Tax Reform ATR believes that all consumed income should be taxed one time, at one low and flat rate. Link
Groups who advocated for the IRS to prepare tax returns sure look foolish these days: http://t.co/oKvpIofu7Y
taxreformer
"We don't need the federal government mandating additional taxes..." -@MarshaBlackburn on MFA: http://t.co/lAuLJtr5t3 #NoNetTax
taxreformer
Health insurers and businesses are already feeling the iron-clad grip of regulations in #Obamacare: http://t.co/J6dfnKqFYZ
taxreformer
Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell Signs Largest Tax Hike in Virginia History into Law http://t.co/Qd6KOFfaPv
taxreformer
Under #Obamacare, mothers have had a tougher time purchasing non-prescription, over-the-counter medicine: http://t.co/dJuaGAT9LE
taxreformer
9 out of 20 #Obamacare tax hikes have not even been implemented yet: http://t.co/opFkyf1guJ
taxreformer
.@GroverNorquist on MFA: "[The Senate] didn't ask all of the questions that needed to be asked": http://t.co/wXfkIR2Ca9 #NoNetTax
taxreformer
"When architects of #Obamacare are worried about it creating a trainwreck, you know something's gone terribly wrong": http://t.co/J6dfnKqFYZ
taxreformer
Conservative and Free Market Groups Applaud Move to Delay a Vote on Gina McCarthy: http://t.co/lNQYmJAB12 #EPA
taxreformer
The #Obamacare train wreck will derail the American economy: http://t.co/opFkyf1guJ
taxreformer
There are three sources today (WSJ, Time, and an op-ed in IBD) which suggest that slowing down the pace at which the tax code is indexed to inflation is not a tax hike. It's also suggested that this is being discussed as part of the debt limit negotiatons.
This idea would most certainly be a tax hike.
Tax brackets and other tax benefits are tied to the consumer price index (CPI). There are several ways to measure CPI, including a measurement which is less fast-paced than the CPI measurement used today. The idea is to use this alternative definition of CPI to slow down the inflation adjustments in the tax code.
This would mean that tax bracket thresholds would grow more slowly. This would be a legislated tax change scored by the Joint Tax Committee as a net tax hike, and for good reason: it would change tax law, forcing people to pay more in taxes than they otherwise would have.
It's also a partial return to "bracket creep," the 1970s phenomenon whereby people were pushed into higher tax brackets even though their real standard of living didn't rise at all.
This idea can of course be part of a discussion of comprehensive and revenue-neutral tax reform, but stand-alone it is a tax hike.
To follow Ryan Ellis's RSS feed click here. To follow them on Twitter, their handle is @ryanlellis