- Obama Proposes Over $220 Billion in New Energy Taxes
- Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy Releases Local Transparency Study for VA (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
- New Transparency Resource for Connecticut Taxpayers (CFA Site »)
- Colorado Senate Debates "Dirty Dozen" Tax Package
- About Those Jobs Numbers (CFA Site »)
- More Job Creation By The Federal Government
Monday, February 8, 2010
- Van Taylor, candidate for Texas State House, Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- February 6, 2010: Ronald Reagan Day
Saturday, February 6, 2010
- The Obama Budget
- Obama Feels International Pressure to Pass FTAs
- Let's Expedite Debate on Spending Reductions! (CFA Site »)
- Bipartisan Reform Commissions - a Comparison (CFA Site »)
- Obama Should Cooperate with Boehner and Cantor to Force Debate on Spending Reductions
- Not All Bipartisan Reform Commissions Are Created Equal
- Populist Politicians Use Poultry to Pontificate and Pander (ASA Site »)
- The Hidden Tax Hikes in the Obama Budget
Friday, February 5, 2010
- PACT Act May Reduce Tax Hike Pressures
- Arizona Congressional Candidate Eric Wnuck Signs the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- David Schweikert Signs the Taxpayer Protection Pledge for Congressional Race
- ATR and CFA Will Rate House Vote Against Debt Ceiling Hike and PAYGO
- Why Everyone Should be Worried About Craig Becker (and why Scott Brown needs to stop him)
Thursday, February 4, 2010
- New UAW Union-Foxwoods Contract Will Cost Connecticut Casinos Millions (AWF Site »)
- Guess Where Politicians From Socialised Medicine Countries Go For Healthcare...
- De-Facto Card Check Vote Coming Soon
- De-Facto Card Check Vote Coming Soon (AWF Site »)
- Grover Norquist Urges Senators to CoSponsor Non-Government Spending Jobs Bill
- Jim Ward Signs the Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Arizona Congressional Race
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
- Good Evening Arizona Pledge Breakers
- The Obama Budget and Small Business
- Administration Pushes Ahead With Internet Takeover
- SEIU Response to Lobbying Investigation Tongue-Tied (AWF Site »)
- Brewer Sales Tax Hike Passed out of Senate Committee
- A Senate Vote for Craig Becker, NLRB Nom, is a Vote For Card Check (AWF Site »)
- Sound Tax Competition Policy From Switzerland
- U.S. Attorney Reviews AWF's Call for Probe of SEIU Activities with White House, Congress (AWF Site »)
- Colorado House Disregards U.S. and State Constitutions; Passes eTaxes (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- The President's Budget: No Fiscal Restraint in Sight
- Vulnerable Colorado Democrats Vote for Higher Taxes
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
- Colorado House Signs Off On Tax Package
- Do You Know Where Your Tax Dollars Go?
- US Attorney Reviews Call for Probe into SEIU President Andy Stern’s Lobbying Activities
- Property Rights is a Global Affair (PRA Site »)
- What does the "budget freeze" actually mean?
- Utah Legislators Paving the Way for Higher Taxes
- The Budget & International Tax Competition
- Initial Thoughts on the New Obama Budget
- Another Look At Employment Data
- Obama Labor Board Nominee, "workers should not be able to choose against having a union"
- State Level Taxpayer Protection Pledge Signers in Illinois
- Presidential Math: Failed Policies + More Failed Policies = More Jobs
Monday, February 1, 2010
- The Effects of the Mere Possibility of a Bank Tax on Your 401(k) (ASA Site »)
- Very well, so there is a 'job boom'
- Survey Says: Legal Downloading Not So Bad (PRA Site »)
- Post "Stimulus" Unemployment: A Historical Perspective
- Virginia Senator Janet D. Howell Doesn't Get It
- Trains, Pains, and a Whole Lot of Subsidies
- Do You Know Which Candidates in Illinois Have Signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge?
