Biden: Capital gains tax “much too low”
Biden’s comment and his Senate voting record make clear he will push for cap gains hike if elected
Joe Biden said the capital gains tax is “much too low,” during a town hall in Houston on Tuesday. [Click here for video]
“You buy something, you buy stock at a dollar it goes to two dollars. You buy a Million, it goes to a million five. When you cash that in to make the gain you made, you have to pay a capital gains tax, which I believe is much too low,” Biden said during the American Federation of Teachers town hall.
Raising the capital gains tax would harm Americans’ ability to build a nest egg and hurt the value of their homes, farms, and businesses.
Biden’s comments and his long Senate voting record mean voters should expect him to push for capital gains tax hikes if elected. During his time in the Senate, Biden consistently voted against tax cuts on capital gains.
In 2003, Biden voted against the reduction in the capital gains rate from 20 percent to 15 percent. In 2005 and 2006, Biden voted against extending the 15 percent rate.
In 2012, then-Vice President Biden and President Obama insisted the cap gains rate revert to 20 percent.
Biden and Obama then piled on another 3.8 percent capital gains tax hike -- the Net Income Investment Tax -- one of the many tax increases in Obamacare. The 3.8 percent tax hike took effect Jan. 1, 2013.
Currently, long-term capital gains are taxed at zero percent, 15 percent, 20 percent, or 23.8 percent, depending on income level.
“A Biden capital gains tax hike would hurt jobs and growth,” said Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform. Norquist added: “Capital gains tax increases are particularly damaging to older Americans who have assets – a house, small business, land, or stock -- that they plan to retire on. And what do older Americans do? They vote.”
See also:
VIDEO: Five Times Biden has Threatened to Repeal Tax Cuts
Biden: “First thing I’d do is repeal those Trump tax cuts.”
Joe Biden broke his middle class tax pledge
“Mayor Pete” Calls for Steep Tax Hike on Homes and Businesses
Kamala Harris Vows Repeal of Tax Cuts “on Day One”
Biden: “When I’m President, if God willing I am, we’re going to reverse those Trump tax cuts.”
Iowa Republicans Deliver Much-Needed Tax Relief

Gov. Kim Reynolds and Republican legislators are delivering $1 billion in tax relief to Iowans over the next eight years.
Senate File 619, managed by Senator Dan Dawson and Representative Dustin D. Hite, will make a number of pro-growth reforms to Iowa’s tax code that will allow individual taxpayers, families, and small businesses across the Hawkeye State to keep more of their heard-earned money.
One of the biggest victories in SF 619 is that it will fully phase out the state inheritance by 2025. Right now, Iowa has the unwelcome distinction of being one of just six states that still impose an inheritance or death tax. Because of this, non-lineal descendants – including siblings, nieces, nephews, domestic partners, and business partners – have faced a tax of up to 15 percent when they inherit assets that are valued at more than $25,000.
“In Iowa, this often means a niece or nephew who inherits a share of the family farm from an uncle who never married will be faced with finding hundreds of thousands of dollars to hold onto land that’s been in their family for generations,” explained Iowans for Tax Relief. “Iowa’s inheritance tax hits entrepreneurs, too. If unrelated partners build a business together and one of them dies, the deceased partner’s half of the business would be subject to the inheritance tax if they choose to leave their portion to their business partner.”
Thanks to SF 619, Iowa’s death tax will not be around much longer. “Death taxes are always a second or third tax on the same income and savings,” explained Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform. “The argument for death taxes is the politics of envy. The good news is that 70% of Americans have year after year consistently supported abolishing the death tax. Killing the death tax is good economics, good politics and helps end class warfare nonsense.”
Another benefit of SF 619 is that it guarantees much-needed income tax relief will be delivered in 2023. Back in 2018, Iowa passed a tax reform bill that, once fully implemented, will deliver the largest tax cut in Iowa history. The catch with the 2018 tax reform package is that it made a lot of those important reforms contingent upon stringent triggers being met.
“The 2018 tax reform law designed two stringent revenue triggers for income tax rates to be reduced in 2023,” explained John Hendrickson, Policy Director for TEF Iowa. “The first, state revenues were to surpass $8.3 billion, and the second required revenue growth of at least four percent during that fiscal year. Eliminating both triggers removes an unnecessary impediment to rate reduction.”
