- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
- Washington Welcomes Cost of Government Day (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
- Government Workers' Pensions are Underfunded by $3 Trillion
Monday, August 23, 2010
- Fourteen Ways to Reduce Government Spending
- FCC Report on Broadband Performance: A Scare Tactic
- Sen. Al Franken Doesn’t Understand Wireless Networks...or the First Amendment
Friday, August 20, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 19, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
If Specter Votes for Health Bill Cloture He Will Violate Taxpayer Protection Pledge
From Ryan Ellis on Sunday, December 20, 2009 5:56 PMIf Sen. Arlen Specter (D-Penn.) votes for cloture on the Manager’s Amendment or for final passage of the Senate healthcare bill, he will violate his Taxpayer Protection Pledge – a written commitment Specter made to Pennsylvanians and the American people.
“Senator Specter promised the people of Pennsylvania that he would vote against any income tax increases,” said Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform. “Senate Democrat bosses have said that Senator Specter has promised to vote for a bill to give the government more control over health care. That bill includes 18 different tax increases.”
When Sen. Specter ran for the U.S. Senate, he made a written Pledge to his constituents to oppose any net income tax hikes. He is bound by that Pledge for the duration of his career as a senator. The Senate healthcare bill contains nearly $500 billion in new tax hikes over the next decade, including billions in income tax hikes.
Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: TAXES, HEALTHCARE, THEPLEDGE, Federal, Pennsylvania














Comments
It seems to me that in the Senate, which used to be a bastion of integrity, the word has lost out to the personal benefits gained for each individual politician. At some time in their life, it will come to their attention that what they are doing is not in the best interest of the country. Then they will have to live with themselves.
>> Edward Mazer Sunday, December 20, 2009 8:42 PM Report Comment
Mr. Mazer, You are correct. Not only will they have to live with themselves, but they will one day be face-to-face with the God to Whom they swore an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of our nation, which is the very document giving them authority to serve in office in the first place. We the People shall have a responsibility as citizens to find them derelict in their duties, and remove them to the ranks of the unemployed.
>> Hobie Sunday, December 20, 2009 11:39 PM Report Comment
Where were you idiots when the Bushies were on their spending spree? I do not recall hearing a sound from that spider hole that you crawled out of..................
>> Mark Tuesday, December 22, 2009 4:57 AM Report Comment
I wish all of the typical liberals who make comments about "Bushies" would kindly remember that at the height of the spending, the Congress was Democrat controlled and "they wrote" the legislation and also approved the spending for the war. Please get your fact pins in order before putting a bowling ball in your mouth. The President cannot veto if the majority rules.
>> Marie Tuesday, December 22, 2009 8:59 AM Report Comment
Mark please allow me also to make a small point as well. When President Bush left office our debt was approximately 480 billion that is with a B your president has improved that greatly using I believe a T for trillon in deficit something like 1.2 trillon as reported and golly gee he and the demorcatic congress did all that in just a single year. Mark please understand my anger I have 6 grand children and I believe they have every right to inherit the same country the same liberties and life style that I have lived and frankly that simply will not be possible as things are going now. This change is not what is in the best interest of the American people or our children and noone has argued that fact sir!
>> Judy Tuesday, December 22, 2009 10:32 AM Report Comment
Of course, I cant't speak for the rest of us idiots, Mark, but in my case, I guess I just assumed that although I realized there was some degree of corruption in our government, I was naive enough to think it wasn't to the degree which would result in the potentially irreparable damage we have been witnessing in the last several months. The result is that more and more of us idiots are becoming less and less "useful" as we educate ourselves about what is necessary to restore the Republic to its founding principles, and begin to seek out and support candidates for public office who will commit to serving on the basis of Principle rather than Politics. You are invited to join us and view our "Reagan List" at: www.AIPNews.com
>> Hobie Tuesday, December 22, 2009 3:00 PM Report Comment
Really? Ben Nelson got almost the entire farm for Nebraska, and the bill won't even get a final vote until Friday morning. Then, he'll get a second chance to spit in yer eyes. Now, can you tell me where in the bill (If you can even find it. I can't.) it will raise your income taxes? Is it hidden in there with the "Death Panel" language? Or maybe the part that shuffles billions to Big Insurance and Big Pharma. I think it's hidden there. Honestly, if it's loyalty you want, buy a dog. Tune in to Rachel Maddow, your view of reality could improve.
>> Obot DaveM Tuesday, December 22, 2009 10:10 PM Report Comment
To E. Mazer: The Senate used to be a bastion of integrity? Of what period in American history are you alluding to sir? If indeed the Senate has ever been a bastion of anything, it would be of the self-interests of the upper class and big business! Do you truly believe that every single Republican senator that has voted against the Health Care Bill is doing so because of principle and integrity? Or could it be that these senators are receiving contributions from Private interests in the Health Insurance industry? Let’s think about that for a moment, shall we?
