- Transparency Advocates Agree: White House Has Been "Useless" (CFA Site »)
- Rick Larsen Campaign Caught Telling Lies about the “No New Taxes” Pledge
Thursday, September 9, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 8, 2010
- President Clings to Failure, Ignores Obvious Solutions
- Denny Heck Campaign Caught Telling Lies about the “No New Taxes” Pledge
- Video: JFK vs. Obama on Tax Cuts
- Big Labor Backs Democrats in Hopes of a Pension Bailout (AWF Site »)
- Teacher's Pensions: Overblown and Underfunded (AWF Site »)
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
- Lassa Campaign Following the Tactics of the DCCC in WI-07
- Fact Checking President Obama's Labor Day Speech (AWF Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight September 7, 2010
- Senator Kerry at it Again
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
- Flush With Union Cash, DC Mayoral Candidate Vincent Gray Looks to Roll Back DC School Reform
Sunday, September 5, 2010
- Maryland Ranks as 47th State to Celebrate COGD (CFA Site »)
Saturday, September 4, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 3, 2010
- Dina Titus Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge is Thoroughly Misleading
-
120 Days to Go Until the
Largest Tax Hikes in History - Government vs. Private Control and "Balkanization" of the Internet
-
Get 'Em While They're Hot:
Medicine Cabinet Tax Hits in 120 Days
Friday, September 3, 2010
- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
Thursday, August 26, 2010
Senator Inhofe Urges EPA to Reconsider Endangerment Findings
From Christopher Prandoni on Thursday, February 25, 2010 1:41 PMDear Senator Inhofe:
On behalf of Americans for Tax Reform, and millions of taxpayers, I would like to thank you for your report titled Consensus Exposed: The CRU controversy, which formally requested the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to reconsider its endangerment finding on the basis that they relied on the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports, which have now been revealed to be full of faulty science.
Your response to the EPA’s endangerment findings is wholly appropriate given the de-legitimization of the once esteemed University of East Anglia‘s Climatic Research Unit (CRU), and subsequently, the United Nation’s IPCC reports, many of which were authored by CRU scientists or drew heavily from CRU findings.
Unable to pass comprehensive climate legislation through Congress, members of the current administration have attempted to shape American energy policy via the EPA, a contentious point your report confronts head on. Questioning the EPA’s authority to implement broad energy regulation while challenging the justification for such regulation, your thorough report rebuts EPA’s most convincing arguments.
This refutation of the EPA is critical because of the enormous impact EPA regulation or cap-and-trade like legislation would have on American people and American businesses. The EPA should not be the chief regulator of America’s economy.
The effect of suggested energy taxes would be devastating; resulting in lost income, lost jobs, and higher energy prices. Energy taxes deter foreign investment negatively impacting future growth. In order to compensate for higher energy prices, American companies would be forced to raise the price of their products, reduce their payroll, or ship jobs overseas. Higher energy prices directly affect consumers as Americans will see their energy bills soar. None of these results are desirable.
I would like to commend your efforts in standing up for taxpayers, small businesses, consumers and American family’s nationwide. Thank you for your leadership.
Onward,
Grover G. Norquist
GGH/bmj
Cc: All Members of the US Senate
Lisa Jackson, EPA Administrator














Add a Comment