SF 619 removes the unnecessary triggers from the 2018 tax reform law, guaranteeing tax relief will be delivered on time. Among other changes, in 2023, Iowa’s top income tax rate of 8.53 percent – the part of the income tax that is most often used to make decisions about investment – will be reduced to 6.5 percent. This will be a huge win for all Iowans.
Under the status quo, Iowa’s income tax is not competitive. Nine states – including Iowa’s neighbor South Dakota – do not tax wage income and thirty-three more states – including neighbors Illinois, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and Wisconsin – have top marginal individual income tax rates that are lower than Iowa’s. The lower rate will make Iowa more attractive to investment, and will allow individual taxpayers, families, and small businesses, which overwhelming pay income taxes on the personal side of the code, to invest more in jobs and wages.
While this is a great first step, Iowa should not get complacent. As people and jobs continue to move out of high tax states and into states that do not impose income taxes, more states are looking to put their income taxes on the path to zero. Iowa has a long way to go if it really wants to attract investment, jobs, and opportunities.
Photo Credit: Danksergeant15
More from Americans for Tax Reform
Arizona Must Finish the Job on Conservative Criminal Justice Reform With Earned Release Expansion
As we near the end the 2021 legislative session in Arizona, major conservative priority legislation remains on the table: one proposal to significantly reduce Arizona’s tax burden, and the other would incentivize low-level criminal offenders to address addiction issues and gain job skills.
Senate Bill 1064, sponsored by Sen. J.D. Mesnard, would expand earned release credits in the state,
Earned release credits allow someone to complete programming that teaches them job skills, addresses addiction, or mental health issues, and more. The goal is to address problems that are more likely to drive someone to re-offend, reducing crime and improving safety. The alternative has been doing next to nothing with offenders who are going to get out of prison one day no matter what.
These are commonsense, conservative policies that work to keep people out of trouble, reducing recidivism rates. This ultimately improves public safety and reduces costs to taxpayers at the same time. Just look at the results other states have had.
South Carolina expanded their earned release credits, along with other changes, seeing declines in reoffending (-5.6%), and prison population (-14.5%), from 2010-2017.
Kentucky saw its recidivism rate fall (-5.3%), and its prison population fall (-23%) since 2011 reforms.
In 2008 and 2013, Mississippi significantly curtailed truth-in-sentencing requirements that effectively limited the ability of offenders to earn credits off their sentence. The results have been falling rates of violent crime, a decrease in property crime, to go along with a smaller prison population.
In addition to these great examples of successful red state reforms, the federal government is still in the process of implementing the First STEP Act – earned release credit legislation passed under President Trump.
These reforms are improvements to the criminal justice system that put public safety first. Credits incentivize people, largely non-violent drug offenders, to do the work necessary to get ready for their imminent release from prison so they can contribute to society.
It’s no surprise that this is a drastic improvement over the status quo. Since the vast majority of people in prison are going to get out one day, it is no-brainer level stuff to address the problems that can drive them to re-offend. Mainly these are addiction problems, and not having a decent job.
In the end, this also boosts public safety as millions of taxpayer dollars are saved which can then be reinvested in the system, with a focus on policies and programming that improve public safety. Arizona Senate Bill 1064 could save more than $600 million that would otherwise be spent in ways that do not optimally protect the public.
Legislators in the House and Senate have already done great work passing civil asset forfeiture reform, and ending driver’s license suspension for owed court debt. These are key improvements to Arizona’s criminal justice system. But there is still a major priority remaining, SB 1064, and legislators and Governor Ducey should support and approve the bill this session.
More from Americans for Tax Reform
Vox Supports ABC Test Despite Firing 200 Freelancers Before It Became Law

Vox Media recently published an article advocating for the ABC test to ensure “fairer conditions” for gig workers that are classified as independent contractors. In its so-called “analysis,” Vox ignores that the ABC test remains broadly unpopular among California’s independent contractors, and that a national ABC test would threaten the jobs of more than 59 million Americans that engage in freelance work.
Freelancers offer vibrancy to the American economy, and the ability to work as an independent contractor provides Americans with the flexibility that does not come with a traditional employment relationship. Think of a single mom earning a living by selling homemade goods on Etsy, or an Uber or Lyft driver using extra cash he earns to start a business of his own. These are real Americans chasing their dreams without the need to have a boss.
The ABC test under AB5 forced Californian companies to reclassify freelancers as employees, effectively eliminating the possibility of a freelancer classification. Under the ABC test, businesses must prove that a contractor is doing duties “outside the usual course of work of the hiring entity” and that “the worker customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as the work performed.” This significantly limits the ability of businesses to retain contractors who may operate within the scope of work sometimes performed by employees in similar circumstances. It’s an unnecessary distinction that prohibits most businesses from working with independent contractors.
