Americans for Tax Reform

ATR Supports Trump's Protection of American Intellectual Property

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Americans for Tax Reform on Wednesday, August 16th, 2017, 5:19 PM PERMALINK

In a recent announcement from the White House, President Donald Trump has followed through on his promises to protect American intellectual property rights. As a candidate, President Trump claimed that protecting intellectual property rights could “save millions of American jobs.” The recent Presidential Memorandum signing directs the United States Trade Representative to examine whether China should be investigated for “unreasonable or discriminatory policies that may harm American IP rights, innovation, or technological development.”

Americans for Tax Reform sent out a letter praising President Trump for his commitment to intellectual property rights. Americans for Tax Reform, along with 69 other groups, have agreed upon principles of which are the utmost importance in preserving intellectual property rights both at home and abroad. These principles include that IP rights are vital to job growth and economic competitiveness. We believe China has been particularly brazen in coopting American innovation and profiting from American investment in research, development, and intellectual capital. Practices by China to restrict market entrance and technology transfer have been a particular hindrance.

To see the letter ATR signed on to click here

Photo Credit: markgranitz

More from Americans for Tax Reform

ATR Launches Campaign to Stop Health Insurance Tax, Reinforce Need for Repeal of All ObamaCare Taxes

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Americans for Tax Reform on Wednesday, August 16th, 2017, 4:48 PM PERMALINK

Today, Americans for Tax Reform launched a significant campaign across a number of different electronic media, highlighting the need to stop those Obamacare taxes that haven't yet taken effect - particularly the Health Insurance Tax - while we work toward the repeal of all Obamacare taxes.

We need to get rid of all Obamacare taxes. Allowing more Obamacare taxes to go into effect should simply be out of the question.

The effort to fully abolish the Obamacare tax burden on families and businesses should be divided into two steps:

In the short-term, Congress must quickly act to ensure that the health insurance tax and medical device tax are delayed. Failing to act will mean both taxes go into effect at the end of 2018, which will cause costs to skyrocket even higher.

At the same time, lawmakers must continue to press for the repeal of all of the Obamacare trillion dollars in new or higher taxes. These taxes have increased healthcare costs, restricted access to care, and harmed economic growth. Since its inception, Obamacare has imposed numerous taxes on the American people including a tax for failing to purchase government approved health insurance, a tax on innovative medicines, multiple taxes on Health Savings Accounts and Flexible Spending Accounts, and even a tax on families with high medical bills.

All of these taxes impact the middle class - either directly hitting families' paychecks or by increasing the cost of healthcare goods and services. On the other hand, repealing these taxes will reduce the federal government's control over healthcare and return power to caregivers and patients.

While all Obamacare taxes should be repealed, lawmakers must also act quickly to ensure that they do not allow a tax hike to go into effect under their watch. If they fail to act, the medical device tax and health insurance tax will become law on January 1, 2018, resulting in higher premiums and higher costs for middle class families, seniors, and small businesses.

The Obamacare health insurance tax hits 11 million households that purchase through the individual insurance market and 23 million households covered through their jobs. Half of this tax is paid by those earning less than $50,000 a year and it is responsible for increasing premiums by an average of $5,000 per family over a decade according to research by the American Action Forum.

The health insurance tax also hits 1.7 million small businesses, costing an estimated 286,000 small business jobs and $33 billion in lost sales.

The $30 billion medical device tax is similarly harmful to businesses. It could cost as many as 25,000 lost jobs by 2021 if it is not delayed, and because it is levied as an excise tax on medical devices, the costs of this tax are almost entirely passed onto consumers in the form of higher products, as noted by the Congressional Research Service.

Obamacare's taxes have already driven costs up, reduced choice, and needlessly punished American families with higher taxes. The last thing that taxpayers need or deserve is even more damaging Obamacare taxes to go into effect.

Instead, Congress should work on healthcare reform that is focused on lower costs that includes repeal of Obamacare taxes -- first by ensuring that the health insurance tax and medical device tax do not go into effect -- and then working to repeal all trillion dollars of the law's taxes. 

