- Obama Proposes Over $220 Billion in New Energy Taxes
- Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy Releases Local Transparency Study for VA (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
- New Transparency Resource for Connecticut Taxpayers (CFA Site »)
- Colorado Senate Debates "Dirty Dozen" Tax Package
- About Those Jobs Numbers (CFA Site »)
- More Job Creation By The Federal Government
Monday, February 8, 2010
- Van Taylor, candidate for Texas State House, Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- February 6, 2010: Ronald Reagan Day
Saturday, February 6, 2010
- The Obama Budget
- Obama Feels International Pressure to Pass FTAs
- Let's Expedite Debate on Spending Reductions! (CFA Site »)
- Bipartisan Reform Commissions - a Comparison (CFA Site »)
- Obama Should Cooperate with Boehner and Cantor to Force Debate on Spending Reductions
- Not All Bipartisan Reform Commissions Are Created Equal
- Populist Politicians Use Poultry to Pontificate and Pander (ASA Site »)
- The Hidden Tax Hikes in the Obama Budget
Friday, February 5, 2010
- PACT Act May Reduce Tax Hike Pressures
- Arizona Congressional Candidate Eric Wnuck Signs the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- David Schweikert Signs the Taxpayer Protection Pledge for Congressional Race
- ATR and CFA Will Rate House Vote Against Debt Ceiling Hike and PAYGO
- Why Everyone Should be Worried About Craig Becker (and why Scott Brown needs to stop him)
Thursday, February 4, 2010
- New UAW Union-Foxwoods Contract Will Cost Connecticut Casinos Millions (AWF Site »)
- Guess Where Politicians From Socialised Medicine Countries Go For Healthcare...
- De-Facto Card Check Vote Coming Soon
- De-Facto Card Check Vote Coming Soon (AWF Site »)
- Grover Norquist Urges Senators to CoSponsor Non-Government Spending Jobs Bill
- Jim Ward Signs the Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Arizona Congressional Race
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
- Good Evening Arizona Pledge Breakers
- The Obama Budget and Small Business
- Administration Pushes Ahead With Internet Takeover
- SEIU Response to Lobbying Investigation Tongue-Tied (AWF Site »)
- Brewer Sales Tax Hike Passed out of Senate Committee
- A Senate Vote for Craig Becker, NLRB Nom, is a Vote For Card Check (AWF Site »)
- Sound Tax Competition Policy From Switzerland
- U.S. Attorney Reviews AWF's Call for Probe of SEIU Activities with White House, Congress (AWF Site »)
- Colorado House Disregards U.S. and State Constitutions; Passes eTaxes (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- The President's Budget: No Fiscal Restraint in Sight
- Vulnerable Colorado Democrats Vote for Higher Taxes
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
- Colorado House Signs Off On Tax Package
- Do You Know Where Your Tax Dollars Go?
- US Attorney Reviews Call for Probe into SEIU President Andy Stern’s Lobbying Activities
- Property Rights is a Global Affair (PRA Site »)
- What does the "budget freeze" actually mean?
- Utah Legislators Paving the Way for Higher Taxes
- The Budget & International Tax Competition
- Initial Thoughts on the New Obama Budget
- Another Look At Employment Data
- Obama Labor Board Nominee, "workers should not be able to choose against having a union"
- State Level Taxpayer Protection Pledge Signers in Illinois
- Presidential Math: Failed Policies + More Failed Policies = More Jobs
Monday, February 1, 2010
- The Effects of the Mere Possibility of a Bank Tax on Your 401(k) (ASA Site »)
- Very well, so there is a 'job boom'
- Survey Says: Legal Downloading Not So Bad (PRA Site »)
- Post "Stimulus" Unemployment: A Historical Perspective
- Virginia Senator Janet D. Howell Doesn't Get It
- Trains, Pains, and a Whole Lot of Subsidies
- Do You Know Which Candidates in Illinois Have Signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge?