The ABC test forced the mass reclassification of California’s independent contractors, forcing countless residents to flee the state to pay their bills and chase their dreams. More than 90 percent of California independent contractors opposed the ABC test reclassification before it was signed into law. ATR has complied 655 personal testimonials from independent contractors who details the ways that AB5 has hurt them, which you can view here.
In fact, the ABC test was so unpopular that Californian voters passed Proposition 22 by over a 17-point margin which allowed ride-sharing and delivery drivers to continue working as independent contractors. Recent survey data from Californian drivers indicates their broad support for Proposition 22. 3 out 4 drivers polled said that they believe that people from other states would benefit if Proposition 22 were passed there and 76% of drivers polled said that Proposition 22 personally benefits them. In comparison to the ABC test, 84% of drivers believe that the Proposition 22 was a superior solution to reclassifying independent contractors as employees. Instead of acknowledging this data, Vox made broad-sweeping allegations regarding the worries and concerns of workers regarding Proposition 22 without directly engaging any of the data that poked holes in their assertions.
Vox also ignored the devastating impact of a national ABC test on American small businesses. 73% of small business owners polled feel that working with freelancers was critical to surviving the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, 45% of small businesses felt that the PRO Act, a federal law that includes nationalizing the “ABC” test, would force them to close their doors forever.
Ironically, the ABC test crushed some former Vox Media workers. About 200 freelancers from Vox Media in California lost their jobs in the month prior to AB5 going into effect. A cruel irony exists when an organization publishes an article that frames the ABC Standard as a “huge victory for workers” despite firing their workers as a direct result of that law.
The ABC test was such a disaster for California that voters chose to exempt rideshare drivers from its onerous requirements. Similarly, a national ABC test would be a disaster for small businesses and freelancers alike. As our economy attempts to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, the last thing we need is to limit opportunities for American workers to earn a living.
Photo Credit: Nick Youngson CC BY-SA 3.0 Pix4free.org
More from Americans for Tax Reform
Norquist Discusses Biden’s Costly, Intrusive IRS Plan on “Mornings with Maria”

Today, Americans for Tax Reform President Grover Norquist appeared on Maria Bartiromo’s Mornings with Maria on Fox Business.
Norquist discussed the consequences to Biden's proposed $80 billion expansion of the IRS and intrusive reporting requirements.
On Biden’s plan to give the IRS access to all taxpayers’ bank accounts and third-party payment provider accounts like Venmo and CashApp:
“This includes PayPal. This is not people with millions of dollars in Swiss bank accounts. This is your checkbook… This is all of the ways you buy something with your iPhone. This is an old trick. They’ve been doing it for 40 years, but this is on steroids… This is the end of privacy. This is an agency that has been caught handing out, for political purposes, people’s personal donations so they could be attacked. This abuse is going to get much worse.”
On Biden’s plan to hire 87,000 new IRS employees and increase funding by nearly $80 billion:
“Biden’s IRS commissioner said that there’s no way to spend this money intelligently. We’re talking about 87,000 people they’re going to hire. They haven’t even been able to hire the people they’ve tried to in the last several years…”
On how Biden’s plan would cause the same corruption in the IRS as was seen during the Obama administration:
“This happened under Obama when they targeted the tea party and didn’t let them incorporate—didn’t give them 501(C)(3) status… or 501(C)(4) status, and therefore they couldn’t get a bank account or raise money. That’s why the tea party was destroyed by the IRS… There was one conservative group in three years that was allowed to [incorporate]. The Clinton people did this as well.”
Lawmakers Should Support Rep. Carol Miller’s Saving Gig Economy Taxpayers Act

Yesterday, Congresswoman Carol Miller (R-W.Va) introduced a bill that would repeal burdensome reporting requirements on independent contractors included in the Democrats’ American Rescue Plan. In the Senate, Senator Rick Scott (R-Fla.) has introduced a companion bill, S. 948. ATR urges lawmakers to support and cosponsor the Saving Gig Economy Taxpayers Act.
The American Rescue Plan contained a provision that lowered the reporting threshold to $600 or more for 1099-K reporting and eliminated the transactions threshold. Prior, one was only required to report when there were more than $20,000 in sales and more than 200 transactions in a year. The provision also extended the 1099-K reporting to "specified electronic payment processors."
