- Obama Proposes Over $220 Billion in New Energy Taxes
- Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy Releases Local Transparency Study for VA (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
- New Transparency Resource for Connecticut Taxpayers (CFA Site »)
- Colorado Senate Debates "Dirty Dozen" Tax Package
- About Those Jobs Numbers (CFA Site »)
- More Job Creation By The Federal Government
Monday, February 8, 2010
- Van Taylor, candidate for Texas State House, Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- February 6, 2010: Ronald Reagan Day
Saturday, February 6, 2010
- The Obama Budget
- Obama Feels International Pressure to Pass FTAs
- Let's Expedite Debate on Spending Reductions! (CFA Site »)
- Bipartisan Reform Commissions - a Comparison (CFA Site »)
- Obama Should Cooperate with Boehner and Cantor to Force Debate on Spending Reductions
- Not All Bipartisan Reform Commissions Are Created Equal
- Populist Politicians Use Poultry to Pontificate and Pander (ASA Site »)
- The Hidden Tax Hikes in the Obama Budget
Friday, February 5, 2010
- PACT Act May Reduce Tax Hike Pressures
- Arizona Congressional Candidate Eric Wnuck Signs the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- David Schweikert Signs the Taxpayer Protection Pledge for Congressional Race
- ATR and CFA Will Rate House Vote Against Debt Ceiling Hike and PAYGO
- Why Everyone Should be Worried About Craig Becker (and why Scott Brown needs to stop him)
Thursday, February 4, 2010
- New UAW Union-Foxwoods Contract Will Cost Connecticut Casinos Millions (AWF Site »)
- Guess Where Politicians From Socialised Medicine Countries Go For Healthcare...
- De-Facto Card Check Vote Coming Soon
- De-Facto Card Check Vote Coming Soon (AWF Site »)
- Grover Norquist Urges Senators to CoSponsor Non-Government Spending Jobs Bill
- Jim Ward Signs the Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Arizona Congressional Race
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
- Good Evening Arizona Pledge Breakers
- The Obama Budget and Small Business
- Administration Pushes Ahead With Internet Takeover
- SEIU Response to Lobbying Investigation Tongue-Tied (AWF Site »)
- Brewer Sales Tax Hike Passed out of Senate Committee
- A Senate Vote for Craig Becker, NLRB Nom, is a Vote For Card Check (AWF Site »)
- Sound Tax Competition Policy From Switzerland
- U.S. Attorney Reviews AWF's Call for Probe of SEIU Activities with White House, Congress (AWF Site »)
- Colorado House Disregards U.S. and State Constitutions; Passes eTaxes (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- The President's Budget: No Fiscal Restraint in Sight
- Vulnerable Colorado Democrats Vote for Higher Taxes
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
- Colorado House Signs Off On Tax Package
- Do You Know Where Your Tax Dollars Go?
- US Attorney Reviews Call for Probe into SEIU President Andy Stern’s Lobbying Activities
- Property Rights is a Global Affair (PRA Site »)
- What does the "budget freeze" actually mean?
- Utah Legislators Paving the Way for Higher Taxes
- The Budget & International Tax Competition
- Initial Thoughts on the New Obama Budget
- Another Look At Employment Data
- Obama Labor Board Nominee, "workers should not be able to choose against having a union"
- State Level Taxpayer Protection Pledge Signers in Illinois
- Presidential Math: Failed Policies + More Failed Policies = More Jobs
Monday, February 1, 2010
- The Effects of the Mere Possibility of a Bank Tax on Your 401(k) (ASA Site »)
- Very well, so there is a 'job boom'
- Survey Says: Legal Downloading Not So Bad (PRA Site »)
- Post "Stimulus" Unemployment: A Historical Perspective
- Virginia Senator Janet D. Howell Doesn't Get It
- Trains, Pains, and a Whole Lot of Subsidies
- Do You Know Which Candidates in Illinois Have Signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge?
- State of the Union Myth/Fact: Obama's Taxes on Energy & Families
- Real Stimulus Georgians Can Believe In
- Stimulus II: A Sequel America Cannot Afford (ASA Site »)
- SOTU: The President's Misguided Take on Spending
Friday, January 29, 2010
- Colorado House Finance Committee Passes Cadre of Tax Hikes
-
State of the Union Myth/Fact:
Government-Run Healthcare - Colorado Legislature Kicks Off 2010 with an eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Beth Coulson Signs the Taxpayer Protection Pledge in 2010 Illinois House Race
-
State of the Union Myth/Fact:
Obama's New Taxes on Your 401(k) - Colorado Legislature Kicks Off 2010 with an eTax
-
GOP SC Gubernatorial Hopefuls Debate in Charleston Tonight,
ATR asks all to Sign Pledge
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Obama vs. Fact:
Taxes and the Latest Press Conference
From Ryan Ellis on Wednesday, March 25, 2009 12:23 PM
A Tax Cut for 95 Percent of Working Families?