Photo Credit:

Over 65 Groups Against Obama FCC Internet Regulations

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Americans for Tax Reform on Monday, July 17th, 2017, 12:32 PM PERMALINK

Today, more than 65 organizations and individuals concerned about government overreach joined a coalition urging the FCC to turn away from stifling Title II regulation and return to a light touch regulatory framework for governing the Internet. 

Think tanks, advocacy organizations, and individuals from across the country joined together in opposition to these rules, including: Americans for Tax Reform, Americans for Prosperity, FreedomWorks, Governor Paul LePage, ALEC, TechFreedom, Alabama Policy Institute, The Buckeye Institute, Citizen Outreach, Florida Center Right Coalition, Freedom Foundation of Minnesota, Granite State Taxpayers, The Heartland Institute, Independence Institute, Maine Center Right Coalition, Maryland Taxpayers Association, Montanans for Tax Reform, Montana Policy Institute, New Hampshire Center Right Coalition, Public Interest Institute, Rhode Island Center for Freedom & Prosperity, and Rio Grande Foundation.

The coalition wrote:

Imposing Title II regulations on Internet Service Providers (ISPs) means the Internet experience will no longer be shaped by consumers — but instead by government.  Rather than being able to respond to what American households want and need in terms of content, advances in technology, information access, and delivery methods, the Internet experience would be determined by regulators who would have control over rates, types of services, and service footprints. Title II also opens the door to new meddling by state and local governments. Congress created the “information service” classification in Title I precisely to avoid this outcome.”

Innovation and investment require that government’s role be clear, consistent and limited. The “general conduct standard” invented by the Title II order is hopelessly vague. When asked what this standard meant, Former FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler simply said: “we don't really know." This is really no standard at all, because it leaves the regulator with unchecked discretion. No business can plan its investments under such uncertainty or threat of arbitrary enforcement.

Low barriers to entry increase competition and thereby promote reliable Internet access. Far from “clamping down on big guys,” looming legal uncertainty about how the FCC will regulate the Internet hurts small Internet providers most — those that connect people in unserved and underserved areas. The coming next few years will see the deployment of 5G wireless technology, which avoids the huge expenses of wiring the “last mile.” This could fundamentally change the competitive dynamics of the broadband market, erasing the line between wireless and wireline services, and driving an unprecedented level of competition, at least in most markets. Discouraging such new entry would only harm consumers. 

We urge the FCC to return to the demonstrated success of the light touch regulatory model. The Internet thrived nearly twenty years under a “Hands off the Net!” bipartisan consensus against Internet regulation.  We urge the FCC to return to that approach. Ultimately, it is Congress alone that should decide how to update communications law.”

Click here to see the full list of signatories and text of the coalition comments submitted to the FCC.

Photo Credit: SEO

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Stop the IRS from Reading Your Emails

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Americans for Tax Reform on Thursday, July 13th, 2017, 10:40 AM PERMALINK

Statement of Support for Congressman Yoder's Amendment to the Financial Services Appropriations Legislation:

Congressman Yoder's Amendment to the Financial Services Appropriations Legislation will prevent the IRS, CFPB and SEC from using funds to attempt to read Americans emails and other digital content without a warrant. Until the Electronic Communications Privacy Act is updated by passage of the Email Privacy Act, the ECPA has a loop hole that some government agencies claim allow them to dig into a person's private documents without a warrant. This is not what was intended by the Fourth Amendment.  Americans for Tax Reform & Digital Liberty support the inclusion and passage of Congressman Yoder's Amendment.

