer President Market Institute
Brandon Arnold Executive Vice President National Taxpayers Union
Daniel C. Turner Executive Director Power the Future
Donna Jackson
Director of Membership Development Project 21
Paul Gessing
President
Rio Grande Foundation
Bette Grande
CEO and President Roughrider Policy Center
James E. Enstrom President
Scientific Integrity Institute
Karen Kerrigan
President
Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council
David Williams
President
Taxpayers Protection Alliance
Greg Sindelar
CEO
Texas Public Policy Foundation
Derrick Max
President and CEO
Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy
Frank Lasee
President
Truth in Energy and Climate
Ben Zycher
Senior Fellow
*American Enterprise Institute
*Affiliation is for identification purposes only.