Americans for Tax Reform

Weathering The Storm: ATR’s Post-Pandemic State Policy Guide

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Americans for Tax Reform on Thursday, June 25th, 2020, 4:37 PM PERMALINK

State legislatures across the country are either in session or will be convening sessions in the coming weeks and months - some of them special sessions and others the resumption of those suspended earlier this year. As governors and legislators return to work facing new challenges in the aftermath of the pandemic, Americans for Tax Reform is offering a list of policy recommendations for elected officials to consider.  

ATR’s recommendations fall into two main categories: 

1) Balancing budgets without raising taxes & reforms that stimulate economic growth.  

2) The codification of deregulatory reforms enacted by executive order in response to the pandemic that should be continued in perpetuity. 

Step 1: First Do No Harm, Balance Budgets Without Tax Hikes

It is certain that some governors, lawmakers, and interest groups, in both blue and red states, will call for various tax hikes in response to the pandemic-driven drop in state and local tax collections. A number of such proposals have already been put forth and are being debated, such as the progressive income tax hike that will be on the Illinois ballot this fall, the $12 billion property tax hike in California that Joe Biden has endorsed, the income tax hike the Colorado progressives are pushing on the November ballot, and the additional $4 billion in annual tax hikes on businesses proposed by Golden State Governor Gavin Newsom (D) as part of his revised budget plan, just to name a few examples. 

More than 20 million Americans are now unemployed amid the pandemic-driven recession. Thousands of businesses have closed down entirely. The last thing individuals, families, and employers can afford right now is a mid-recession tax hike that would reduce household income and diminish the job-sustaining capacity of employers at a time when many businesses are struggling to keep their doors open. 

Aside from the economic harm a mid-recession tax hike would inflict, raising taxes would also be a politically perilous move amid the current downturn. A recent PPP poll out of California, no bastion of conservatism, found 80% of those surveyed oppose raising taxes as a way to shore up state government revenues. 

Aside from the fact that raising taxes would depress economic growth at a time when reforms that instead accelerate growth are what’s desperately needed right now, the data make clear that a downward adjustment in the trajectory of state spending was needed even before the pandemic-driven downturn arrived. 

Total state government spending data for all 50 states shows that spending spending as been growing at an unsustainable clip for years, well in excess of the rate of population and inflation. Since 2000, total state spending has increased by 118%. Had all 50 states grown government spending in line with population and inflation during that period, total state spending in 2018 would’ve been nearly half a trillion dollars less than was the case that year. 

In addition to first doing no harm by stopping efforts to raise taxes, ATR recommends that state lawmakers consider the following policy proposals and proactive reforms as way to stoke economic growth. In addition to stimulating economic growth, ATR’s post-pandemic policy recommendations, if adopted, would help businesses and workers recover following the lifting of state lockdown orders.   

Proactive, Pro-Growth Post-Pandemic Policy Recommendations

1) Exempt forgiven PPP loans from state taxation. 

2) Defer or extend deferral of property and excises tax payments, particularly for businesses in the hardest hit sectors. 

3) Bag taxes and bans should be repealed. Grocery store employees have been on the front lines in the fight against the spread of the novel coronavirus. These critical and vulnerable workers shouldn’t be forced to handle reusable shopping bags that scientific researchers have found can act as Petri dishes for bacteria and carriers of harmful pathogens. Yet that is the result of well-meaning but misguided laws on the books in states and localities across the U.S. 

The eight states where lawmakers have imposed plastic bag prohibitions are California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, New York, Oregon and Vermont, according the National Conference of State Legislatures. Six of those statewide bag bans were enacted as recently as 2019. Hundreds of cities, towns, and counties have also imposed a bag ban or tax. All of these laws seek to force or encourage the use of reusable shopping bags, which pose a public health risk at any time and especially during the current pandemic. 

Many bag taxes and bans have been suspended during the pandemic, even in blue states. Even after the pandemic is passed, legislators should move to permanently repeal statewide bag taxes and bans where they exist, in addition to preempting local bag taxes and bans. 

4) Consider tax limitation measures like Texas’s 3.5% property tax rollback rate, which prevents property tax revenues from growing in excess of 3.5% annually. Just this week this taxpayer protection measure put a stop to an effort in Dallas to raise property tax revenue by more than 8%. 