This adds significant compliance burdens for freelancers and independent contractors including freelancers compensated via PayPal, Etsy sellers, Airbnb hosts, Uber and Lyft drivers, food delivery couriers, and others participating in the sharing economy.
This provision disproportionately harms low- and middle-income contractors, small businesses, and freelancers, many of which have been devastated by the coronavirus pandemic. Repealing it would protect gig economy workers and small e-commerce sellers, ensuring they are able to maintain the flexibility and reliability of their jobs.
“Congresswoman Carol Miller should be applauded for introducing the Saving Gig Economy Taxpayers Act," said ATR President Grover Norquist. "This legislation will repeal burdensome 1099-K reporting requirements that Democrats snuck into Biden’s $1.9 trillion COVID-19 spending bill. If lawmakers fail to pass Rep. Miller’s bill, low-and middle-income contractors, small businesses, and freelancers will be slugged with new reporting requirements and paperwork mandates that will result in unnecessary tax complexity.”
Democrats have tried to impose similar 1099 requirements before. It was so unpopular that the requirements were repealed within a year. Democrats last enacted burdensome 1099 reporting requirements in Obamacare, when they required businesses to send 1099 forms for all purchases of goods and services over $600 annually.
Soon after this provision was signed into law, the National Taxpayer Advocate raised concerns that these reporting requirements would cause “disproportionate” harm to small businesses and do little to improve tax compliance.
This provision was so unpopular that it was quickly repealed in 2011 with a bipartisan vote of 87 to 12 in the Senate and 314 to 112 in the House. The Obama administration even hailed repeal of the provision a “big win” for small businesses in a press release:
“Today, President Obama signed a law that removes the expanded ‘1099’ reporting requirement from the Affordable Care Act. This is a big win for small businesses.
The SBA and President Obama supported repealing this provision, which would have required businesses to send 1099 forms for all purchases of goods and services over $600 annually. With this bipartisan effort, we have removed a requirement that would have been an undue barrier to small business growth.”
Hopefully, through Rep. Carol Miller’s bill, the 1099 reporting requirements in the American Rescue Plan will meet the same fate. If they are serious about protecting independent contractors and small businesses from burdensome regulations, lawmakers should support the Saving Gig Economy Taxpayers Act.
Photo Credit: Rep. Carol Miller
Small Business on Threat of Biden Tax Hikes: "We have already started a hiring freeze."

There are over one million small businesses organized as C-corporations and they will be directly hit by President Biden's corporate tax rate increase. These employers are vital members of the Main Street business community in cities and towns across America.
With Biden's threat to raise the corporate tax rate from 21 percent up to 28 percent, some small businesses are instituting hiring freezes.
As reported by Reuters, Michael Canty of Ohio-based Alloy Precision Technologies is very concerned about the Biden tax increases:
His manufacturing company employs roughly 85 people and is formed as a C-corp under the federal tax code and subject to the corporate tax rate.
He said the proposal amounts to a 33 percent increase is his company's taxes and warned that it will make companies like his less competitive in the global marketplace.
"We have already started a hiring freeze. Between the tax increase and what we see as a tough regulatory environment, we have to prepare," Canty said.
Biden doesn't want the public to know that his tax increases will wallop small businesses hard.
During his campaign, President Joe Biden promised the American people that he would not raise taxes on small businesses. Now safely in office, he is violating that promise. His tax plan imposes direct tax increases on small businesses.
The promise was made on Feb. 20, 2020 before a national audience during a Democratic debate hosted by MSNBC:
MSNBC's Hallie Jackson: "I want to ask you about Latinos owning one out of every four new small businesses in the United States. Many of them have benefited from President Trump's tax cuts, and they may be hesitant about new taxes or regulations. Will taxes on their small businesses go up under your administration?"
Biden: "No. Taxes on small businesses won't go up."
Click here or below to see Biden's broken pledge
But Biden is pushing a series of tax increases that raise small business taxes:
1. Biden's increase in the top marginal income tax rate to 39.6 percent will hit small business sole proprietorships, LLCs, partnerships and S-corporations.
Small businesses organized as pass-through firms don’t pay taxes themselves. Instead, the profits of the business “pass through” to the owners who pay individual taxes on their 1040 form. Biden wants to raise the top marginal income tax rate to 39.6 percent which will hit many small businesses.
