Tax Reform ATR believes that all consumed income should be taxed one time, at one low and flat rate. Link
Groups who advocated for the IRS to prepare tax returns sure look foolish these days: http://t.co/oKvpIofu7Y
taxreformer
"We don't need the federal government mandating additional taxes..." -@MarshaBlackburn on MFA: http://t.co/lAuLJtr5t3 #NoNetTax
taxreformer
Health insurers and businesses are already feeling the iron-clad grip of regulations in #Obamacare: http://t.co/J6dfnKqFYZ
taxreformer
Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell Signs Largest Tax Hike in Virginia History into Law http://t.co/Qd6KOFfaPv
taxreformer
Under #Obamacare, mothers have had a tougher time purchasing non-prescription, over-the-counter medicine: http://t.co/dJuaGAT9LE
taxreformer
9 out of 20 #Obamacare tax hikes have not even been implemented yet: http://t.co/opFkyf1guJ
taxreformer
.@GroverNorquist on MFA: "[The Senate] didn't ask all of the questions that needed to be asked": http://t.co/wXfkIR2Ca9 #NoNetTax
taxreformer
"When architects of #Obamacare are worried about it creating a trainwreck, you know something's gone terribly wrong": http://t.co/J6dfnKqFYZ
taxreformer
Conservative and Free Market Groups Applaud Move to Delay a Vote on Gina McCarthy: http://t.co/lNQYmJAB12 #EPA
taxreformer
The #Obamacare train wreck will derail the American economy: http://t.co/opFkyf1guJ
taxreformer
There’s a new coalition that’s been formed to advocate for corporate income tax reform (lower the rates, broaden the base) called the RATE Coalition. Provided that this is done in (at worst) a tax revenue-neutral way, this is a good thing—a very good thing. But the question remains—what corporate tax rate is low enough to justify the tax reform endeavor?
The United States has the highest statutory income tax rate in the developed world. According to the OECD, the U.S. has a marginal corporate tax rate of 39.2% (including state corporate tax rates, which must be done to compare apples to apples across countries). This ranks us just barely ahead of Japan at 39.5%
| U.S. corporate rate | 39.2% |
| OECD average | 25.5% |
| OECD average ex-U.S. | 25% |
| European average | 24% |
It’s clear that the goal should be to beat or at least match the average of our competitors, which is about 25%. That’s why so many running for office and campaigning for president run on this level. But it’s not enough.
The OECD says that U.S. states impose an average corporate tax rate of 6.4%. When integrated with a 25% corporate income tax rate, the U.S. integrated rate would still be at 29.8%, still not beating countries like Ireland, Greece, Switzerland, South Korea, the United Kingdom, Italy, and Canada. We would barely beat or achieve parity with Germany. Among our major trade partners, we would only be ahead of France and Japan. When considering that most or all corporate tax deductions, credits, deferrals, etc. would be lost in the process, this hardly seems worth it.
That’s why “20 is the new 25.” If the federal rate was reduced to 20%, the integrated federal-state rate would be 25.1%--right where we need to be for competitiveness. This would also allow more corporate sectors to be “winners” in corporate tax reform, since there are relatively-few companies with average effective integrated rates consistently below 25 percent.
The bottom line is that revenue-neutral corporate income tax reform is probably not worth doing for simply a 25% federal rate. Other nations have continued to cut their rate (in 2001, for example, the OECD average rate was 31.6%), and our tax reform goal has to change to keep up.
What do you think? Would a corporate rate of 25% be low enough to make American companies competitive again?
To follow Ryan Ellis's RSS feed click here. To follow them on Twitter, their handle is @ryanlellis