Photo Credit: G4II4is

Photo Credit:

Three Illinois House Members Break Taxpayer Protection Pledge With Vote In Favor 32% Income Tax Hike

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Americans for Tax Reform on Wednesday, July 5th, 2017, 5:53 PM PERMALINK

Shortly after Gov. Bruce Rauner vetoed a budget that imposes large, permanent increases in the state’s personal and corporate income tax rates, the state senate held a July 4th vote in which they overrode Gov. Rauner’ veto. The House is set to follow suit on Thursday. If the House votes to override, as is expected, the state’s personal income tax will increase by a whopping 32%, taking the rate from 3.75 percent to 4.95 percent. Illinois’ corporate tax rate would rise from 5.25 percent to 7 percent, a 33% increase.

Among the 15 Republicans who voted in favor of this massive tax hike when it originally passed out of the House, three are Taxpayer Protection Pledge signers. One Democratic lawmaker also broke their Taxpayer Protection Pledge by voting for this income tax hike. The House members who broke their commitment to oppose any and all efforts to raise taxes include: Rep. John Cavaletto (R-107), Rep. Robert Pritchard (R-70), and Rep. Reggie Phillips (R-110), (Rep. Linda Chapa LaVia (D-83). 

Gov. Rauner describe the permanent income tax hike as “a two-by-four across the forehead.” Enactment of this budget is a terrible deal for Illinois taxpayers. In addition to imposing large tax increases that will drain resources from the private sector, this budget contains none of structural reforms Illinois desperately needs to put state spending in line with revenues, fix its pension crisis, and become more attractive to new residents, employers, and investors.

Illinois is already losing more residents than any other state. This huge income tax hike will only further the exodus of individuals, families, and employers from the Land of Lincoln.

(Update: a planned Thursday session in which the Illinois House is planning to override Gov. Rauner's veto has been delayed after a woman threw an unidentified powdery substance into the Governor's office. The Illinois capitol has been locked down, with legislators and staff ordered to shelter themselves until the matter is resolved). 

Photo Credit: pioneer98,

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Roy Cooper Uses Same Obstructionist Playbook As Washington Democrats, But Taxpayers Win With Veto Override

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Americans for Tax Reform on Friday, June 30th, 2017, 12:57 PM PERMALINK

Some positive news came out of North Carolina this week for taxpayers in the state, where Republicans who control the state legislature enacted a new two year budget that will allow their constituents to keep more of their hard-earned income. North Carolina’s new budget, enacted with a bipartisan super-majority vote overriding Gov. Roy Cooper’s (D) veto, makes the following changes to the state’s tax code, which will take effect January 1, 2019:

  • Cuts the state’s flat personal income tax rate from 5.499% to 5.25%
  •  Reduces the corporate tax rate from 3% to 2.5%
  •  Increases the standard deduction for married couples filing jointly from  $17,500 to $20,000
  •  Cuts the franchise tax rate for S-Corporations

Gov. Roy Cooper, in explaining the justification for his veto, portrayed the budget approved by both chambers of the North Carolina General Assembly as a giveaway to the wealthy. Unfortunately for Cooper, the facts show the opposite about the new budget.

The new budget approved over Cooper’s objections provides tax relief for 99% of North Carolinians. In fact, the burden of total income tax liability is transferred more from middle and low income earners to high income earners. After the reduced income tax rates go into effect in 2019, households earning less than $100,000 annually will contribute a lower percentage of total income tax collections, while those making more than $100,000 will contribute a greater share.

Another smart reform included in the new budget is the creation of the “Personal Education Savings Account” program for students with disabilities. Education Savings Accounts (ESAs) allow parents of students with special needs to customize their child’s education to best fit their needs. Each account will receive $9,000, which can be used for school tuition, books, and other education expenses. North Carolina joins Arizona, Nevada, Mississippi, Florida, and Tennessee as the handful of states with active ESA programs.

Republicans in North Carolina inherited a $2.7 billion deficit, along with the highest personal and corporate income tax rates in the region when they took over the General Assembly six years ago. Since then, Senate President Phil Berger, Speaker Tim Moore, and their colleagues have worked hard to put the state on sound financial footing, while implementing pro-growth tax reform that has made the state more attractive to job creators and investors. In addition to the pro-growth tax changes enacted in recent years, beginning with the landmark 2013 tax reform act, North Carolina lawmakers have kept growth in spending in check, and built up the largest rainy day fund in state history. In every year since Republicans took control of the state legislature, spending growth has been held below the combined rate of population growth and inflation.