- State of the Union Myth/Fact: Obama's Taxes on Energy & Families
- Real Stimulus Georgians Can Believe In
- Stimulus II: A Sequel America Cannot Afford (ASA Site »)
- SOTU: The President's Misguided Take on Spending
Friday, January 29, 2010
- Colorado House Finance Committee Passes Cadre of Tax Hikes
-
State of the Union Myth/Fact:
Government-Run Healthcare - Colorado Legislature Kicks Off 2010 with an eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Beth Coulson Signs the Taxpayer Protection Pledge in 2010 Illinois House Race
-
State of the Union Myth/Fact:
Obama's New Taxes on Your 401(k) - Colorado Legislature Kicks Off 2010 with an eTax
-
GOP SC Gubernatorial Hopefuls Debate in Charleston Tonight,
ATR asks all to Sign Pledge
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Tax Increases in House Dem Health Bill
Tuesday, July 14, 2009 3:04 PMA draft of the House Democrat health care bill is out, and it's been leaked to ATR staff. There are several major tax increases in here, most of which violate the Taxpayer Protection Pledge. They include:
- a tax on individuals failing to sign up for health care equal to the lesser of 2.5% of adjusted gross income (AGI) or the average individual premium amount
- a tax on employers for not providing a health care plan equal to 8% of payroll. This becomes 0, 4, or 6 percent of payroll as payday totals dip below $400,000 annually
- a new and undetermined excise tax on health insurance plans
- codification of the "economic substance doctrine," whereby businesses would not be able to engage in legal tax avoidance techniques without demonstrating a bona fide business purpose
- delay of worldwide interest allocation, a baby step toward the full double-taxation of corporate profits earned overseas
- the big one--a new "surtax" on the AGI of small businesses and other high income earners. Here's the details:
1% on AGI of $350,000 to $500,000
1.5% on AGI of $500,000 to $1,000,000
5.4% on AGI of over $1,000,000
Those brackets are 50% if you're Married Filing Separately, and 80% if you're Single or Head of Household
This will result in a top rate of 45%, and a capital gains rate of over 25%. It's more than that when you factor in that this surtax is not on taxable income, but on adjusted gross income. Factoring that plus state income tax in means that the top rate will exceed 50%, and the capital gains rate will exceed 30%.
Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: TAXES, HEALTHCARE
Related Articles
Obama Proposes Over $220 Billion in New Energy Taxes - Tuesday, February 9, 2010 11:47 AM
Colorado Senate Debates "Dirty Dozen" Tax Package - Monday, February 8, 2010 2:36 PM
Van Taylor, candidate for Texas State House, Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge - Saturday, February 6, 2010 5:35 PM
The Obama Budget - Friday, February 5, 2010 5:42 PM
Obama Should Cooperate with Boehner and Cantor to Force Debate on Spending Reductions - Friday, February 5, 2010 1:45 PM












Comments
At some point in the very near future the "Tax" straw that will break the Country's back will be too late to avoid (if it isn't alread).
>> Pat Eddu Wednesday, July 15, 2009 4:27 PM
Please go to IBDeditorials.com and read "It's Not an Option" article on coming mandatory public care on p.16! Brought to you by Ovomit, Pelousy, Taxman & Malarkey!
>> sandyinohio Thursday, July 16, 2009 12:37 AM
Based on the obscene spending by Congress, plus the details of this bill, I'd say it's time we the citizens of the United States rebel against this "taxation without representation". Every one of us should let our senators and representatives know that if they support this bill, and others such as cap and trade, they will be voted out of office. There is an electoral reckoning coming in 2010; they ignore our ishes at their peril. JD
>> Jim Dixey Thursday, July 16, 2009 10:12 AM
Most Americans do not realize that they are double taxed on their Social Security income. You and your employer pay a sizable chunk of change into the Social Security tax annually. You are not able to adjust your gross income therefore you pay federal income tax on social security tax.
>> Jeffrey Kelly Thursday, July 16, 2009 10:20 AM
This disgraceful, lying dirtbag in the White House (I can't even bring myself to call him pres) has already gone too far. When will the mainstream media start calling them as they occur & make this weasel accountable? No more free passes.....No more Lies. Go back to community agitating & stop wrecking this great country. I do not care that you have a chip on your shoulder & you feel you have to correct some great injustice. What's next....1 Million dollars to all of Black ancestry? Many people have suffered injustice. They get over it, move on & become productive members of society.
>> Jack McGuinn Thursday, July 16, 2009 11:17 AM
ok look im pretty sure none of us make over350,000 nor do I have investments that come anywhere close to that. Im all for it. 1% of 350,000 dollars cmon thats not much stop being greedy.