From the Tax Policy Center:
"In 2017, individuals reported about $1.03 trillion in net income from all types of pass-throughs accounting for 9.3 percent of total AGI reported on individual income tax returns."
According to the Congressional Research Service, "The majority of both corporations and pass-throughs in 2011 had fewer than five employees (55% of C corporations and 64% of pass-throughs). Nearly 99% of both corporations and pass-throughs had fewer than 500 employees, the most common employment-based threshold used by the Small Business Administration (SBA)."
As noted in a Senate Finance Committee report, "in 2016, only 42 percent of net business income in the United States was earned by corporations, down from 78.3 percent in 1980."
2. Biden’s corporate income tax rate hike from 21 percent to 28 percent targets one million small businesses across the country organized as corporations.
As noted by the Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy, there are 31.7 million small businesses in the U.S. Of those, 25.7 million have no employees, while 6 million have employees. Of these 6 million small employers, 16.8 percent, or 1 million of these businesses are classified as c-corporations. The SBA classifies a small employer as any independent business with fewer than 500 employees.
Biden claims his spending plan makes large corporations pay their “fair share.” However, the plan will raise taxes on many small businesses that are structured as corporations.
3. Biden's elimination of stepped up basis: A second death tax on small business.
Biden is targeting small businesses with a second Death Tax: Biden will eliminate step-up in basis. This is a devastating tax increase on small businesses. In this video, you can see a sample of the many times Biden has threatened to eliminate step-up in basis.
Elimination of stepped up basis would impose an automatic capital gains tax at death -- separate from, and in addition to -- the Death Tax.
In a Forbes piece titled "This Biden Tax Hike Hike Will Hit Mom & Pop Hard" tax lawyer Robert W. Wood writes:
Under current tax law, assets that pass directly to your heirs get a step-up in basis for income tax purposes. It doesn’t matter if you pay estate tax when you die or not. For generations, assets held at death get a stepped-up basis—to market value—when you die. Small businesses count on this.
Wood notes:
Biden's proposal would tax an asset's unrealized appreciation at transfer. You mean Junior gets taxed whether or not he sells the business? Essentially, yes. The idea that you could build up your small business and escape death tax and income tax to pass it to your kids is on the chopping block. Biden would levy a tax on unrealized appreciation of assets passed on at death. By taxing the unrealized gain at death, heirs would get hit at the transfer, regardless of whether they sell the asset.
As reported previously by CNBC:
“When someone dies and the asset transfers to an heir, that transfer itself will be a taxable event, and the estate is required to pay taxes on the gains as if they sold the asset,” said Howard Gleckman, senior fellow in the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center.
As reported by Richard Rubin of the Wall Street Journal:
Manufacturers and farmers, who tend to be more asset-rich and cash-poor, are watching closely for those details, concerned they might have to sell illiquid businesses to pay the taxes.
Courtney Silver, president of Ketchie Inc., a family-owned, 25-employee machine shop in Concord, N.C. that started in 1947, said she was concerned about the potential impact.
“I really can’t imagine being hit with that decision of that potential tax implication,” said Ms. Silver, 40 years old, who took over the business when her husband, Bobby Ketchie, died in 2014. “That to me is really hard to wrap my head around.”
It could be challenging for asset owners to figure out their tax basis, which is what they paid for the property and invested in it. That complexity is part of what doomed a similar proposal in the late 1970s, which Congress passed, then delayed, then repealed.
As noted in an Ernst and Young study, if a small business is unable to provide sufficient evidence to prove the cost basis of an asset, then it may set to $0. In other words, tax would be applied to the entire value of taxpayer assets:
“Family-owned businesses may also find it difficult to comply because of problems in determining the decedent’s basis and in valuing the bequeathed assets. It seems likely that these administrative problems could lead to costly disputes between taxpayers and the IRS. Additionally, if sufficient evidence is not available to prove basis, then $0 may be used for tax purposes. This may result in an inappropriately large tax at death.”
To honor his small business tax pledge to the American people, Biden must forego the above tax increases.
Biden uses EOs to lessen government transparency

Biden’s never-ending use of executive orders (EOs) are not what the Founding Father’s intended, and their policy directives run counter to the values of the US.
The president’s constant stream of EO’s show that he is not serious about transparency and bipartisanship in Washington, despite what him and his staff say to the press. The president used EOs to revoke common sense government policies that were put in place under President Trump to increase government transparency.