“It’s unfortunate that Gov. Roy Cooper has decided to use the same obstructionist playbook as Nancy Pelosi and Washington Democrats. Fortunately for North Carolina taxpayers, Republican legislators are using the veto-proof majorities awarded to them by voters to provide further relief to North Carolina taxpayers,” said Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform. “Individuals, families, and employers across North Carolina have been allowed to keep billions of dollars more of their hard-earned income thanks to the multiple rounds of tax reform enacted by Republican state legislators in recent years. This latest personal and corporate income tax cuts will make the state even more conducive to economic growth and job creation.”

Photo Credit: Jimmy Emerson,

ATR and Digital Liberty Support Brendan Carr for FCC Commissioner

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Americans for Tax Reform on Thursday, June 29th, 2017, 3:05 PM PERMALINK

Yesterday, President Donald J. Trump signaled his intent to nominate Brendan Carr as Commissioner to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for the remaining term ending in June 13, 2018 and an additional term of 5 years expiring June 13, 2023. Carr has served at the Commission for five years and currently serves as the General Counsel of the FCC where he is the chief legal advisor to the FCC.

The following can be attributed to Grover Norquist, President of Americans for Tax Reform:

“I congratulate Brendan Carr for his upcoming nomination to the FCC. Throughout his past five years at the Commission, Carr has created a distinguished record as top advisor to then Commissioner Ajit Pai and as the General Counsel to the Commission. Carr will be a strong asset to the Commission. I applaud the president’s choice for FCC Commissioner and I urge the Senate to confirm his nomination.”

The following can be attributed to Katie McAuliffe, Executive Director of Digital Liberty:

“Brendan Carr has a distinguished record at the commission throughout his past five years of service in his various roles including his position as the Commission’s General Counsel.  I congratulate him on his coming nomination.

“His knowledge of wireless policy and public safety will aid the Commission in making key decisions within the FCC’s broad jurisdiction. Carr’s elevation to Commissioner ensures that there are 5 in-the-weeds experts directing the FCC’s activity, eliminating the learning curve and demonstrating the Presidents understanding of how important the telecommunications industry is to our country’s economic future. I applaud the President’s intent to nominate Carr to serve as an FCC Commissioner and I urge all Senators to confirm his nomination.”

Traditionally, Presidents nominate at least one Commissioner from the other party and are voted on and confirmed in the Senate together. Since no party can have more than a one vote majority, President Trump also recently nominated Jessica Rosenworcel who served as the Democratic commissioner until 2016. If confirmed, FCC leadership would have five members, filling all remaining commissioner seats at the FCC.   

Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore

Photo Credit:

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Tax Reform Brings out the Good and Bad in Key States

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Americans for Tax Reform on Thursday, June 22nd, 2017, 10:47 AM PERMALINK

With 50 laboratories of democracy in the U.S., some state legislatures provide examples of smart pro-growth policies that other states would be wise to emulate, while others serve as bad examples by enacting policies that other states should avoid.

Taxachusetts Lawmakers Help The Commonwealth Earns Its Nickname

The past week has underscored this dynamic, in particular when it comes to income tax reform. In Massachusetts, state lawmakers referred a measure to the 2018 ballot that, if enacted, would move the state from having a flat income tax, to a progressive structure with income over $1,000,000 subject to a 4% surtax on top of the commonwealth’s existing 5.10% flat income tax rate. Meanwhile, in North Carolina, Republicans who run the state senate and assembly announced a budget deal that will reduce personal and corporate income tax rates.

