- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
- Washington Welcomes Cost of Government Day (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
- Government Workers' Pensions are Underfunded by $3 Trillion
Monday, August 23, 2010
- Fourteen Ways to Reduce Government Spending
- FCC Report on Broadband Performance: A Scare Tactic
- Sen. Al Franken Doesn’t Understand Wireless Networks...or the First Amendment
Friday, August 20, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 19, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
Real Men of Genius - DC City Council Edition: Cigarette Tax Hike Reduces Revenue
From Patrick Gleason
Yesterday Washington, DC's Chief Financial Officer, Natwar Gandhi, sent a letter to Mayor Fenty informing him that new estimates show revenues in the current budget to be $17 million shy of initial projections. A big reason for the downward revision: the recent cigarette tax increase.
DC City Council members raised DC's cigarette excise tax 50 cents last year, bringing the rate to $2.50 per pack. The council members, in their infinite wisdom, failed to consider the effect that would be had by raising the District's cigarette tax rate 25% higher than neighboring Maryland and a whopping 733% higher than is levied across the river in Virginia.
It gets better. Not only do new estimates show the tax hike will bring in $15 million less than was originally projected, cigarette tax revenue is expected to actually be $7.6 million less than pre-hike levels.In his letter to Fenty, Gandhi noted:
"future increases in the tax rate will likely generate less revenue."
The Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids recently published a report claiming that a dollar per pack increase in cigarette excise taxes would raise revenue in every state, including Washington, DC. DC's budget revisions and Gandhi's conclusions show that claim to be false and should call the entire report into question.
Lawmakers in Georgia and South Carolina, where cigarette tax hikes are currently under consideration, would be wise to learn from Washington's mistake, which yet again proves that cigarette tax hikes are bad policy and a dubious source of revenue. Furthermore, cigarette tax increases serve as nothing more than a place holder for future tax increases on income, property, sales, and other goods and services.
Other examples of failed cigarette tax hikes are abound:
~ New Jersey raised the cigarette tax 17.5 cents in 2007. They collected $52 million less than they had projected and $22 million below what they collected before the tax hike.
~ After Maryland raised the cigarette tax $1 in 2007, sales dropped by 25% and there was a 254% increase in cigarettes illegally crossing state lines.
~ Arkansas passed a 56-cent tax hike on cigarettes in February 2009. On the heels of the federal cigarette tax increase, the bill was estimated to bring in $86 million, but the projection was lowered to $72 million just one month after passage. Then, in December, the Department of Finance and Administration predicted a $10.3 million drop in tobacco tax collections.
~ Mississippi raised the cigarette tax by 50-cents in May 2009. The hike was expected to raise $113 million in the first year, but by August projections were already off by $4.7 million.
~ Rhode Island raised the cigarette tax by $1 to $3.46 per pack last year. By November revenue projections were down by $7.7 million.
Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: TAXES, TOBACCO, TOLDYOUSO, DistrictofColumbia














Comments
Cigarette taxes are just another failed social engineering project. They're also regressive taxes which disproportionately hurt the poor. And if they're hardly even generating any significant revenue, as the post suggests, they just seem completely pointless.
>> Kevin, SC Thursday, February 25, 2010 11:10 AM Report Comment
This is more than just a simple tax increase on a product... this is another example of how liberals feel they can regulate "behavior" on the American people. Yes it hurts the economic output, and the tax is regressive in nature; but simply put, the government want s to tell you what you can and can't put into your body.
>> Bill, GA Thursday, February 25, 2010 1:37 PM Report Comment
TObaccofreekids operates on faulty reasoning and half truths. I'm glad there is something that slaps them in their hippie mouths!
>> Sanchez Thursday, February 25, 2010 4:40 PM Report Comment
An interesting blog post that uses this to look at other proposed taxes...i especially like the idea of the effect of dc being a commuter city http://blogs.seattleweekly.com/dailyweekly/2010/02/washington_cigarettes_to_have.php
>> bgall Friday, February 26, 2010 11:13 AM Report Comment