- Transparency Advocates Agree: White House Has Been "Useless" (CFA Site »)
- Rick Larsen Campaign Caught Telling Lies about the “No New Taxes” Pledge
Thursday, September 9, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 8, 2010
- President Clings to Failure, Ignores Obvious Solutions
- Denny Heck Campaign Caught Telling Lies about the “No New Taxes” Pledge
- Video: JFK vs. Obama on Tax Cuts
- Big Labor Backs Democrats in Hopes of a Pension Bailout (AWF Site »)
- Teacher's Pensions: Overblown and Underfunded (AWF Site »)
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
- Lassa Campaign Following the Tactics of the DCCC in WI-07
- Fact Checking President Obama's Labor Day Speech (AWF Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight September 7, 2010
- Senator Kerry at it Again
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
- Flush With Union Cash, DC Mayoral Candidate Vincent Gray Looks to Roll Back DC School Reform
Sunday, September 5, 2010
- Maryland Ranks as 47th State to Celebrate COGD (CFA Site »)
Saturday, September 4, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 3, 2010
- Dina Titus Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge is Thoroughly Misleading
-
120 Days to Go Until the
Largest Tax Hikes in History - Government vs. Private Control and "Balkanization" of the Internet
-
Get 'Em While They're Hot:
Medicine Cabinet Tax Hits in 120 Days
Friday, September 3, 2010
- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
Thursday, August 26, 2010
We Ought Focus On Cutting Taxes & Spending, Not Deficits
From Tim Andrews on Tuesday, March 9, 2010 1:07 PMHarvard economist Greg Mankiw has a great analogy of how the current plans by the Administration to "reduce" the deficit work: Imagine you have a friend who has a budget problem. Every month he spends more than he earns. His credit card bills are piling up. He is clearly on an unsustainable path. Then one day he comes to you with an idea.
Friend: I am going to take off a few days from work and fly down to Bermuda for a quick vacation.
You: But isn't that expensive? Won't that just add to your growing debts?
Friend: Yes, it is expensive. But my plan is deficit-neutral. I have decided to give up that half-caf, extra shot caramel macchiato I order at Starbucks twice every day. I really don't need that expensive drink. And if I give it up for the next three years, it will pay for my Bermuda trip.
You: Well, then, how are you going to solve the problem of your growing debts?
Friend: I am going to figure that out as soon as I return from Bermuda.
You: But in light of your budget problem, maybe you should give up Starbucks and skip the Bermuda vacation. Giving up Starbucks could be the easiest way to start balancing your budget.
Friend: You really aren't any fun, are you?
He concludes "Even if you believe that the spending cuts and tax increases in the bill make it deficit-neutral, the legislation will still make solving the problem of the fiscal imbalance harder, because it will use up some of the easier ways to close the shortfall"
As we have said previously, the explosion in government spending to fund the Administration's proposed health care takeover won't be deficit neutral. It will - without a doubt - add to our mountain of unsustainable debt. But, even if you live in the same fantasy world where the Administration seems to live, and believe it will be deficit neutral, this is NOT in any way, shape, or form, a policy that will improve our financial situation. To say we'll increase spending and taxes, and then hope for the best, is pure folly.
The ONLY way forward is to dramatically cut government spending, and simultaneously reduce the taxes that are crippling our economy.
Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: TAXES, HEALTHCARE, SPENDING, Federal














Comments
...edit your stuff!
>> juan carlos Tuesday, March 9, 2010 3:07 PM Report Comment
That is a fantastic analogy, and a great illustration of the absurdity of the politicians' "deficit-reduction" game.
>> James, MD Tuesday, March 9, 2010 3:34 PM Report Comment