- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
- Washington Welcomes Cost of Government Day (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
- Government Workers' Pensions are Underfunded by $3 Trillion
Monday, August 23, 2010
- Fourteen Ways to Reduce Government Spending
- FCC Report on Broadband Performance: A Scare Tactic
- Sen. Al Franken Doesn’t Understand Wireless Networks...or the First Amendment
Friday, August 20, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 19, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
The Pelosi-Obama-Reid 'Tax Cut' Is Largely Just Spending
From Ryan Ellis on Monday, January 26, 2009 12:15 PM• The Pelosi-Obama-Reid regime likes to say they’re giving “tax cuts” to “hundreds of millions of American families.” The method of choice is “refundable tax credits.” Under their plan, even those with $0 income tax liability would receive a check from the government. Thanks to income eligibility phase-outs, many of the recipients of refundable tax credits are low- and moderate-income families with little or no income tax liability;
• According to the IRS, 46 million of the 138 million tax returns filed (33 percent) have no income tax liability. Yet these 46 million households would still be able to receive refundable credits, despite having zero income tax liability;1
• Pelosi-Obama-Reid often respond that these families have payroll tax (Social Security and Medicare tax, otherwise known as “FICA”) liabilities, so refundable credits are meant to “refund” these taxes;
• Citing payroll taxes is a willful intent to mislead. Under current tax rules, the refundable Earned Income Credit and Additional Child Tax Credit already remove both income and payroll tax liability for 15 million filers (or 11 percent of families). These people neither have an income tax liability nor a payroll tax liability, yet would be getting a “tax cut” under Pelosi-Obama-Reid;2
• For some taxpayers, a refundable credit may reduce federal income tax owed. For others, it may be totally free money. For still others, it might zero out tax liability, with the rest being free money. The point is that all refundable credits are tax cuts for some, but free money for most. Congressional Democrats’ official tax scorekeeper, the Joint Tax Committee, calls the spending parts of refundable credits “outlay effects” and the tax cut parts “revenue effects.” Thus, even JCT admits that refundable credits are largely spending;
• So the next time Pelosi-Obama-Reid touts a big tax cut, ask how much of it is actually just spending money on people who don’t pay taxes.
For more information, contact Ryan Ellis at ATR by emailing him at rellis@atr.org
1 Internal Revenue Service. “Statistics of Income.” Tax Year 2006, Table 2.
2 Data obtained by Joint Tax Committee via GOP Staff of House Ways and Means Committee














Comments
Apparently President Obama, Congressman Reid and Speaker of the House do not realize that Social Security Taxes and Medicare Taxes (FICA Taxes) are not eligible for deductions from Income Tax returns. So, in addition to receiving a tax refund when they have no refund due, they also receive credit for paying FICA Taxes and a bonus refund.
>> Francis Vouri Monday, February 23, 2009 4:26 PM Report Comment
YOU ARE SPENDING AMERICA INTO BANKRUPTCY. PRESIDENT OBAMA SAYS WE ARE BROKE. IF YOU ARE BROKE, DO YOU BUY A HOUSE, CAR, ETC.? WASHINGTON'S LIST FOR POWER IS ARROGANT. IT'S TIME TO LISTEN TO THE PEOPLE AND LOOK AT THE POLLS. I LOOK FORWARD TO ELECTION DAY WHEN PEOPLE WILL BE VOTING AGAINST INCUMBENTS INSTEAD OF VOTING FOR DEMOCRATS OR REPUBLICANS.
>> Janice Waddell Tuesday, December 15, 2009 11:50 PM Report Comment