- State of the Union Myth/Fact: Obama's Taxes on Energy & Families
- Real Stimulus Georgians Can Believe In
- Stimulus II: A Sequel America Cannot Afford (ASA Site »)
- SOTU: The President's Misguided Take on Spending
Friday, January 29, 2010
- Colorado House Finance Committee Passes Cadre of Tax Hikes
-
State of the Union Myth/Fact:
Government-Run Healthcare - Colorado Legislature Kicks Off 2010 with an eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Beth Coulson Signs the Taxpayer Protection Pledge in 2010 Illinois House Race
-
State of the Union Myth/Fact:
Obama's New Taxes on Your 401(k) - Colorado Legislature Kicks Off 2010 with an eTax
-
GOP SC Gubernatorial Hopefuls Debate in Charleston Tonight,
ATR asks all to Sign Pledge
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Treasury Secretary Geithner on Small Business Tax Hikes
From Ryan Ellis on Thursday, March 12, 2009 3:34 PMTreasury Secretary Tim Geithner testified today before the Senate Budget Committee. Most of the proceedings focused on the Obama tax hike. Of particular interest was the hemming and hawing Geithner did on the impact that the Obama tax hike will have on small businesses.
Here's what Geithner had to say in his prepared testimony:
The President’s Budget includes tax provisions to help small businesses. It recognizes that many small businesses are operated as sole proprietorships or through partnerships and other flowthrough entities, and leaves the individual income tax rates at which these small businesses are taxed unchanged in 2009 and 2010. By extending the current rate structure for families earning less than $250,000 after 2010, it ensures that 97% of small businesses will receive additional tax relief at that time or see their rates remain unchanged.
A few thoughts here:
- It's good that Geither recognizes that small businesses are organized as sole proprietorships, partnerships, and S-corporations. He should further recognize that more than $2 out of every $3 in profit earned by these businesses will be hit by his administration's tax rate hikes
- It's good that Geithner acknowledges that small business owners pay taxes on their business' profits personally. So, raising tax rates on most of this profit can't be a good thing, can it?
- He claims that 97% of small businesses won't be affected by these rate hikes. First of all, that might be a little high (I think the number is closer to 85%), but I won't quibble over the fact that most small businesses won't face higher tax rates. That completely and totally misses the point, though. Two out of three dollars of small business profits will pay these higher tax rates. This tax increase is a tax increase on the small business sector
- As long as we're talking numbers, I have another one for Secretary Geithner. According to the Census Bureau, 35% of American workers--42 million people--are employed in firms with fewer than 100 employees. These firms are no doubt the same ones that will face a tax hike under Obama
To re-emphasize, the top small business tax rate will go from 37.9% to 42.5%. If the Obama Democrat primary campaign tax plan goes through (uncapping the Social Security taxable wage base), this rate will further climb to 54.9%. This would be the highest tax rate on the small business sector since the Carter Administration.
Why does is make sense to focus a tax increase directly on most small business income and the employers of a large percentage of Americans? The answer is that it doesn't.
Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: TAXES, THEPLEDGE, POLITICS, CONGRESS, OBAMA, BUDGET
Related Articles
Obama Proposes Over $220 Billion in New Energy Taxes - Tuesday, February 9, 2010 11:47 AM
Colorado Senate Debates "Dirty Dozen" Tax Package - Monday, February 8, 2010 2:36 PM
Van Taylor, candidate for Texas State House, Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge - Saturday, February 6, 2010 5:35 PM
The Obama Budget - Friday, February 5, 2010 5:42 PM
Obama Feels International Pressure to Pass FTAs - Friday, February 5, 2010 4:01 PM












Comments
see how this affects us
>> john Friday, March 13, 2009 11:34 AM
Why? Because the Almighty needs our money of further his goal of socalism. Oh and bye the bye it also buys votes. Doc
>> Ed Watson Friday, March 13, 2009 2:07 PM
In 2006, 78% of the households in America earned between $19K and $250K. J. Peter Grace in 1984 headed a commission that re-discovered what Willie Sutton taught us in the 1930's... That; the money will be pursued wherever it is. Willie robbed banks; the government taxes the middle class. No other scenario will raise the large amounts of cash desired. The difference between Willie and the government is; Willie, not a bureaucracy didn’t waste as much and, he was honest about what he did.
>> M.A.K. Friday, March 13, 2009 2:48 PM
The administration has been forced to change its tune. The Obama administration is sinking fast. nachumlist.com
>> Nachum Sunday, March 15, 2009 1:54 PM