  • In addition to the Texas property tax rollback rate, which was lowered last year from 8% to 3.5%, California’s Prop. 13 property tax cap is another effective way to protect taxpayers from unaffordable increases in property tax bills. In addition to subjecting all tax hikes to a 2/3rds legislative supermajority vote, Prop. 13, approved by California voters 1978, also limits annual increases in the taxable value of a property, both personal and commercial, to the inflation rate or 2%, whichever is less. Transferred properties are reassessed at 1% of their sale price.
  • Colorado’s Taxpayer Bill of Right (TABOR) is another tax and spending limitation measure that other states should considering adopting. TABOR caps the growth in state spending at the combined rate of population growth and inflation. TABOR also subjects all tax hikes to voter approval, protecting taxpayers against not just property tax hikes, but all tax increases. In addition to raising the bar to enact a tax increase, any state that enacts TABOR will be in a better position to weather any future recession or depression.

 

5) Another reform for lawmakers to consider is Truth in Taxation, which has proven effective at keeping property tax rates down, largely through public accountability. One of the great challenges of property tax reform is that local officials will still raise taxes following reform, and voters often are not aware. 

  • Truth in Taxation ensures that citizens know when votes to increase property taxes are happening through multiple notifications. 
  • The policy accomplishes a very challenging goal: getting the public engaged. Since tax hikes are not popular, few are approved when the public is engaged. Utah’s Truth in Taxation also automatically reduces rates to compensate for rising valuations, so the tax burden does not automatically increase without government action. It’s never a good idea to have a tax hike on auto-pilot. 

 

6) Enact tort reform limiting the legal liability of businesses when it comes to COVID-19-related lawsuits. It will be impossible for the economy to fully recover if businesses have to worry about being sued by trial lawyers over COVID-19-related accusations. 

State legislators can also expand access to health care and reduce consumer inconvenience through expansion of vaccine and testing administration authority. As pharmacists and dental care providers work to rebuild their businesses following the lifting of emergency state restrictions, expect more governors and state lawmakers to consider a reform recently enacted in one state that empowers dental providers to administer COVID-19 diagnostic and antibody testing.  

A pandemic relief bill approved with bipartisan support in the North Carolina General Assembly in early May includes a novel provision, one that allows dentists to administer COVID-19 diagnostic and antibody testing. This, along with legislation that permit pharmacists to administer more vaccines, are reforms that help not only with response to the current pandemic, but are good ideas that will expand access to and reduce the cost of care moving forward. 

Permanent Codification of Certain Emergency Deregulatory Actions

In response to the pandemic and the unique challenges it presents, nearly 600 deregulatory actions have been implemented at the federal and state levels.Many of these deregulatory actions are beneficial even beyond the pandemic and should be continued in perpetuity. 

Congressman Chip Roy (R-Texas) has introduced federal legislation that would continue the deregulatory actions ordered by the Trump administration in response to the pandemic. Likewise, legislative codification of many emergency actions issued by governors in response to the pandemic is something state legislators should pursue as they return to state capitols in the coming weeks and months. 

It’s clear that many of these regulations that have been suspended by emergency order were never needed to begin with and often served predominantly protectionist, anti-consumer purposes. The following is a rundown of deregulatory actions ordered by governors since March that state legislators should look to enshrine into law moving forward: 

There is great need for lawmakers to repeal Certificate of Need laws. 35 states impose Certificate of Need (CON) regulations, many of which have been temporarily suspended by gubernatorial executive order, by governors from both parties. 

Thanks to an executive order issued by Governor Andrew Cuomo (D-N.Y.) to waive the Empire State’s CON regulations, for example, hospitals no longer need to request the state’s approval before changing their physical plants in various ways, such as temporarily increasing their bed capacity. Similar orders have been issued by governors in ConnecticutMichiganVirginia, and more than a dozen other states. State legislator would do well to codify the permanent repeal of these CON laws. Doing so will help expand access to health care and reduce patient costs.  