President Biden reversed a Trump era policy that required government guidance documents be placed in a searchable database, so citizens can easily access them. Guidance documents help explain the agency interpretation of government regulations and how they apply to the public and private businesses. It is logical that if you are going to burden citizens with government regulation, you should at least give them easily accessible guidance as to how the regulation will be interpreted.
Senator Ron Johnson (Wis.-R) along with 20 Senate Republicans sent a letter to the President stressing their concerns over the policy change. The letter states:
“Since February, a number of federal agencies have taken steps to eliminate public access to guidance documents in order to comply with your directive. We believe these actions run counter to the principles of an open, transparent government and the rule of law… In the past, efforts to promote a more open and transparent government have been bipartisan, and we see on reason why they should not be today.”
The initial policy directive from President Trump came from the bipartisan legislation known as the Guidance Out Of Darkness Act (or the GOOD Act). The legislation was successfully voted out of committee in the last two Congresses by a bipartisan majority. One should also note that when serving in the Senate, Vice President Harris voted in support of the legislation.
The actions put into place by President Biden’s EOs should be concerning to all Americans. Couple that with the sheer volume of EOs he has signed and Americans should be very worried. Projections from UC Santa Barbara’s The Presidency Project estimates that if President Biden continues at his current EO signing pace he will average 160 EOs a year. Putting that into perspective, Trump averaged 55, Obama 35, Bush (43) 36, and Clinton 46. Moreover, the first ten US Presidents signed a total of 57 EOs.
Lawmakers, stakeholders, and citizens need to continue to shine a light on the negative impact President Biden’s EOs are having on the US and the core values we hold as a nation.
Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore
More from Americans for Tax Reform
House Republican Ways and Means Members Push Back on Job-Killing Tax Hikes and Wasteful Spending

Yesterday, the House Ways and Means Committee held a hearing exploring Biden's plan to raise taxes by $3.5 trillion for new "infrastructure" spending. During this hearing, entitled “Leveraging the Tax Code for Infrastructure Investment," House Republicans pointed out the main ways Biden's tax increases would harm working families and small businesses.
While Democrats touted their support for lavish green energy tax credits and attempted to convince the American people that their tax hikes would only be felt by the “ultra-rich,” Republican members shed light on the reality of the plan: it will hurt job growth, small businesses, working families, and hardly contains real infrastructure spending.
Biden's tax hikes would harm workers as the economy recovers from the pandemic.
Ranking Member Kevin Brady (R-Texas) explained how Biden’s infrastructure plan is comprised, not only of wasteful spending, but of crippling tax hikes:
“As bad as the wasteful spending is, worse-yet, [the infrastructure plan] is poisoned with crippling tax increases that sabotage America’s job recovery, hurts working families and main street businesses, and drives U.S. jobs overseas. We cannot fund infrastructure on the backs of American workers… Coming out of a pandemic, that is the last thing we need right now. No president has ever raised taxes on businesses to recover from an economic crisis.”
American workers bear a significant portion of the cost of higher corporate taxes. Numerous studies have found that between 50 percent and 70 percent of the corporate tax is borne workers, with the remaining being borne by consumers through higher prices and shareholders. In this way, Rep. Brady is correct in saying that these tax increases would sabotage job recovery and send jobs overseas.
Further, American voters share Rep. Brady’s sentiment: coming out of a pandemic, tax hikes are the last thing this nation needs. According to a poll conducted by HarrisX and commissioned by Americans for Tax Reform, 80 percent of voters say that now is not the right time to raise taxes because many businesses and individuals have not yet recovered. Only 20 percent of voters say now is the right time to raise taxes for new spending projects.
Family-owned businesses and entrepreneurs would be harmed by the second death tax and capital gains tax hike.
Both Rep. Adrian Smith (R-Neb.) and Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.) also explained how doubling the capital gains tax and repealing step-up in basis, thus creating a second death tax, would hurt investment, family-owned businesses, farms, and other small businesses.
Biden’s repeal of stepped-up basis means that Americans will be forced to pay a capital gains tax on decades of “gains” that are actually just inflation. Because many family-owned businesses are asset rich but cash poor, under the current law families already have to liquidate equipment, land, and other assets in order to pay the Death Tax. The second death tax will compound this problem, forcing family-owned businesses to sell a significant portion of their business or go into significant debt to pay their tax liability.
The capital gains tax creates a lock-in effect, discouraging investors from investing in small start-up companies in an effort to delay paying a steep tax. Increasing the tax will compound this effect and increase the cost of capital, decreasing new investment. In turn, this will harm business creation, business expansion, entrepreneurship, and threaten jobs and wages.
