Tax Reform ATR believes that all consumed income should be taxed one time, at one low and flat rate. Link
Jay Old Leaves the Door Open to Tax Hikes http://t.co/A2qdFjUf
taxreformer
CoGC: Nanny State Update: Leaf Blower Bans and Mascot Crackdowns http://t.co/B0XpLd72
taxreformer
ATR Releases 2012 List of State Taxpayer Protection Pledge Signers in the Texas Primary http://t.co/GBXDf6M5
taxreformer
Key Issues Pending in LA with One Week Left in 2012 Session http://t.co/2DDDPdEi
taxreformer
RT @AAF: We are happy to announce our new lighter twitter handle @AAF. Help us spread the word with a RT.
taxreformer
RT @AAN: We are happy to announce our new lighter twitter handle @AAN. Help us spread the word with a RT.
taxreformer
Just the Facts on Big Spending http://t.co/P3pj3ZN0
taxreformer
Jim Pendergraph Supports $2 Trillion Tax Hike http://t.co/LF6ieJuZ
taxreformer
Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley: Barack Obama, Jr. http://t.co/lzrcRtSj
taxreformer
EPA's War on Fossil Fuels http://t.co/gzORlViU
taxreformer
There's a lot of fast and loose numbers thrown around in Washington these days when it comes to health care. It seems like every other day, President Obama and health industry leaders are pulling some "magic asterisk" out of the air, and claiming to have "cut" real health dollars. When you get past the headline, you find it's more fluff than substance.
Until now.
This week, PhRMA announced that they would be cutting name-brand drug prices in half for many seniors. Under Medicare "Part D," seniors face heavily subsidized drug coverage for the first few thousand dollars in annual drug spending, and when they have a very large prescription drug bill. However, there is a coverage gap in between those two subsidies that many have called the "donut hole." In this "donut hole," seniors are left to pick up the tab for their medicines. It's in this coverage gap that PhRMA is cutting drug prices in half.
Notice what you don't see there. You don't see a government bureaucrat "negotiating" with drug companies. You don't see a price control bill passed by Congress. What you do see is an industry doing well by doing good. They know that happy customers are consistent customers, and there is a perceived customer relations issue with this coverage gap. So, like any group of companies, they are making their customers feel better about buying their product.
Now, suppose the government had stormed in and demanded this. At that point, PhRMA would have to protect the interests of member companies and shareholders, and would need an adversarial stance against the federal "negotiators." Seniors would have ended up with a far worse deal.
There's nothing wrong with our healthcare system that can't be solved by the government just getting out of the way.