7) Expand access to and utilization of telemedicine. At least 10 governors, including Govs. Chris Sununu (R-N.H.) and John Bel Edwards (D-La.), have issued orders expanding the use of telemedicine during COVID-19. Expansion of telemedicine has alleviated the burden on hospital and other medical facilities, while also reducing the number of coronavirus cases that would have otherwise been contracted or spread in a doctor’s office or hospital.

Telemedicine is also making health care more accessible to patients, particularly for those in rural areas or who need specialists, as the nearest provider may be several hours away. Decades after the invention of the phone and the internet, one should not have to trudge down to the doctor’s office to ask a question. Legislators should consider lasting codification of emergency actions that temporary expanded access to telemedicine. 

8) Allow medical professionals to practice across state lines. Despite the fact that those licensed to practice in one state are just as capable as those licensed to practice in another, state laws make it very difficult for them to help out in areas that may be more overwhelmed by COVID-19. To address this problem, a number of governors have called for some form of licensing reciprocity.

Govs. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.) & Jared Polis (D-Colo.), for example, are letting certain health-care professionals, those who are in good standing in other states where they are licensed, temporarily practice in Florida and Colorado. This approach is slightly different from legislation that was approved by the Florida legislature last year, which allows medical professionals licensed to practice in other states to provide telemedicine services in Florida without a Florida license.

A driver’s license is good in all states. Professional sports players do not need to prove in every state that they can play baseball or football or basketball. Why do medical professionals need a license in every state?

The time is ripe for Occupational Licensing Reform. The pandemic has shined a bright light on occupational licensing rules that restrict peoples’ ability to work and to do so across state lines. Hard hit states have waived rules so out-of-state health care workers can cross state lines to treat patients. Some states have also relaxed hour and testing requirements so retired physicians can pitch in and nursing students can more easily obtain their initial license. These pandemic-driven deregulatory actions show the questionable necessity of many state licensing restrictions, and will spark permanent reform in some places.

9) Universal occupational license recognition (or reciprocity), an example of such a reform, is a policy that allows someone who has earned a license in one state, and has kept it in good standing, to work in another state without having to go through training and certification all over again. If nurses can safely go from one state to another, surely barbers, and landscapers can as well. Arizona and a handful of other states have passed legislation along these lines. Others states are now looking to follow suit, and Iowa just became the most recent to do so. 

In mid-June the Iowa legislature passed Representative Shannon Lundgren’s (R) House File 2627 sending it to Governor Kim Reynolds (R) to sign. This makes Iowa the seventh state to pass a universal license recognition bill. Once implemented, HF 2627 will allow new Iowans to use the training and skills they already have without additional red tape. 

Iowa’s bill also waives initial licensing fees for any first-time applicants from families that earn less than 200 percent of the federal poverty level and applies criminal justice reforms to the licensure process, creating a uniform standard of review for those who have their licensed denied based on conviction history. These important provisions will make it easier for low-income households and the formerly incarcerated to get jobs and provide for their families. 

“We all know heavy regulations serve as a red tape tax that impacts Iowa’s working class,” said Chris Ingstad, president of Iowans for Tax Relief. “Occupational licensing laws make it more difficult and more expensive for Iowans to earn a living and fill high-demand jobs. The changes passed by the legislature in House File 2627 put Iowans ahead of the special interests.”

Arizona, Montana, Pennsylvania, Utah, and Idaho have also enacted a version of universal license recognition. Earlier this year Missouri legislature sent Representative Derek Grier’s (R) univeral recognition bill, House Bill 2046, to Governor Mike Parson (R), who is expected to sign it into law. 

10) A sunset review process is a great way to shift the burden of proof from workers, who are trying to earn a living, to the licensing boards. State lawmakers and governors should take a hard look at all of their existing licenses and question whether the training requirements, and the license itself is truly necessary to protect public safety. A policy like Ohio’s recently-enacted sunset review process requires boards to show their licenses are needed to protect public safety. The legislature is proactively reviewing all of the state’s licenses, about one-third are considered at a time. Even better, state licensing boards sunset if not renewed by the legislature within six years.

11) Remove pointless, counterproductive “Scope of Practice” restrictions. “Scope of practice” refers to the activities a practitioner is legally authorized to engage in. These laws often are nothing more than a way to shut out competition in the medical field by preventing certain providers from practicing at their full capacity.

Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) and Physician’s Assistants (PAs), for example, are often restricted in their ability to practice by state laws that require them to have collaborative agreements in place with physicians.

APRNs and PAs are highly educated, thoroughly trained medical professionals who can examine, diagnose, and treat injuries and illnesses. They can also prescribe medication and be primary care providers. Yet, in many states, unless they have a collaborative agreement – a permission slip from a doctor, APRNs and PAs are not allowed to practice or have limited ability to practice. This ultimately hurts patients, who are left with fewer options, less access to care, and higher costs.States should remove these pointless barriers and allow APRNs and PAs to utilize the full scope of their education and training.  

Removing unnecessary barriers to the sale of alcohol is a great way to raise revenue without raising taxes. State and local governments across the nation impose a number of regulations on the sale of spirits, wine, and beer. Unfortunately, many of the restrictions in place have nothing to do with public safety concerns but instead have everything to do with protecting politically well-connected entities from competition. As a result of these protectionist regulations, several states have knee-capped industry expansion and economic growth.

However, in response to the Covid-19 pandemic, state lawmakers and governors have temporarily lifted these restrictions in order to mitigate the economic hardship that has befallen restaurants, breweries, distillers, etc. Not only will these de-regulatory efforts help soften the economic blow on businesses, but they will also enable states to reap additional revenue through expansion of commerce and economic growth, not by raising taxes.

Rather than pile a new round of state level tax increases in response to the pandemic-driven drop in state and local tax collections, state lawmakers should instead generate revenue by making the following de-regulatory actions permanent:

12) Legalize the direct shipment of alcohol to consumers.

  • Lawmakers should consider enacting legislation that allows spirits, beer, and wine producers to ship directly to consumers. For instance Kentucky state lawmakers passed House Bill 415 at the end of March, which will provide the Bluegrass State’s bourbon industry a much-needed boost.
  • As of the start of 2020, the District of Columbia, Arizona, Florida, Hawaii, Nebraska and New Hampshire, permit the direct shipment of spirits. Eight states permit the direct shipment of beer and wine: Delaware, Massachusetts, Montana, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Vermont and Virginia. The rest of the states only allow direct shipments of wine.

 

13) Permit restaurants and distillers to sell beer, cocktails, wine, and spirits to-go and for delivery.

  • Lawmakers should consider allowing the delivery and sale of alcohol to-go like Gov. Gregg Abbott’s (R- Texas) waiver permits in the Lone Star State. Governor Abbott’s order, and similar orders issued by other governors, allow restaurants to sell beer, wine, or mixed drinks for delivery and pick-up orders as long as the order is accompanied by food purchased from the restaurant. As Texas reopens, Gov. Abbott is allowing alcohol-to-go sales to continue and said in a tweet that, Texas may just let this keep on going forever. Other states should consider that approach.
  • Virginia, New York, Maryland, California, Illinois, Colorado, Colorado, Atlanta, Kentucky, and Washington, D.C. are a few other states that have also eased restrictions to expand access to alcohol via restaurant delivery and to-go orders. Legislators should pass legislation to codify this new liberty on an ongoing basis. The food and beverage industry has been hit hard in the recent pandemic.
  • Permitting to-go and delivery sales of alcohol is a great way for lawmakers to help businesses by getting government out of their way.

 

14) Modernize prohibition-era liquor laws by allowing grocery stores, convenience stores, and big-box retailers to acquire liquor licenses. 

  • Voters have consistently supported expanding liquor licensing laws. Take for instance, voter-approved Oklahoma’s state question 792, which allows convenience, grocery, and drug stores to sell and refrigerate beer up to 8.99 percent alcohol and wine up to 14.99 percent alcohol. SQ 792 passed by a 30 point margin. Allowing more businesses to sell beer, wine, and spirits is a fantastic way to increase tax collections without raising taxes, all while making life more convenient for constituents.

Photo Credit: John Rogers


Proven Tax Hiker Luke Rankin Faces Challenger For South Carolina Senate Seat

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Americans for Tax Reform on Friday, June 19th, 2020, 6:15 PM PERMALINK

There is a reason why South Carolina, despite being considered a solid red Republican-dominated state, is home to the highest income tax rates in the southeast. It’s because too many of the Republicans in positions of power in the state legislature in Columbia, some of them former Democrats, are simply not conservative.

