- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
- Washington Welcomes Cost of Government Day (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
- Government Workers' Pensions are Underfunded by $3 Trillion
Monday, August 23, 2010
- Fourteen Ways to Reduce Government Spending
- FCC Report on Broadband Performance: A Scare Tactic
- Sen. Al Franken Doesn’t Understand Wireless Networks...or the First Amendment
Friday, August 20, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 19, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
New York, Cigarettes, and the Unintended Consequences
From Robert Clemmer on Monday, January 11, 2010 4:42 PMIn his State of the State address, New York’s Governor Paterson proposed raising the already high $2.75 per pack excise tax on cigarettes. When the state excise tax is combined with local and federal taxes, a pack of cigarettes can cost almost $10, leaving New York with the most expensive cigarettes in the country.
But aren’t high cigarette taxes great? Don’t they bring in more revenue? The idea that raising already high excise taxes to bring in more revenue is ignores a fundamental principle of economics: raising the price of something will always lower the demand of the good. Arkansas, Maryland, New Jersey, and Chicago have all raised cigarette taxes only to have their tax blow up in their face as revenue fails to meet projections.
Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: TAXES, TOBACCO, TOLDYOUSO, NewYork














Comments
Suggest looking up another unintended consequence. A study I heard about talked about how taxes have basically done all they can to dissuade people from smoking (the nominal reason for the tax). The wealthy have stopped smoking while the poor continue to spend more and more money on expensive cigarettes. Find the study Mr. Clemmer.
>> James Bonney Wednesday, January 13, 2010 9:44 AM Report Comment
actually there is this study which suggests that tax increases don't do squat when it comes to stopping smoking. http://www.acda-aqda.ca/HEC_MTL_TAX_STUDY_-_EN_final_vers.pdf
>> Algernon Sydney Thursday, January 14, 2010 11:21 AM Report Comment
Actually, if you go back to '70's when NY did the same thing, those who had cars and who wanted to make a quick buck, went to North/South Carolina/Virginia and bought up all the cigs that money could buy. Sold on the streets of NYC brought in a nice profit. Studies and other intellectual parodies don't mean squat. A lot of us made big bucks; the state of NY and the city lost millions of dollars in revenue. Stop reading studies by the armchair bound metrosexuals and get out on the street to find out what's going on.
>> El Gordo Sunday, January 17, 2010 12:32 AM Report Comment
Actually, if you go back to '70's when NY did the same thing, those who had cars and who wanted to make a quick buck, went to North/South Carolina/Virginia and bought up all the cigs that money could buy. Sold on the streets of NYC brought in a nice profit. Studies and other intellectual parodies don't mean squat. A lot of us made big bucks; the state of NY and the city lost millions of dollars in revenue. Stop reading studies by the armchair bound metrosexuals and get out on the street to find out what's going on.
>> El Gordo Sunday, January 17, 2010 12:35 AM Report Comment