ATR Leads Coalition Opposing Wasteful Expansion of FCC Program

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted on Tuesday, February 23rd, 2021, 4:22 PM PERMALINK

WASHINGTON – Today Americans for Tax Reform submitted a letter with along with over 20 other organizations to the Federal Communications Commission in opposition to their desire to expand the E-Rate program.  

The E-Rate program was created by Congress to ensure that classrooms and libraries had affordable access to the internet, but the FCC wants to balloon the program to provide direct services and devices to students.  

Ensuring that students can continue to learn during the pandemic is an important mission, that is why Congress has already appropriated almost $70 billion in COVID stimulus for this purpose; and much of this funding hasn’t even been spent yet.  

The E-Rate program is funded by a regressive fee structure that can exhaust billions of dollars in just a few months. Expanding the mission of the program to millions more individuals would only accelerate the depletion of its funds – hurting those who rely on the program. 

Expanding the E-Rate program to provide direct-services and devices to students would be duplicative, wasteful and inefficient.  

You can read the letter below or click HERE for a downloadable version. 

February 23, 2021

VIA ECFS
 
Ms. Marlene H. Dortch
Secretary
Federal Communications Commission
45 L Street NW
Washington, D.C. 20002
 

RE: Addressing the Homework Gap through the E-Rate Program, WC Docket 21-31

Dear Secretary Dortch:

We the undersigned organizations submit these comments pursuant to the Federal Communications Commission’s rules (47 C.F.R. §§ 1.415 & 1.419) in response to the above-referenced proceeding that the FCC announced in its Public Notice DA 21-98 (“Notice”) of February 1, 2021.

In its Notice, the FCC focuses on specific areas of inquiry, including on page 6 where it asks for comments addressing “Funding and Prioritization,” stating that “substantially more funding might be needed than is potentially available to support remote learning through the E-Rate program." Our comments seek to illustrate how:

  1. Additional funding for the E-Rate program is currently unnecessary because of the availability of more than $60 billion in public funding still unspent from other congressionally created programs. The FCC should assist in these disbursements before considering E-Rate expansion.
  2. Ongoing and well-documented inefficiencies in the Universal Service Fund make the E–Rate program an inappropriate vehicle to deliver effective relief to students while maintaining the solvency of the fund. The FCC should work with Congress on contribution and distribution reforms, if the USF is to continue.

 

The CARES Act (Pub.L. 116–136) established the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER) Fund as well as the Governor’s Emergency Education Relief (GEER) Fund, providing for an initial funding of $12.8 billion and $3 billion respectively. Of the $12.8 billion appropriated for the ESSER fund, only $3 billion has been spent. Congress appropriated an additional $54 billion for the ESSER fund and an additional $4 billion for the GEER fund in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 (Pub.L. 116–260). This makes a total of $68 billion currently available to support remote learning for students, including helping schools equip students with broadband connectivity, laptops, and tablets. Before moving to expand the E-Rate program, which is not statutorily able to support at-home devices and connectivity, the FCC should assist states and the Department of Education in disbursing these funds more effectively to better help students hit hardest by the pandemic.  

The USF program provides funding to provide communications to areas of the country that are hard to reach (high-cost); rural health care; schools and libraries (E-Rate); and low-income support (Lifeline and Linkup). The companies paying into USF funding include wireline phone companies, wireless phone companies, paging service companies, and certain Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) providers. These fees or contributions are typically passed on to the consumer in the form of a USF fee. As many of these pools of contributors shrink, mobile customers increasingly take the brunt of these fees.

The contribution factor for USF has been on an upward trajectory for the last decade where it increased from 20% to 31.8% in just the last two years, putting exceedingly regressive fee percentages on individuals’ voice service. At the current contribution rate, if everyone eligible for Lifeline services signed up for the program, billions of dollars in funding could be exhausted in only just a few months. Simply expanding the E-Rate program, which also draws on USF, under current conditions is unsustainable.

Both the E-Rate and Lifeline program distribution processes should be examined for reforms. It is likely that distributions at the customer level will be more efficiently disbursed and utilized than distribution at the carrier level. Expansion of the E-Rate program before reassessing the contribution factor and distribution mechanisms will endanger all of the four programs that are part of USF including rural healthcare and the high-cost programs. The FCC should continue to work with Congress to use existing funds to support home-based connectivity during the COVID-19 pandemic. And, if USF programs are to continue, the FCC should work with legislators to develop the most cost-effective contribution and distribution reforms that reduce the strain on consumers and taxpayers before expanding any programs within the USF to protect its solvency.

The COVID-19 pandemic has created extraordinary challenges that require extraordinary efforts to solve. While the government works to ensure that students remain connected with their education, the FCC should continue its policy to support the work of the Department of Education and states instead of endangering the sustainability of the Universal Service Fund and all of the programs that it supports.

Sincerely,

Grover G. Norquist
President
Americans for Tax Reform
 
Roslyn Layton, PhD
Visiting Fellow
Aalborg University
 
Phil Kerpen
President
American Commitment
 
Krisztina Pusok, Ph. D.
Director of Policy and Research
American Consumer Institute
Center for Citizen Research
 
Jeffrey Mazzella
President
Center for Individual Freedom
 
Thomas Schatz
President
Citizens Against Government Waste
 
Jessica Melugin
Director, Center for Technology and Innovation
The Competitive Enterprise Institute
 
Katie McAuliffe
Executive Director
Digital Liberty
 
Sarah Anderson
Director of Policy
FreedomWorks
 
Mario H. Lopez
President
Hispanic Leadership Fund
 
Carrie Lukas
President
Independent Women's Forum
 
Heather R. Higgins
CEO
Independent Women's Voice
 
Tom Giovanetti
President
Institute for Policy Innovation
 
Andrea O'Sullivan
Director, Center for Technology and Innovation
The James Madison Institute
 
Seton Motley
President
Less Government
 
Brandon Arnold
Executive Vice President
National Taxpayers Union
 
Tom Hebert
Executive Director
Open Competition Center
 
Karen Kerrigan
President & CEO
Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council
 
James L. Martin
Founder/Chairman
60 Plus Association
 
Saulius “Saul” Anuzis
President
60 Plus Association
 
David Williams
President
Taxpayer Protection Alliance
 
James E. Dunstan
General Counsel
TechFreedom

 

Photo Credit: New America

More from Americans for Tax Reform

×