OBAMA: “…this plan will provide a tax cut to 95 percent of all working families that will appear in people’s paychecks by April 1.”
FACT: Obama is referring to the “Making Work Pay” refundable tax credit, which will begin to show up in the form of less withholding from paychecks on April 1. This part of his statement is true. However, it’s impossible to cut taxes for “95 percent of working families.” According to IRS data, one-third of all income tax filers don’t have an income tax liability. About 15 percent of all working families don’t even have a FICA tax liability, and these numbers are before taking into effect all the new refundable tax credits of the Obama budget. For these “working families,” all Obama’s budget will do is cut them a welfare check.
Is the Tax Code Skewed Toward the Rich?
OBAMA: “…for the top 5 percent, they’re the ones who typically saw huge gains in their income…let’s not renew the Bush tax cuts…let’s go back to the rates that existed…during the Clinton era”
FACT: Obama gives the impression here that the tax code has gotten friendlier to the rich since the Clinton years. A simple check of the data, though, shows that the rich are paying a higher percentage of federal income taxes than ever before.
In order to be in Obama’s “top 5 percent,” a family must earn at least $150,000—from all income sources combined. Putting aside that this is well under the $250,000 that Obama says he will be raising taxes on, this is hardly a figure that most Americans would consider “rich.”
It might surprise many to learn that this “top 5 percent” is paying a higher and higher percentage of all income taxes. Back in 2000, the last year of the Clinton Administration, these households were paying 56 percent of all income taxes. In 2005, the latest year for which the IRS has data, they were paying nearly 60 percent of all income taxes. So after tax rates on small businesses and investors were dropped, the tax code became more progressive, not less. There’s no “problem” to fix.
What about the “richest of the rich,” the top 1 percent? These families make at least $365,000 per year. In 2000, they paid 37 percent of all income taxes. That number today is nearly 40 percent. So even the richest households are paying a higher amount of all income taxes then they were before the tax cuts of the Bush era.
Demonizing Investors and Entrepreneurs
OBAMA: “…the rest of us can’t afford to demonize every investor or entrepreneur who seeks to make a profit. That drive is what has always fueled our prosperity…”
FACT: This is 100% true, so what is it doing in a myth/fact? The problem is, the Obama budget doesn’t square with the Obama rhetoric. His budget calls for massive tax increases on investors. The capital gains and dividends tax rate will rise from 15 percent to 20 percent. The death tax will go from dead to 45 percent overnight. The top tax rate on small businesses will rise from 37.9 percent to 42.5 percent, and that’s before his promised Social Security tax hike.
If that’s not using the tax code to demonize investors and entrepreneurs, what is?
Is the Deficit the Issue, or Is It Spending?
OBAMA: “(Questioner) Do you worry that your daughters…will be inheriting an even bigger fiscal mess if the spending goes out of control?” “(Obama) Of course I do, which is why we’re doing everything we can to reduce that deficit.”
FACT: Obama is focusing on the wrong target. The questioner asked, correctly, if he was okay passing along a spending budget as big as Obama is proposing to his daughters. Obama ignored the fact that his budget grows the size of government to levels not seen since World War II. Instead, he focuses on deficits, which is an uninteresting number you get by subtracting one interesting number (spending) from another (taxes). A balanced budget won’t help Obama’s daughters if they are forced to pay taxes to support a government 50% bigger than the one their father inherited.
Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: TAXES, POLITICS, CONGRESS, SPENDING, OBAMA, BUDGET
Related Articles
Obama Proposes Over $220 Billion in New Energy Taxes - Tuesday, February 9, 2010 11:47 AM
Colorado Senate Debates "Dirty Dozen" Tax Package - Monday, February 8, 2010 2:36 PM
More Job Creation By The Federal Government - Monday, February 8, 2010 9:30 AM
Van Taylor, candidate for Texas State House, Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge - Saturday, February 6, 2010 5:35 PM
The Obama Budget - Friday, February 5, 2010 5:42 PM












Add a Comment