Taxpayer Protection Pledge
ATR's Congressional Ratings
An American Agenda: Vote for Your Priorities
Invite Grover Norquist to Speak at Your School or Event
Welcome to Pacific Rim Policy Exchange 2010
INDEX

How "Net Neutrality" Will Encourage Intellectual Property Theft

From Tim Andrews on Tuesday, December 8, 2009 11:41 AM
Add to Reddit Add to Stumbleupon Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Twitter

Last week, the Songwriters Guild of America testified before the New York City Council, expressing their staunch opposition for “Net Neutrality”, as proposed by the FCC. Under the proposed rules, "net neutrality would"  create a legal safe harbor for pirates to continue to loot intellectual property, primarily by discouraging network operators from taking actions to prevent such misconduct. The SGA testified:

The FCC is proposing to enshrine forever rules governing the Internet that are responsible for this devastation to the songwriter community. While these rules require that all lawful uses be treated “in a non-discriminatory manner,” they ignore whether or not the usage is unlawful. The result is the property created and owned by songwriters like me is discriminated against. This is anything but neutral.”
The Songwriters Guild of America has previously stated that:
“The greatest risk of harm to consumers comes from regulatory and legislative proposals to prevent responsible ISPs from managing their networks. At the moment, the free market is the best weapon we have to combating Internet piracy. Technology created the illegal file sharing monster, but more technology can detect and deter those practices that are illegal. In other words, we must fight technology with technology. Unfortunately, the current net neutrality regulatory proposals would smother this nascent technological counter-attack against Internet piracy.
 
The songwriting profession right now is like a person drowning in the quicksand of digital piracy. Of those whose heads remain above the surface, many are up to their armpits. There is a chance that some new technology will be the rope thrown to us before it is too late. But companies and entrepreneurs need an economic incentive to develop those anti-piracy technologies. Regulations restricting the ability of ISPs to manage their networks would discourage the development of these vital technologies and would eliminate the last bit of hope that songwriters have to survive the digital onslaught.
So support America’s songwriters, and oppose net neutrality!

Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: TELECOM, Federal

Comments

I definitely oppose net neutrality. Not good for music lovers or the songwriter. If you have a telent, then you should be able to sell it without interference from Big Brother. If we don't stop Obama, we'll have nothing left including the internet. Cell phones will go, too. We need to fight this out of control Congress.
>> Nancy Lassiter Thursday, December 10, 2009 11:55 AM Report Comment

This is the one of the most ignorant views I've run across in a long time. You truly don't understand the concept of net neutrality if you think that is in any way like "big brother". Net Neutrality is exactly the opposite of big brother. Net Neutrality does NOT provide safe harbors for people who are engaged in copyright infringement. It protects law abiding citizens like me from being spied on and allowing me to access the internet in the way it was intended...not how Comcast thinks it should be.
>> Allan Thursday, December 17, 2009 1:51 PM Report Comment

this is the worst piece of tripe i have ever read. does the sga or tim andrews (i cant imagine thats his real name because no one would assign their name to such a poorly written blurb) have any idea how the internet actually works?? net neutrality would be the biggest arrow in the quiver that the small singer/songwriter may have against the domination of comcast, et al... my goodness, i really dont even know where to begin tearing this article apart. please read and study this issue before ever writing something so wrong!!
>> bill Thursday, December 17, 2009 5:21 PM Report Comment

Add a Comment



49364

Add me to the ATR Newsletter list (If you are already on the list, you will not be subscribed a second time.)
Notify me when others comment on this article.