>> markus Thursday, July 16, 2009 11:58 AM
It's an interesting mentality that thinks that everyone else (the rich and the large companies) will be the only ones who get taxed. In reality, even the poor will be paying more for all goods and services and they will be paying for their "free" health care" every time they go to town to purchase everything. Businesses will complain, but they'll just hire fewer workers and raise their prices. The result in all areas will be poor service and higher prices. Wouldn't you think Americans would be smarter than this?
>> John Van't Land Thursday, July 16, 2009 12:32 PM
"ok look im pretty sure none of us make over350,000 nor do I have investments that come anywhere close to that. Im all for it. 1% of 350,000 dollars cmon thats not much stop being greedy. >> markus" I don't even make close to that much either but I am smart enough to realize that this is not just 1% so they should stop being greedy. This is an ADDITIONAL tax. Do you not understand that potentially half of what they earn (through their own efforts as this is INCOME not net worth) would be taken from them and given to others in the name of "fairness". How is that "fair"? Only the greedy people that would be receiving that money think it is fair. Stop being so greedy for something that you have not earned.
>> Toby Thursday, July 16, 2009 1:17 PM
You got to love this bill. I know that my nursing home does provide a health care plan that is 8% of payroll so either we increase our cost or pay a penalty. Since 88% of our money comes from MaineCare or Medicare, we are going to need increases in our reimbursement to pay for it...oh but part of the plan calls for billions to be cut from the Medicare program as savings......great plan
>> Peter Thursday, July 16, 2009 1:18 PM
In comment to Markus...I am not currently making over 350,000 dollars a year but will be soon unless obamacare takes away my ability to. Most, not all, of american citizens earning over this amount have worked hard and continue to work hard in order to make their money. I do not agree that they should be required to pay for the people who have elected not to do so. This country was not built on hand-outs and if america was what it use to be people would not be asking for them. We have migrated from a society where people worked to achieve the American Dream to a society that believes just b/c they are an American they deserve to be taken care of.
>> Nic Thursday, July 16, 2009 2:22 PM
Toby you don't get it, sure alot of people don't make that money. But you boss and his company may make that much or more if he is taxed 50 % how long do you think he is going to be able to keep you employed.
>> revoluton Thursday, July 16, 2009 3:32 PM
Screw Obama!!!!
>> Big Poppa Thursday, July 16, 2009 4:47 PM
Judgement Day is coming. These tax and spend liberals are out of control idiots who have not "earned" a dollar in their lives. How in the world would they ever know how to run a business let alone a country. Vote them out!
>> Daniel Thursday, July 16, 2009 4:48 PM
Response to "Marcus" above and anyone else who doesn't see anything wrong with this train wreck: I work for what I earn (and no, it's not $350,000) but I resent having my taxes raised to pay for free education and health care for people who don't work or aren't here legally, although "legal" is sure getting easier and easier! We used to be a Nation whose people took care of themselves and their families. We've become helpless victims who want Fatter Gummit to take care of them. How pathetic!
>> Linda Thursday, July 16, 2009 5:07 PM
Yikes!! Jimmy Carter couldn't hold a candle to this piece of work.
>> Zac Thursday, July 16, 2009 5:30 PM
I have a correction to one of your points. You state, "a tax on individuals failing to sign up for health care equal to the lesser of 2.5% of adjusted gross income (AGI) or the average individual premium amount". The limit is the average family coverage premium amount if the individual has dependents. Later in the document they state that persons are exempt if they "could" be claimed as a dependent for tax purposes. I haven't found it yet but this leaves me thinking that individuals are responsible for the healthcare coverage of anyone that they "could" claim as a dependent for tax purposes.
>> Thersites Thursday, July 16, 2009 5:43 PM
How much more of this can we really take. I work hard- IVe paid my way, I own 2 businesses- I took great risk, worked hard and took out a ton of debt to make this work. If this joker in the 'white' house thinks that Im taking this hit than he is crazy. My staff will be taking a pay cut ( oh thats good for the economy) and if they have a problem with it- there are hundreds of thousands of people that would love thier jobs. this angers me because I have worked hard to keep every ones pay the same through this recession, Ive even added more staff... I pay for my own families coverage. I say to the loosers looking for me to pay for your coverage! Shame on you. You make me sick.
>> mark Thursday, July 16, 2009 9:27 PM