| Editorials and Opinion Pieces
Power
to the Taxpayer
BY: Grover Norquist, special
to the Washington Times
DATE: January 15, 1999
SECTION: PART A; COMMENTARY; Pg. A16.
LENGTH: 674 words
In his State of the State Address, New York Gov. George Pataki boldly
called on the legislature to adopt a constitutional amendment to require
a two-thirds supermajority to raise taxes for the state. "The act
of raising taxes is a destructive act, and should therefore be a difficult
act," said Mr. Pataki.
I couldn't
agree with him more. In D.C. and in state capitals across America, there
is an inherent bias toward increased spending over reducing taxes, a
supermajority requirement would properly make tax increses more difficult
and begin to focus government policy on cutting wasteful spending rather
than increasing taxes. Opponents of Mr. Pataki's plan to require a supermajority
vote to approve all tax increases will argue it is contrary to majority
rule. They will argue that all business should be conducted as 50 percent
plus 1. However, there are 10 instances in the U.S. Constitution which
require a two-thirds vote and each state has similar constitutional
provisions. In addition, taxes in many cases last just as long as constitutional
amendments. New Yorkers, and the rest of the country are still paying
a 3 percent telephone tax that was first instituted to pay for the Spanish-American
War. Last time we checked that war has been over for a while. Taxpayer
advocates learned long ago that entrenched taxes are very difficult
to remove from the code.
Supermajority
protection for taxpayers has been sweeping the nation since 1978, when
California voters overwhelmingly approved Proposition 13. That was the
opening shot of the anti-tax movement that swept Ronald Reagan into
the presidency two years later. Today there are 14 states with supermajority
requirements for tax increases, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado,
Delaware, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, Oklahoma,
Oregon, South Dakota and Washington.
The
drive for supermajority requirements to protect taxpayers continues
strongly. Mr. Pataki joins Gov. John Engler of Michigan, Gov. Tom Ridge
of Pennsylvania and Gov. Christine Todd Whitman of New Jersey and Gov.
Edward Schafer of North Dakota, who all have begun campaigns in their
respective states to enact a constitutional requirement for a supermajority
vote to raise taxes in their state. Over the next two years with Washington
in gridlock, Republican governors are going to be the driving force
of the GOP. Almost all Republican governors, both conservative and moderate
share the goal of protecting taxpayers from easy tax increases.
Since
1995, Congress votes each and every April 15 on the Tax Limitation Amendment
sponsored by Reps. Joe Barton, Texas Republican, John Shaddeg, Arizona
Republican, and Ralph Hall, Texas Democrat, and by Sens. Jon Kyl, Arizona
Republican. This annual vote for the two-thirds supermajority requirement
to raise taxes has been held every year since the Republicans took the
Congress. Speaker Dennis Hastert and Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott
promise the vote will take place each year until the amendment passes.
Voters
agree with Mr. Pataki's plan. According to the polling company, 68 percent
of voters would be more likely to support a complete overhaul of the
tax system if it included a two-thirds supermajority. Seventy-five percent
said they would be more likely to vote for their current member of Congress
if they voted for a two-thirds supermajority. And 78 percent would feel
more confident of their state taxes if they learned their state has
a two-thirds supermajority requirement such as that in California.
Taxpayers
in New York and around the country appreciate the leadership of Mr.
Pataki on this issue. Not only will his efforts protect taxpayers in
the state of New York, it will help the efforts of pro-taxpayer members
of Congress extend this protection to federal taxes. With the hard work
of fiscally conservative governors like Mr. Pataki, someday all taxpayers
will have this protection against tax increases.
|