One of the liberal Republican senators who works to keep South Carolina’s business tax climate uncompetitive, Senator Luke Rankin (R), is now fighting for his political life in a hotly contested primary runoff. Rankin’s loss would remove one of the impediments to pro-growth, conservative reform in the Palmetto State.

Republicans in South Carolina’s 33rd Senate District, home to Myrtle Beach, will head to the polls this coming Tuesday, June 23rd to decide the fate of longtime incumbent Senator Luke Rankin. Rankin received only 41.37 percent of the vote in the June 9 primary, forcing a runoff with challenger John Gallman, a financial advisor running to improve the composition of the South Carolina Senate.

Senator Rankin has been in power for almost 30 years and is attempting to run on his record. But his record is precisely what drew challengers in the first place. In particular, Rankin voted to impose a sizable gas tax hike three years ago by overriding Governor Henry McMaster’s veto.

When all is said and done, this Rankin-approved tax hike will have deprived taxpayers of roughly $1.8 billion over the first five years of its implementation, and will drain the economy of hundreds of millions more each year after that.

Rankin faced two challengers in the June 9th primary who collectively received nearly 60 percent of the vote. It appears that voters in this heavily Republican district want an alternative to the tax-hiking incumbent.

Rankin’s poor performance in the June 9 primary marked a significant drop-off in support compared to previous elections. In the 2016 primary, Rankin handily won the GOP nomination with 55.88 percent of the vote. In 2012, he didn’t even draw a primary challenger. What’s changed since previous elections is that Senator Rankin has imposed a regressive tax hike that’s costing South Carolinians at a time when many can least afford it.

John Gallman has understandably criticized Rankin for supporting the 2017 gas tax hike. “Luke Rankin was behind the gas tax, which is the largest tax increase we’ve ever had,” Gallman said. Gallman has joined Governor Henry McMaster in signing the Taxpayer Protection Pledge, a written commitment to South Carolina taxpayers that he will oppose any and all efforts to raise taxes.

Senator Rankin’s campaign website says he works “to build consensus to fund the highest priorities for our State – without raising taxes,” yet his record makes clear that’s not true.

On Tuesday, June 23 voters in South Carolina’s 33rd state senate district will choose between a proven tax hiker in Senator Luke Rankin, or John Gallman, a fiscal conservative who has joined Governor Henry McMaster in pledging to protect South Carolina taxpayers.

Photo Credit: Jimmy Emmerson


California Governor Gavin Newsom Proposes Multi-Billion Dollar, Mid-Recession Tax Hike

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Americans for Tax Reform on Monday, May 18th, 2020, 8:13 PM PERMALINK

In a new article published in Forbes today, ATR’s Patrick Gleason writes about how across the U.S. there “are many examples of companies that have volunteered their expertise and capabilities to help the country get through the pandemic.”
 
Gleason’s article reports on the various ways companies have helped with the pandemic response. Some have done so by stepping outside of their commercial comfort zone, redirecting operations to the production of goods and services they previously did not make or provide, such as face masks and other personal protective equipment. Other businesses are helping society weather the pandemic by focusing on their core business functions and competencies, be that the researching of vaccines or the provision of data.
 
These businesses are stepping up to help the country get through the pandemic at the same time they are seeing their bottom line’s take huge hits and are subsequently forced to trim payroll (something government officials refuse to do themselves). It is in this context that some governors and mayors are seeking to saddle employers with tax increases that will further reduce their job sustaining capacity.
 
California Governor Gavin Newsom (D), for example, recently released a revised budget proposal for the coming fiscal year that starts in July. Newsom’s new budget proposal raises taxes on employers by $4.5 billion annually through a “temporary” suspension of net operating loss deductions, along with a prohibition of research and development tax credits.
 
In addition to this new multi-billion dollar tax hike that would hit employers at a time when many can least afford it, Governor Newsom’s revised budget maintains his previous proposal for a new tax on vaping products projected to generate about $33 million annually.
 
