INDEX
- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
- Washington Welcomes Cost of Government Day (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
- Government Workers' Pensions are Underfunded by $3 Trillion
Monday, August 23, 2010
- Fourteen Ways to Reduce Government Spending
- FCC Report on Broadband Performance: A Scare Tactic
- Sen. Al Franken Doesn’t Understand Wireless Networks...or the First Amendment
Friday, August 20, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 19, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
The War On Free Speech
From Tim Andrews on Friday, October 23, 2009 3:52 PM
It should go without saying that freedom of speech is an essential part of any democratic state. The freedom to criticize the government, to say what you think and feel, and to truly engage in the political process.
It is for this reason that I am somewhat disturbed by a recent trend that seems to be developing in some of the more recent actions of this Administration.
Earlier this year, there was a considerable push to reinstitute the “Fairness Doctrine”. This is a doctrine which effectively muzzles conservative talk-radio hosts, and prevents them from exercising their freedom of speech. As we have stated previously, this ironically named doctrine presents a grave threat to political thought and the freedom of ideas that distinguish America as the freest society in the world.
Then earlier this month, the Federal Trade Commission issued an 81 page document which significantly regulates the actions of bloggers, and also promoted a workshop discussing the creation of government-operated newspapers.
Of course, this is all in the context of President Obama’s radical plan regulate the internet, which, if passed, shall have incredibly serious deleterious consequences not just in terms of reducing bandwidth speed and increasing costs to consumers, but also as a potential introduction to even greater government regulation and ultimately censorship (the current bans on online poker are just the first step)
It is onto this backdrop that the Administration’s recent attacks on Fox News are especially worrying.
There can be little doubt that Fox News has been responsible for some of most in-depth investigations of the Obama Administration to date. While the Mainstream Media missed the three biggest stories of the year, Fox News has reported the facts and asked the difficult questions. In response, after Fox reported how the interim communications director for the White House praised genocidal murderer Chairman Mao (responsible for 40-80million deaths – more than any other man in history) as one of her greatest inspirations and favorite philosophers, the White House has responded with a blatant attack on Fox News, firstly saying that Fox was not a news outlet, calling upon all other media outlets to effectively boycott Fox, and to ignore any story that originates with them. Just think – the Executive Branch is now telling the media exactly what they should be doing. The implications are staggering.
This heated up yesterday, when the White House announced today that White House Press Pool access to Czar Feinberg would explicitly exclude Fox News, despite the fact that the Press Pool is part-funded by Fox. Fortunately, the other networks refused to comply with this, and the Administration was forced to reverse course.
It is not so much this one incident that is troubling – rather, it is the underlying theme of all of these events put together, one where undoubtedly free speech is slowly being ebbed away.
As one commentator noted: “When you look at this administration’s performance to date, it’s like the Democratic Party went out and found themselves a caricature of everything that they complained about/hated/feared with regard to George W Bush… only this time? It’s all true.”
(H/T: RedState)
Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: FREESPEECH, TELECOM, Federal














Comments
It'd be interesting to see all the accusations from the left from 01-09 that certain media outlets were being barred from the White House. Funny how certain people's fears can become a reality.
>> Socrates Johnson Friday, October 23, 2009 4:22 PM Report Comment
It is at least encouraging that the other news organizations are realizing that if Obama can start bullying one organization, he can bully the others as well. If they don't stay strong and protect free speech and a free press we will end up with a news media like Venezuela. It is time for the rest of us to take that example, we can disagree on issues, but we better band together as Americans against a tyrannical government before it is too late. If the government can deny the rights of one group of people, they deny them for ALL people.
>> TCH Friday, October 23, 2009 5:21 PM Report Comment
I'll wait 'til I see this story on the evening news before I congratulate the media for, at long last, DOING THEIR JOB. Guess what? I won't.
>> Dave Watson Friday, October 23, 2009 5:35 PM Report Comment
You need to get Planters to sponsor your site cause its full of nuts.
>> Bill Friday, October 23, 2009 6:21 PM Report Comment
Guaranteed free speech does not necessitate a "right" to be heard: one may criticize the government, but the government isn't required to cater to fallacious or fatuous criticism; the government is blacklisting vapid belligerence, and rightly so.
>> Somniferous Friday, October 23, 2009 6:30 PM Report Comment
Hey Bill, I hope one day someone tries to upend your right to free speech... maybe then you'll understand that it's not "nutty" to believe in your constitutional rights.
>> Jake Saturday, October 24, 2009 1:14 PM Report Comment