Maryland, which enacted a similar millionaires’ tax when Gov. Martin O’Malley was governor, provides a cautionary tale highlighting why Massachusetts voters should reject the surtax that will appear on their 2018 statewide ballot. A year after Maryland’s millionaire’s tax took effect, one-third of the state’s millionaires fled the state. A 2011 study, of migration patterns across the 50 states concluded that millionaires tend to leave states with high income tax rates for states with relatively lower income taxes. Enactment of a millionaires’ tax would be bad news for Massachusetts, but great news for neighboring New Hampshire, one the nine states that does not levy and income tax*.

19,600 Massachusetts tax filers would be affected by the tax increase, 900 of whom are projected to make $10 million annually and would contribute 53 percent of the revenues from the new tax. If just one-third of these 900 tax-filers left, the tax revenue lost would be about $750 million. It is not just the wealthy who would be hit by this tax hike. According to IRS data, over 10,000 Massachusetts small businesses would also be hit by this tax hike, since the majority of small businesses file under the individual income tax system.

The Beacon Hill Institute found that the surtax could cost the state more than 9,000 private sector jobs and $405 million in disposable income. While income tax hikes on the wealthy are often popular with voters, the fact is that the millionaires’ tax will hit small businesses with a 78% income tax rate hike, greatly reducing their job-creating capacity.  

In addition to making the Bay State less attractive to investment and job creators, Increased reliance on upper-income households will make Massachusetts’ revenues less stable, and budgeting more difficult. This is because increasing the progressivity of the tax code leads to greater volatility in revenue collections. One of the worst parts of this proposal is that, if it’s enacted by voters in 2018, there will be no way to amend it until the year 2023. So, if the tax ends up damaging the economy and chasing individuals, families, and employers out of state, like such tax hikes have in other states, lawmakers and voters will have to wait half a decade before they are able to rectify the problem.  

Tax Reform Train Rolls on in the Tar Heel State

Days after Massachusetts lawmakers voted to advance a massive income tax hike, North Carolina legislators announced a budget agreement that will take the Tar Heel State in the other direction by enacting another round of cuts to the personal and corporate income tax rates. Though the house and the senate rolled out similar plans with a $22.9 billion budget, there are some key differences between the proposals and how the budget is spent.

The budget deal announced by legislative leaders makes the following tax changes, which would take effect January 1, 2019:

  • Cuts the state’s flat personal income tax rate from 5.499% to 5.25%
  • Reduces the corporate tax rate from 3% to 2.5%
  • Increased the standard deduction for married couples filing jointly from $17,500 to $20,000

The budget with these reforms will pass both chambers of the legislature this week. Though the budget includes many of Gov. Roy Cooper’s (D) priorities, it is unlikely he will sign this budget into law. Fortunately for North Carolina taxpayers, Republicans hold veto-proof majorities in both chambers of the legislature, and can enact this budget over Gov. Cooper’s objection.

In a year where 31 states are facing revenue shortfalls, North Carolina has a half a billion dollar surplus. In fact, this marks the third straight year that the state has realized a budget surplus.

These surpluses have occurred at the same time North Carolina lawmakers have approved multiple rounds of personal and corporate income tax rate cuts. In addition to the pro-growth tax changes enacted, the key to North Carolina’s fiscal and economic success has been spending restraint. Every year since Republicans took control of the state legislature, spending growth has been held before the rate of population growth and inflation. When it comes to models for pro-growth tax reform and spending restraint, other states and federal officials should look to the Tar Heel State for inspiration, and Massachusetts as an example of what not to do.    

Photo Credit: Murduck Rubbaduckie

More from Americans for Tax Reform

ATR Statement in Support of the No Regulation Without Representation Act

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Americans for Tax Reform on Tuesday, June 13th, 2017, 4:57 PM PERMALINK

ATR and Digital Liberty Support Congressman Sensenbrenner’s No Regulation without Representation Act

Today, Congressman Sensenbrenner (R- Wisc.) introduced H.R. 2887, the No Regulation Without Representation Act, to address state regulations that tax businesses physically outside the borders of the state.