“Lawmakers will debate the plan over the next few weeks and must enact a budget by June 15,” Bloomberg Tax reported last week. “Newsom must sign it by the start of the fiscal year July 1.”
 
Governor Newsom’s proposals aren’t the only major tax threats facing California employers. This November Golden State voters will decide the fate of a government union and Democrat Party-backed ballot measure that, if approved, would raise property taxes on businesses by approximately $12 billion annually. This massive tax hike, which has been endorsed by presumed Democrat presidential nominee Joe Biden, would remove Prop. 13’s constitutional property tax cap for commercial businesses.
 
This is the first installment in a new series examining the most economically-damaging tax hikes that have been proposed in the middle of this pandemic-driven recession.
 

Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore


New York Governor Andrew Cuomo Is Sending A Tax Bill To Out-Of-State Emergency Health Workers.

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Americans for Tax Reform on Friday, May 8th, 2020, 12:25 PM PERMALINK

In Forbes today, ATR’s Patrick Gleason has a new article that covers the way in which New York Governor Andrew Cuomo (D) is holding out-of-state volunteer workers financially hostage in and attempt to get more money from the federal government.

“Governor Cuomo’s remarks, in which he referred to the prospect of not taxing out-of-state volunteer health workers as a ‘subsidy,’ indicate that he would reconsider this approach only if the federal government sends more money to New York,” Gleason writes.

This latest ploy - in which Cuomo is using emergency volunteer health workers as a bargaining chip to get more federal aid on top of the more than $7 billion New York received through the CARES Act - is consistent with the Cuomo administration’s long history of corruption and malfeasance with taxpayer dollars.

To read the article in its entirety, click here.

Photo Credit: Zack Seward


ATR Applauds Governor Larry Hogan For Defending Maryland Taxpayers

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Americans for Tax Reform on Thursday, May 7th, 2020, 4:23 PM PERMALINK

Americans for Tax Reform applauds Maryland Governor Larry Hogan (R) for his vetoes today of two job-killing, business-harming tax hikes that were approved in March by the Democrat-controlled Maryland General Assembly.

The tax increases vetoed by Governor Hogan today include House Bill 732, legislation that imposes a new tax on digital advertising similar to what a number of European nations are calling for, along with a tax hike on tobacco and vaping products. Governor Hogan also vetoed House Bill 932, which applies the state sales tax to digital goods and services such as e-books, streamed movies and music. 

“Governor Larry Hogan has wisely used his veto power to protect individuals, families, and employers across Maryland from a misguided tax increase that, in addition to burdening businesses with added costs at a time when many simply cannot afford it, would’ve triggered a costly legal challenge that would’ve unnecessarily squandered scarce taxpayer resources at a time when state government is facing unprecedented demands,” said Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax.

Many were surprised in March when Democrats who control the Maryland General Assembly passed these controversial tax hikes at a time when it was already clear that the pandemic-driven downturn was pushing many businesses to the brink.

“The fact that the Maryland legislature is dumping these tax proposals on them at this time of crisis is really something to be upset about,” Jeff Friedman, a partner at Eversheds Sutherland’s Washington D.C. office, told Bloomberg Tax shortly after Maryland lawmakers approved the digital ad tax last month.

Maryland state lawmakers recently announced that they will not return to Annapolis in May for a veto session, so Governor Hogan's vetoes today will protect Maryland employers and families from these tax threats for the time being. 


Toledo Voters Resoundingly Reject Income Tax Hike

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Americans for Tax Reform on Wednesday, April 29th, 2020, 12:45 PM PERMALINK

On Tuesday April 28, during an Ohio primary election that was delayed on account of the pandemic, voters in Toledo, the Buckeye State’s fourth most populous city, rejected Issue 1, a 22% local income tax hike supported by Toledo Mayor Wade Kapszukiewicz. More than 55% of the electorate ended up voting No on Issue 1.

Issue 1, had it passed, would’ve raised the local income tax rate from 2.25% to 2.75%. This half a percentage point, 22% rate hike would’ve hit individuals, families, and small businesses at a time when many are struggling to weather the coronavirus-driven downturn.

