|
Cost of Government Day (COGD)
[2005] [2004] [2003] [2002] [2001]
Title:
Lawmakers again press for sales-tax deduction
Date:
July 13, 2003
Source:
Todd J. Gillman, The Dallas Morning News
Words:
609
WASHINGTON
- The IRS received about 9 million income tax returns last
year from Texas. More than 2 million of those included itemized
deductions.
In
most states, itemizers get a bit of relief by deducting what
they pay in state income tax. But Texas is one of nine states
with no income tax. And under a 1986 federal tax reform law,
sales taxes aren't deductible.
Texas
lawmakers have tried for years to overturn that legal quirk.
The latest attempt to get sales tax deductions was tucked
into another bill - a proposal to expand the child tax credit.
House and Senate negotiators are to meet soon to work out
differences between their versions of that bill.
"Federal
tax law should not treat people differently on the basis of
state residence, nor should federal law indirectly encourage
states to impose an income tax on their citizens," Texas
Republican Sen. Kay Bailey
Hutchison
said in a letter last Thursday to Senate Finance Chairman
Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, asking him to add the deduction
during negotiations with House tax writers.
"Prior
to 1986, taxpayers were permitted to deduct all of their state
and local taxes paid when computing their federal tax liability.
The philosophy behind these deductions is simple: people should
not have to pay taxes on their taxes. Unfortunately, the deduction
for state and local sales tax was eliminated in the 1986 tax
reform legislation. This discriminates against taxpayers in
states that rely on sales taxes rather than income taxes for
revenue," Ms. Hutchison said.
She
cited estimates from the Texas comptroller that if Texans
could deduct what they pay in state and local sales taxes,
they could keep more than $700 million.
Sen.
Grassley has been noncommittal. But on the House side, the
effort has at least one key ally, Majority Leader Tom DeLay,
R-Sugar Land.
This
month, Mr. DeLay endorsed a proposal to let federal taxpayers
deduct either state sales taxes or state income tax payments.
"The
federal government shouldn't discriminate against people because
of where they live," Mr. DeLay said. "It's not fair
that millions of Americans are being denied millions of dollars
simply because their states can function without an income
tax."
U.S.
Rep. Kevin Brady, R-The Woodlands, has championed the issue
for years as a member of the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee.
A
bill he filed in February to allow deductibility of sales
tax has 77 co-sponsors, including virtually everyone in Texas'
32-member House delegation. Most of the co-signers come from
states without an income tax - Texas, Florida, Nevada, South
Dakota, Tennessee, Washington and Wyoming.
Backers
say lower-income households would benefit most, because the
sales tax is generally considered to be a "regressive"
tax, meaning the smaller the income, the bigger its relative
bite.
By
coincidence, Friday was "Cost of Government" day,
the day that - according to anti-tax group Americans for Tax
Reform marked the point at which the average worker has earned
enough to pay his or her share of running federal, state and
local government, and complying with various government regulations.
Mr.
Brady hosted a Capitol Hill event marking the day.
"It
is absolutely outrageous that Americans must work over six
months for the government before they can start to earn money
for their own families," Mr. Brady said. "Excessive
government spending burdens working Americans and slows the
economy."
For
conservatives, the event was particularly somber. According
to Americans for Tax Reform calculations, despite having a
Republican in the White House, Cost of Government day continues
to get pushed later and later each year and is now later than
it has been since 1993, during President Bill Clinton's first
year in office.
-30-
|