The President's "infrastructure" plan contains little infrastructure spending.
Later in the hearing, Rep. Vern Buchanan (R-Fla.) made it clear that Biden’s plan hardly includes real infrastructure spending:
“We agree the crumbling state of our nation’s infrastructure must be addressed, but what we disagree on is what is infrastructure and how to pay for it. The President’s infrastructure plan focuses on anything but infrastructure... Green energy tax credits for people buying a Tesla is not infrastructure.”
According to some estimates, less than 13 percent of the spending plan is spent on traditional infrastructure including less than 6 percent on roads and bridges, less than 2 percent on waterways, locks, dams, ports, and airports, and less than 5 percent on broadband. A “fact check” by the Washington Post argued that this analysis was misleading. They instead calculated that only about one-quarter (25%) of the Biden plan is spent on traditional infrastructure. Clearly, a vast majority of this spending will go to other projects.
Rep. Buchanan goes on to highlight a new study by economists John W. Diamond and George R. Zodrow, commissioned by the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), which found that Biden’s tax hikes would eliminate one million jobs in the first two years, and eliminate 600,000 jobs per year over the first decade.
Biden's tax hikes would make the U.S. globally uncompetitive.
During the hearing, several members also asserted that Biden’s tax hikes would make the United States uncompetitive.
The U.S. currently has a combined capital gains rate of over 29 percent inclusive of the 3.8 percent Obamacare tax and the 5.4 percent state average capital gains rate. Under Biden, this rate would approach 50 percent. This would give the U.S. a capital gains tax that is significantly higher than foreign competitors, with China’s rate at 20 percent and OECD’s weighted average rate at 23.2 percent.
The U.S. federal corporate tax rate is currently at 21 percent. However, states also levy their own corporate tax rates, averaging an additional 6 percent. Because this state tax is deductible when paying the federal corporate rate, the combined national and subnational rate averages out to 25.77 percent. A 28 percent federal rate, which Biden has proposed, would therefore result in a combined federal and state rate of 32 percent. Meanwhile. China’s corporate income tax rate is 25 percent, while the OECD average corporate tax rate is 23.51 percent.
ATR applauds the House Republican members of the Ways and Means Committee for pushing back against the Democrats’ narrative that these changes in the tax code will only hurt the “ultra-rich.” In fact, the effects of these policies will be largely felt by workers, consumers, and small businesses.
Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore
Lawmakers Should Support Braun and McConnell's 'Don't Weaponize the IRS Act'

Today, Senator Mike Braun (R-Ind.) and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) introduced the Don’t Weaponize the IRS Act, which has garnered the support of 43 Senate Republicans. This bill will codify important protections for non-profit organizations irrespective of their political affiliation and ensure that the IRS has one less tool to harass Americans that are exercising their first amendment rights.
H.R.1 would repeal these protections, providing the Biden administration with ammunition to attack conservative organizations, the same way they were attacked under the Obama administration.
Specifically, this bill would codify the final Rule issued by the Trump administration protecting tax-exempt organizations from unnecessary filing requirements. The Trump Rule ensured that many tax-exempt entities including 501(c)(4)s and 501(c)(6)s do not have to provide the IRS with a list of donors. This list is not used by the IRS for any official purpose. Instead, it creates needless compliance costs on both non-profits and the IRS. Last year, when the Rule was finalized, the Institute for Free Speech estimated that nonprofits would save about $63 million per year compliance costs if Schedule B were fully repealed.
If Democrats repeal this protection, it will create a new way for the IRS to harass organizations based on their political beliefs. Under the Obama administration, there were several cases where agency officials leaked the sensitive information contained on Schedule B forms for political purposes, such as leaking of the schedule B belonging to the National Organization for Marriage.
During this time, the IRS also wrongly used its authority to target and harass taxpayers, especially conservative non-profits. Most notably, the Obama IRS was caught unfairly denying conservative groups non-profit status ahead of the 2012 election.
Lois Lerner’s political beliefs led to tea party and conservative groups receiving disparate and unfair treatment when applying for non-profit status, according to a detailed report compiled by the Senate Finance Committee. Because of Lerner’s bias, only one conservative organization was granted tax exempt status over a period of more than three years.
Since these scandals, the IRS has done little to fix the problem. A 2016 report by the Government Accountability Office warned that the IRS may still be unfairly targeting non-profits “based on an organization’s religious, educational, political, or other views.”