The Toledo Mayor’s proposed income tax hike was defeated despite the fact that the Yes campaign heavily outspent the tax hike’s opposition. Approximately $165,000 was spent in support of Issue 1, versus $3,000 spent in opposition, most of it by the Lucas County Young Republicans. Americans for Tax Reform also contributed to voter education efforts.

“Toledoans have spoken loudly and clearly: They’re paying close attention to city government, and they are not buying what this administration is selling,” the Lucas County Young Republicans noted in a statement released on election night. “An income tax increase that was sold as a plan to fix the roads was instead a method of enriching special interests with no oversight.”

Some see this outcome in Toledo, located in a county where most voters cast ballots for Hillary Clinton in 2016, as a bellwether for what to expect from voters later this year. If so, that could be cause for Democrat concern.

That’s because the presumptive Democrat nominee for president, Joe Biden, is running on a proposal entailing trillions of dollars in higher federal taxes, including much higher income tax rates. There are many candidates and officeholders for state and local office who, like Biden, are campaigning on proposals that call for a much higher overall tax burden.

If voters in other cities and states are as disinterested in tax hikes as are voters in Toledo, that spells trouble for Democrats up and down the ballot.

“Taxpayers in Toledo spoke loud and clear on April 28. A tax hike is the last thing that taxpayers and the economy need right now,” said Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform.

“Issue 1 would’ve reduced the job creating capacity of small businesses at a time when most are struggling to stay in existence,” Norquist added. “Toledo voters saved more than their own hard-earned income by rejecting Issue 1. They saved jobs.”

Photo Credit: David Grant


Map Of States With Delayed Tax Filing Deadlines

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Americans for Tax Reform on Tuesday, March 24th, 2020, 4:50 PM PERMALINK

The Internal Revenue Service recently announced that the upcoming federal income tax filing deadline is moved from April 15 to July 15, 2020.

“Taxpayers can also defer federal income tax payments due on April 15, 2020, to July 15, 2020, without penalties and interest, regardless of the amount owed,” explains a March 21 statement released by the IRS. “This deferment applies to all taxpayers, including individuals, trusts and estates, corporations and other non-corporate tax filers as well as those who pay self-employment tax.”

Now state government officials across the U.S. are taking action to delay their tax filing deadlines in order to sync up with the extended federal deadline, which will help avoid taxpayer confusion and also increase household and small business liquidity at time of economic uncertainty.

The states shaded green on the above map have moved their filing deadline to the same as the new federal deadline of July 15. The five states colored yellow have delayed their filing deadlines but, to an extended date that is different than the new federal deadline of July 15. The extended dates for those five states are:

Hawaii - July 20

Idaho - June 20

Iowa - July 31

Mississippi - May 15

Virginia - June 1

The nine states shaded gray do not impose a state income tax. While Tennessee and New Hampshire do not tax wage income, they do tax investment income. The deadline to pay investment income taxes has been delayed in Tennessee, but not in New Hampshire


ATR Urges South Carolina Lawmakers To Sell Debt-Ridden, State-Owned Utility

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Americans for Tax Reform on Friday, January 24th, 2020, 7:34 PM PERMALINK

South Carolina lawmakers recently convened their 2020 session, during which they will debate a number of important issues, such as cutting the Southeast’s highest state income tax rate, and education reform that provides more choice to parents.

Among the most important issues to be debated in Columbia this year is what to do with Santee Cooper, the state-owned utility company that has accumulated billions of dollars in debt, much of it due to the failed V.C. Summer nuclear project fiasco. Americans for Tax Reform president Grover Norquist recently sent a letter to South Carolina lawmakers urging them to approve the sale of Santee Cooper to a buyer who will assume the utility’s debt.

“Of all the options put forth to date, only the sale of Santee Cooper has the potential to reduce or eliminate the enormous future costs to be borne by the ratepayers and provide the ability to protect ratepayers in the future,” explains a recently released by the Palmetto Promise Institute Report.

While the sale of Santee Cooper to a private entity is the best solution for South Carolina taxpayers, it’s critical that such a sale not result in ratepayers continuing to bear the cost of bad decisions made by officials at the state-owned utility through future rate hikes. As such, ATR is urging Palmetto State lawmakers to approve the sale of Santee Cooper before the current legislative session ends, and to do so in a manner that protects taxpayers, ratepayers, and eliminates the possibility of a taxpayer bailout.

