Tax Reform ATR believes that all consumed income should be taxed one time, at one low and flat rate. Link
Banning styrofoam would have negative consequences for small businesses and consumers: http://t.co/Upjes6JZ2L
taxreformer
Cutting the Red Tape: @RepGarrett's SEC Accountability Act: http://t.co/dAMtRAWokI
taxreformer
New @simplertaxes project is a virtual suggestions box for the federal government: http://t.co/l1VmdjO2mE #RATEreform
taxreformer
Gov. Bob McDonnell fails Virginia taxpayers by signing his massive tax hike into law: http://t.co/8ENkqOlelO
taxreformer
The next European-style, nanny state ban? Styrofoam: http://t.co/Upjes6JZ2L
taxreformer
Virginia Republicans must protect taxpayers from Gov. McDonnell's $5.9 billion tax hike: http://t.co/8ENkqOlelO
taxreformer
1,700 days and counting since the first #KeystoneXL Pipeline proposal: http://t.co/xWYHWYGxkm
taxreformer
New bill from @RepGarrett aims to keep the SEC accountable for out-of-control regulations: http://t.co/dAMtRAWokI
taxreformer
Don't say they didn't warn you. Under Obamacare, the IRS will soon be given greater audit powers: http://t.co/Y3QQhdVmYX
taxreformer
Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell cements his tax-hiking legacy with $5.9 billion transportation bill: http://t.co/8ENkqOlelO
taxreformer
Dear Senator Inhofe:
On behalf of Americans for Tax Reform, and millions of taxpayers, I would like to thank you for your report titled Consensus Exposed: The CRU controversy, which formally requested the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to reconsider its endangerment finding on the basis that they relied on the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports, which have now been revealed to be full of faulty science.
Your response to the EPA’s endangerment findings is wholly appropriate given the de-legitimization of the once esteemed University of East Anglia‘s Climatic Research Unit (CRU), and subsequently, the United Nation’s IPCC reports, many of which were authored by CRU scientists or drew heavily from CRU findings.
Unable to pass comprehensive climate legislation through Congress, members of the current administration have attempted to shape American energy policy via the EPA, a contentious point your report confronts head on. Questioning the EPA’s authority to implement broad energy regulation while challenging the justification for such regulation, your thorough report rebuts EPA’s most convincing arguments.
This refutation of the EPA is critical because of the enormous impact EPA regulation or cap-and-trade like legislation would have on American people and American businesses. The EPA should not be the chief regulator of America’s economy.
The effect of suggested energy taxes would be devastating; resulting in lost income, lost jobs, and higher energy prices. Energy taxes deter foreign investment negatively impacting future growth. In order to compensate for higher energy prices, American companies would be forced to raise the price of their products, reduce their payroll, or ship jobs overseas. Higher energy prices directly affect consumers as Americans will see their energy bills soar. None of these results are desirable.
I would like to commend your efforts in standing up for taxpayers, small businesses, consumers and American family’s nationwide. Thank you for your leadership.
Onward,
Grover G. Norquist
GGH/bmj
Cc: All Members of the US Senate
Lisa Jackson, EPA Administrator
To follow Chris Prandoni's RSS feed click here. To follow them on Twitter, their handle is @ChrisPrandoni