 In Quill v. North Dakota, the Supreme Court found that states are sovereign only within their own borders and that the Constitution prohibits state regulations from crossing state borders. Despite the Supreme Court’s decision, states have regulated businesses outside the parameters of the state for decades. Sensenbrenner’s bill would codify this requirement in relieving small businesses from the heavy weight of government overreach and overregulation.

The following can be attributed to Grover Norquist, President of Americans for Tax Reform:

"The No Regulation Without Representation Act reigns in government overreach by forbidding any state from 1) imposing a sales tax on businesses physically outside the boundaries of the state, and 2) prohibits any state from exporting regulations onto businesses in other states.

"Regulations can be as abusive as taxes. If the American Revolution was revisited today the slogan would certainly be 'No Taxation and No Regulations without Representation.'

 "I commend Congressman Sensenbrenner for introducing the No Regulation without Representation Act and I urge all members of Congress to support this important piece of legislation. "  

The following can be attributed to Katie McAuliffe, Executive Director of Digital Liberty:

"Over the past few years, state legislatures have crossed their bounds by regulating and taxing businesses physically outside the parameters of their own state.

"Regulations that constrict and tax businesses outside of state borders challenge state sovereignty and federalism while making it incredibly difficult for small businesses to flourish under the backbreaking weight of regulations. I commend Congressman Sensenbrenner for addressing this by introducing the No Regulation without Representation Act."

The full text of the bill can be found here

Photo Credit: BKL

Photo Credit:

More from Americans for Tax Reform

ATR Releases List of 2017 New Jersey State Pledge Signers

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Americans for Tax Reform on Monday, June 5th, 2017, 5:36 PM PERMALINK

Americans for Tax Reform recognizes the New Jersey incumbents and candidates who have taken the Taxpayer Protection Pledge ahead of tomorrow’s state primary election. The Pledge is a written commitment to hardworking Garden State taxpayers and to the American people to “oppose and vote against any and all efforts to increase taxes.”

“By signing The Pledge, New Jersey candidates and incumbents demonstrate that they will safeguard taxpayers from higher taxes,” said Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform. “Pledge signers understand that government should be reformed in a way that it spends and takes less taxpayer dollars, and will oppose tax increases that prolong failures of the past.”

The following candidates and incumbents have signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge:


  • Louis Greenwald (Assembly -6)
  • Holly Schepisi (Assembly -39)
  • Amy Handlin (Assembly -13)
  • Robert Clifton (Assembly -12)
  • Jon Bramnick (Assembly -21)
  • Michael Carroll (Assembly -25)
  • Sean Kean (Assembly -30)
  • Declan O'Scanlon (Assembly -13)
  • David Rible (Assembly -30)
  • Jay Webber (Assembly -26)
  • Anthony M.Bucco (Assembly -25)
  • Michael Patrick Carroll (Assembly -25)
  • Anthony Bucco (Senate- 25)
  • Diane Allen (Senate- 7)
  • Gerald Cardinale (Senate-39)
  • Michael Doherty (Senate-23)
  • Tom Kean Jr. (Senate- 21)
  • Shirley Turner (Senate- 15)
  • James Holzapfel (Senate-10)
  • Christopher Connors (Senate-9)
  • Joe Pennacchio (Senate- 26)
  • Dawn Addiego (Senate- 8)
  • Kevin Otoole (Senate- 40B)
  • Samuel D. Thompson (Senate- 12)



  • William "Hank" Lyon (Assembly - 26)


Open Seat Candidates: 

  • Nathan Orr (Assembly - 24)
  • Teresa Gordon (Assembly - 5)
  • Lewis Glowgower (Assembly - 18)
  • Rimma Yakobovich (Assembly - 15)
  • Robert Acerra (Assembly - 11)
  • Michael Alonso (Assembly - 31)
  • Lauren DiGiaro (Assembly - 31)
  • Bruce MacDonald (Senate- 14)

Photo Credit:

More from Americans for Tax Reform