Tax Reform ATR believes that all consumed income should be taxed one time, at one low and flat rate. Link
Groups who advocated for the IRS to prepare tax returns sure look foolish these days: http://t.co/oKvpIofu7Y
taxreformer
"We don't need the federal government mandating additional taxes..." -@MarshaBlackburn on MFA: http://t.co/lAuLJtr5t3 #NoNetTax
taxreformer
Health insurers and businesses are already feeling the iron-clad grip of regulations in #Obamacare: http://t.co/J6dfnKqFYZ
taxreformer
Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell Signs Largest Tax Hike in Virginia History into Law http://t.co/Qd6KOFfaPv
taxreformer
Under #Obamacare, mothers have had a tougher time purchasing non-prescription, over-the-counter medicine: http://t.co/dJuaGAT9LE
taxreformer
9 out of 20 #Obamacare tax hikes have not even been implemented yet: http://t.co/opFkyf1guJ
taxreformer
.@GroverNorquist on MFA: "[The Senate] didn't ask all of the questions that needed to be asked": http://t.co/wXfkIR2Ca9 #NoNetTax
taxreformer
"When architects of #Obamacare are worried about it creating a trainwreck, you know something's gone terribly wrong": http://t.co/J6dfnKqFYZ
taxreformer
Conservative and Free Market Groups Applaud Move to Delay a Vote on Gina McCarthy: http://t.co/lNQYmJAB12 #EPA
taxreformer
The #Obamacare train wreck will derail the American economy: http://t.co/opFkyf1guJ
taxreformer
This content is provided by Americans for Tax Reform Foundation.
Social Security was created in 1935 in order to provide a safety net to Americans without the ability to earn income. Over the past decades, the program has proliferated to the point of insolvency. In particular, Social Security’s Disability Insurance (DI) component has grown out of control and threatens the nation’s finances as well as the fundamental principle that citizens should not be reliant on government.
Like many government programs, DI grew rapidly in the years preceding the Reagan presidency. While benefits were collected by less than 800,000 individuals in 1960, 5.22 million people participated in the program in the final year of Jimmy Carter’s presidency, 1980.
Claiming accurately that there was “widespread abuse of the system which should not be allowed to continue,” President Reagan set about curbing the growth of the Disability Insurance program. He directed his Department of Health and Human Services to conduct reviews of DI claims. At the same time, the economy grew rapidly after the early 1980s recession ended.
The result was a significant departure from the upward trend in program participants of previous years. In the first two years of Reagan’s presidency, recipients of benefits fell from 5.01 million to 4.38 million, a 12.49 percent decrease. The demographic that saw the biggest drop in dependency was not disabled workers but rather able-bodied students ages 18 and 19 whose parents were classified as disabled. Between 1981 and 1983, the number of non-disabled adult beneficiaries of the DI program decreased by almost a full two thirds from nearly 150,000 to just over 50,000.
During the Obama administration, the DI program has grown at a rate similar to that at which it expanded before the Reagan presidency as the economy has struggled and eligibility has not been limited. Indeed, more Americans have gone on disability than have found jobs in the past three months. Between 2009 and 2011, total recipients are up over nine percent to 11.74 million, and the non-disabled adult subcategory has also risen. The average monthly benefit, which was $475.70 in 1985, became $1188.80 by 2011; the growth in average benefits has significantly outpaced inflation.

The problem of the DI program’s recent growth has rightly attracted congressional attention. Senator Jeff Sessions, Ranking Member of the Senate Budget Committee, recently requested a report on this topic from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). The report came to several unsettling conclusions, including a finding that the number of beneficiaries as a percentage of the population age 20 to 64 has risen rapidly. A press release from the Senate Budget Committee Republicans also notes that the program’s trust fund is expected to be exhausted as early as 2016 and that known overpayments to beneficiaries are common.
What has happened to the DI component of Social Security is in line with a pattern of increasing reliance on government amidst a floundering recovery under President Obama that contrasts sharply with the drop in government transfer payments that accompanied the solid growth overseen by President Reagan. As weary Americans search for solutions that will return the nation to prosperity, they ought to look to Reagan’s legacy of concurrently expanding the economy by instituting market-based reforms and reducing dependence.
This content is provided by Americans for Tax Reform Foundation. To donate to ATRF, click here.