>> Carlos Wednesday, December 23, 2009 3:10 AM Report Comment
To Marie: Before telling others to get their facts in order, you should do so yourself. The President of the United States DOES have the power to veto any legislation that comes to him after being approved by both chambers of Congress. That is what is known as “Separation of Powers and, Checks and Balances.” This concept, originally conceived by the French philosophe (not philosopher) Montesquieu, was intended as a way of dividing the power of government into three equally balanced branches that could oversee the actions of the others in a way that would prevent any single one from becoming too powerful. Alas, no system is perfect, as we witnessed during the eight years of Executive abuse in the Bush/Cheney administration!
>> Carlos Wednesday, December 23, 2009 3:18 AM Report Comment
To Judy (1): Madam, the first problem I have with what you wrote is that you are throwing numbers around without any sort of evidence or research to back up your numbers. This offends me as a political scientist and as an economist! With a little research you can find the following information: "On the day President Bush took office, the national debt stood at $5.727 trillion. The latest number from the Treasury Department shows the national debt now stands at more than $9.849 trillion. That’s a 71.9 percent increase on Mr. Bush’s watch." (http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/09/29/couricandco/entry4486228.shtml)
>> Carlos Wednesday, December 23, 2009 3:24 AM Report Comment
To Judy (2): What you are referring to is the 2008 budget deficit, which was indeed $455 billion with a B. That was the deficit of ONE year. The national debt of that same year increased by One Trillion dollars….that’s trillion with a B. Here is some info on that: during 2008 the budget deficit was $455 billion but the national debt increased by $1 trillion, the first time it has done so in a single year. The total debt has increased over $500 billion each year since FY 2003, considering both budgeted and non-budgeted spending. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._national_debt)
>> Carlos Wednesday, December 23, 2009 3:28 AM Report Comment
To Judy (3): Secondly, I have a problem with your response to Mark in which you refer to President Obama as “HIS” president! Are you not American? You do understand that President Obama is President of the United States right? That means he is the president of all Americans, not only of those that voted for him! Believe me, I wish each one of us could decide if we wanted an elected official to represent us or not, so I could say that President George W. Bush was “your” president and not "mine", because that man was an embarassment, a buffoon and a donkey’s ass. Nonetheless, he was my president for 8 years, just like President Obama is currently YOUR president!
>> Carlos Wednesday, December 23, 2009 3:35 AM Report Comment
Finally, to Hobie: If you want to accuse any administration of corruption, start with the Bush administration, ok? Why don’t you look up HALLIBURTON, and that company’s connection to Lord Cheney and the Bush Administration, as well as with the Iraq War. Perhaps if you leave your bias aside, you may learn something about the wickedness of true corruption…the one that puts profit margins before the lives of our soldiers and of the thousands of innocent Iraqi citizens that have died to make these scumbags billions of dollars!!!!
>> Carlos Wednesday, December 23, 2009 3:39 AM Report Comment
I think if you'll carefully reread my comments, Carlos, you'll notice I refrained from referencing any particular administration or political party.
>> Hobie Wednesday, December 23, 2009 9:06 AM Report Comment
Carlos, You are wrong about the veto power of the president. If Congress decides to get two-thirds majority they can override the veto. Throwing around the idea that your political scientist and economic background gives you the right to detail us to death shows how ignorant you are with your fulsome facts. And the word trillion begins with a T not a B as you so commented to Judy. If you are sourcing information from Wikipedia, I would use discretion. The accuracy is considerably suspect. Their Moderators consistently delete items that they do no like because I have seen it done. It cannot be changed if they lock that subject. If President Obama would ACT like he is president of all Americans, we would feel that he is "ours"
>> mk212 Wednesday, December 23, 2009 9:27 AM Report Comment
Please tell me how President Obama should act if he wants to be seen as a "real" President.
>> Mark Wednesday, December 23, 2009 1:13 PM Report Comment
Show his real birth certificate? :-) Sarcasm intended.
>> mk212 Wednesday, December 23, 2009 5:39 PM Report Comment
oh, you are a birther. Do you also howl at the full moon?
>> Mark Wednesday, December 23, 2009 6:37 PM Report Comment
Did you read the post? Do you know the meaning of sarcasm? Your humor is lacking.
>> mk212 Wednesday, December 23, 2009 7:29 PM Report Comment
I was as serious as a heart attack!
>> Mark Wednesday, December 23, 2009 7:45 PM Report Comment
My Cardiologist will see you know. Better get it done now before government health care takes effect in 2013.
>> mk212 Wednesday, December 23, 2009 10:18 PM Report Comment
Sheesh, can't even spell before suggesting an appointment with my cardiologist "now". Exhaustion takes its toll after a long day at the grind. Sorry for the levity.
>> mk212 Wednesday, December 23, 2009 10:25 PM Report Comment
Liberals protest against war, conservatives protest against health care. What a world we live in...
>> Mark Thursday, December 24, 2009 12:19 AM Report Comment