Tax Reform ATR believes that all consumed income should be taxed one time, at one low and flat rate. Link
Jim Pendergraph Supports $2 Trillion Tax Hike http://t.co/LF6ieJuZ
taxreformer
Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley: Barack Obama, Jr. http://t.co/lzrcRtSj
taxreformer
EPA's War on Fossil Fuels http://t.co/gzORlViU
taxreformer
Less Waste, More Transparency in Government Broadband Loans http://t.co/RrWuq3O3
taxreformer
Check out @Union_Facts’ new #Crony2012 campaign exposing President Obama’s corrupt relationship with Big Labor http://t.co/5aDnKJUQ
taxreformer
Tom Cross's Hope for Change to Obamacare http://t.co/Isu5I7kK
taxreformer
RT @ChrisPrandoni: My new column exposing Obama's plan to kill coal via @townhallcom http://t.co/2fEqWUdU via
ChrisPrandoni
Blog: Tom Cross's hope for change to Obamacare - http://t.co/g6OFzp73 #atr ^
joshuaculling
ATR Urges North Carolina Legislators to Reject Anti-Free Enterprise Protectionism http://t.co/RIg4ejSB
taxreformer
ATR Releases 2012 List of State Taxpayer Protection Pledge Signers for May 22 Primaries http://t.co/maSodrTt
taxreformer
It is a strange day when we at ATR start quoting Ezra Klein approvingly. But, here goes. Late last year, Mr. Klein wrote in the Washington Post that the Senate Healthcare Bill would hurt women and children the most:
[This Bill] ;penalizes employers for hiringlow-income workers who are eligible for subsidies. That will create an incentive to do one of two things: Don't hire low-income workers (hire a teenager looking for a job rather than a single mother, or hire a housewife looking for a second job rather than an unemployed breadwinner), or hire illegal immigrants.And it actually gets worse...it not only discriminates against low-income workers, but itparticularly discriminates against low-income parents. Single mothers will get the worst deal, as they have lower incomes, and as you might expect, children who need health care.
A provision in the legislation penalizes firms who don't provide a level of insurance coverage comparable to the government-set "minimum essential coverage" IF at least one of their employees must use government subsidies to be able to afford the employer-provided coverage. In other words, if tax dollars are paying for the insurance of even one employee and the firm doesn't provide the minimum coverage, it will face substantial financial penalties.
The idea, of course, is to force firms to provide the minimum coverage. But, alas, the more likely response by firms is to not hire employees who are likely to need subsidies to cover their costs because that will mean the firm has to spend more on providing insurance to employees. Who are those employees likely to be? Lower-income folks and especially those who need more expensive family policies. In fact, the penalties are higher if the subsidized worker has a family. A prediction would be that more single moms will find themselves out of work; Once again, government intervention produces not only results the opposite of its intentions, but harms the most vulnerable in the process.
So that's Obamacare for you. Hurting everyone, but low income women with kids the most.