ATR recently launched a digital ad campaign urging South Carolinians to sign a new petition that urges lawmakers to sell the state-owned utility to a private entity who will assume Santee Cooper’s debt, so that ratepayers and taxpayers aren’t stuck with the bill for a failed nuclear project.

To sign the petition, click here

 


Republicans Have Full Control of 22 States, Democrats 15


Posted by Americans for Tax Reform on Thursday, January 23rd, 2020, 2:00 PM PERMALINK

Republicans have full control of the legislative and executive branch in 22 states.
Democrats have full control of the legislative and executive branch in 15 states.

Population of the 22 fully R-controlled states: 132,338,323
Population of the 15 fully D-controlled states: 120,326,393

Republicans have full control of the legislative branch in 30 states.
Democrats have full control of the legislative branch in 19 states.

Population of the 30 fully R-controlled states: 184,536,246
Population of the 19 fully D-controlled states: 135,248,276

Click here for full-size versions of the map below.


North Carolina Lt. Governor Dan Forest, Who Is Challenging Governor Roy Cooper, Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Americans for Tax Reform on Tuesday, January 7th, 2020, 7:07 PM PERMALINK

Americans for Tax Reform applauds North Carolina Lt. Governor Dan Forest (R-NC) for becoming the first and so far only candidate running for Governor in North Carolina who has ruled out tax hikes if elected this November.

By signing the Taxpayer Protection Pledge, a written commitment to North Carolinians (not ATR) to oppose and veto any and all efforts to pass a net tax hike, Dan Forest has demonstrated the stark contrast between him and his opponent, incumbent Governor Roy Cooper, when it comes to taxes.

While Governor Roy Cooper has made clear that he would ratchet up income and other tax rates if only he had a Democrat-run General Assembly that would send such bills to his desk, Lt. Governor Dan Forest, by signing the Taxpayer Protection Pledge, has made clear that tax hikes will be a non-starter and off the table in the Old North State if voters put him in the Governor’s mansion in Raleigh this fall. 

Governor Roy Cooper has repeatedly stated and made clear that he would like to undo the personal and corporate income tax relief that has been enacted in North Carolina since Republicans took control of the General Assembly nearly a decade ago.

On January 1, 2019 North Carolina’s personal income tax rate dropped from 5.499% to 5.25%, while the state’s corporate rate dropped from 3.0% to 2.5%, the lowest corporate income tax rate among states that impose the levy. In the lead up to those income tax cuts last year, Governor Roy Cooper repeatedly urged state legislators to vote to stop that scheduled tax relief from taking effect. Fortunately for taxpayers, North Carolina lawmakers ignored Governor Cooper’s advice and went forward with that tax relief.

North Carolina is a presidential, senatorial, and gubernatorial battleground state in 2020. In addition to that, there are import state supreme courts seats up for election, along with all of the state legislative races that will determine which party controls redistricting post-2020 in a state that will be adding a congressional district. When it comes to the gubernatorial race, North Carolina taxpayers will have a clear and stark choice.

“I applaud Lt. Governor Dan Forest for making this important commitment to North Carolina taxpayers,” said Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform. “Governor Roy Cooper wants to undo the pro-growth tax reforms enacted in North Carolina in recent years, which have served as a model for the nation and allowed North Carolina families to keep billions of dollars in hard-earned income that would’ve otherwise gone toward government coffers. At the same time North Carolina lawmakers have returned billions to taxpayers, over the objections of Governor Cooper, North Carolina Republican legislators have smartly kept state spending in line with the rate of population growth and inflation. The result is that North Carolina, contrary to what Governor Cooper and his allies predicted, has realized repeated budget surpluses at the same time state lawmakers have returned billions to taxpayers, despite objections from Roy Cooper. 

"Lt. Governor Dan Forest’s pledge to taxpayers makes clear that unlike Governor Cooper - who wants to tear down the progress North Carolina has made with tax reform, school choice, and regulatory reform - Dan Forest would protect taxpayers and pursue pro-growth policies if elected governor.”

Photo Credit: Gerry Dincher


Pages

×