Contrary to opponents’ claims, these protections do not limit transparency. In fact, the same information is still available to the public as before. There are already measures in place to track foreign donations. Even in the unlikely case that the IRS did suspect laws were being broken, it has no authority to share the information it collects with the FCC and the DOJ, the two agencies with the ability to enforce campaign finance laws.
Lawmakers should support Sens. Braun and McConnell’s Don’t Weaponize the IRS Act. The IRS has no official use for this kind of sensitive information. It can only be used for bad.
Photo Credit: Senator Mike Braun
Treasury Confirms: Biden Plans to Hire 87,000 New IRS Agents, Enough to Fill Nats Park Twice

President Joe Biden wants to hire 86,852 new IRS agents, which would more than double the agency’s workforce.
To put this into perspective:
- With 86,852 IRS agents, you could fill Nationals Park twice.
- 86,852 IRS agents is more than the population of Biden’s hometown of Wilmington, Delaware which has a population of 70,644.
Even Obama-era IRS chief John Koskinen – a longtime advocate of increasing the IRS budget – thinks President Joe Biden’s proposal to increase IRS funding by $80 billion is too much.
As reported by the New York Times:
“I’m not sure you’d be able to efficiently use that much money,” Mr. Koskinen said in an interview. “That’s a lot of money.”
Rather than fix the agency's longstanding mismanagement, ineptitude and abuse problems, Biden's approach will make the problem worse.
Numerous watchdog reports have found that the agency’s inability to do its job is due to incompetence, not lack of funding:
- A Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) report on the 2021 Filing Season found that almost 40 percent of printers were not working at tax processing centers in Ogden, Utah and Kansas City, Missouri. However, in many cases the only thing wrong with the printers is that no employee had replaced the ink or emptied the waste cartridge container: “IRS employees stated that the only reason they could not use many of these devices is because they are out of ink or because the waste cartridge container is full.”
- This year, despite having funding for new hires, the IRS only achieved 37 percent of their hiring goal. They had trouble onboarding new hires as well, as it was “difficult to find working copiers (as noted previously) to be able to prepare training packages.”
- The National Taxpayer Advocate’s 2018 Annual Report to Congress noted that the IRS was ranked last out of 15 federal agencies in its ability to provide quality communication. The report notes that taxpayers trying to reach the IRS are often “left floundering on the rocks of confusion, frustration, and misinformation.”
- The National Taxpayer Advocate’s 2020 report to Congress noted that the IRS has failed to hire over 5,000 full time employees for which it had allocated funding. This was because of the agency’s disorganization, incompetence, and the existence of labor union rules that promote needless bureaucracy.
- In 2016, the IRS has lost track of laptops containing sensitive taxpayer data. TIGTA estimates that the IRS had failed to properly document the return of 84.2 percent, or more than 1,000 computers due to be returned by contract employees.
- A TIGTA report in 2017 showed that the IRS rehired more than 200 employees who were previously employed by the agency, but fired for previous conduct or performance issues.
- Each year the IRS hangs up on millions of callers -- a practice they refer to as “Courtesy Disconnects.” Currently, if you call the IRS, you have a 1-in-50 chance of reaching a human being.
- According to the National Taxpayer Advocate’s 2014 Annual Report to Congress the IRS was unable to justify spending decisions. As the report stated: "The IRS lacks a principled basis for making the difficult resource allocation decisions necessitated by today’s tight budget environment.”
- The agency has repeatedly failed to compile legally required tax complexity reports. These reports are supposed to contain the IRS's specific recommendations on how to make the tax code easier to comply with. Since 1998, the IRS has done so just twice – in 2000 and 2002.
- In 2015, the IRS was spending $1,000 an hour hiring a litigation-only white shoe law firm for an investigation, despite having over 40,000 employees dedicated to enforcement efforts.
- In 2015, the agency has been caught red-handed wasting taxpayer dollars on Nerf footballs, the world’s largest crossword puzzle, extravagant $100 dollar lunches, and more.
The last thing the IRS needs is more power and responsibility. In fact, it is likely that new responsibilities will become overwhelming for the IRS, leading to these new scandals and new cases of taxpayer abuse.
While the IRS continues to blame its poor performance on a lack of taxpayer funding, the real problem is the inability of the agency to competently complete basic tasks and spend taxpayer dollars in a responsible way.
Photo Credit: Geoff Livingston




















