- Transparency Advocates Agree: White House Has Been "Useless" (CFA Site »)
- Rick Larsen Campaign Caught Telling Lies about the “No New Taxes” Pledge
Thursday, September 9, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 8, 2010
- President Clings to Failure, Ignores Obvious Solutions
- Denny Heck Campaign Caught Telling Lies about the “No New Taxes” Pledge
- Video: JFK vs. Obama on Tax Cuts
- Big Labor Backs Democrats in Hopes of a Pension Bailout (AWF Site »)
- Teacher's Pensions: Overblown and Underfunded (AWF Site »)
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
- Lassa Campaign Following the Tactics of the DCCC in WI-07
- Fact Checking President Obama's Labor Day Speech (AWF Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight September 7, 2010
- Senator Kerry at it Again
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
- Flush With Union Cash, DC Mayoral Candidate Vincent Gray Looks to Roll Back DC School Reform
Sunday, September 5, 2010
- Maryland Ranks as 47th State to Celebrate COGD (CFA Site »)
Saturday, September 4, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 3, 2010
- Dina Titus Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge is Thoroughly Misleading
-
120 Days to Go Until the
Largest Tax Hikes in History - Government vs. Private Control and "Balkanization" of the Internet
-
Get 'Em While They're Hot:
Medicine Cabinet Tax Hits in 120 Days
Friday, September 3, 2010
- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
Thursday, August 26, 2010
How Obamacare Will Hurt Poor Women & Children Most
From Tim Andrews on Monday, March 8, 2010 3:28 PMIt is a strange day when we at ATR start quoting Ezra Klein approvingly. But, here goes. Late last year, Mr. Klein wrote in the Washington Post that the Senate Healthcare Bill would hurt women and children the most:
[This Bill] ;penalizes employers for hiringlow-income workers who are eligible for subsidies. That will create an incentive to do one of two things: Don't hire low-income workers (hire a teenager looking for a job rather than a single mother, or hire a housewife looking for a second job rather than an unemployed breadwinner), or hire illegal immigrants.And it actually gets worse...it not only discriminates against low-income workers, but itparticularly discriminates against low-income parents. Single mothers will get the worst deal, as they have lower incomes, and as you might expect, children who need health care.
A provision in the legislation penalizes firms who don't provide a level of insurance coverage comparable to the government-set "minimum essential coverage" IF at least one of their employees must use government subsidies to be able to afford the employer-provided coverage. In other words, if tax dollars are paying for the insurance of even one employee and the firm doesn't provide the minimum coverage, it will face substantial financial penalties.
The idea, of course, is to force firms to provide the minimum coverage. But, alas, the more likely response by firms is to not hire employees who are likely to need subsidies to cover their costs because that will mean the firm has to spend more on providing insurance to employees. Who are those employees likely to be? Lower-income folks and especially those who need more expensive family policies. In fact, the penalties are higher if the subsidized worker has a family. A prediction would be that more single moms will find themselves out of work; Once again, government intervention produces not only results the opposite of its intentions, but harms the most vulnerable in the process.
So that's Obamacare for you. Hurting everyone, but low income women with kids the most.














Add a Comment