INDEX
- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
- Washington Welcomes Cost of Government Day (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
- Government Workers' Pensions are Underfunded by $3 Trillion
Monday, August 23, 2010
- Fourteen Ways to Reduce Government Spending
- FCC Report on Broadband Performance: A Scare Tactic
- Sen. Al Franken Doesn’t Understand Wireless Networks...or the First Amendment
Friday, August 20, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 19, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
Monday: House Mark-up of $700+ Billion Waxman-Markey Energy Bill
From Brian M Johnson on Monday, May 18, 2009 2:46 PMThis week, the House Energy Committee will begin mark-up of the Waxman-Markey energy proposal with over $600 billion dollars in additional, new taxes that every American family will have to pay.
ATR urges you to click the banner above to send a letter to your Representative to tell them to oppose this bill.
What does the Waxman-Markey Bill propose?
- The Markey-Waxman “Cap-and-trade” program imposes a tax on producers’ carbon emissions that will have devastating economic effects.
- The Heritage Center for Data Analysis projected that in 2016 the Cap-and-trade program will cost the loss of 200,000 to 900,000 American jobs.
- ATR strongly opposes Cap-and-Trade because it is the largest tax increase since the proposal of income tax and will cost the average American household an extra $1,600 annually.
- The Markey-Waxman Federal Renewable Electricity Standard is a mandate requiring electric providers to derive a certain amount of their production from renewable resources.
- From 2012- 2015, the annual percentage of renewable resources providers must use will be 6% to 8.5%; 2016- 2020: 11% to 17.5%; 2021- 2024: 17.5% to 23%; 2025 to 2039: 25%.
- The high costs this mandate inflicts on providers will be passed onto their customers, drastically raising energy prices
- The bill’s mandated increase of Corporate Average Fuel economy (CAFE) for vehicles increases costs and diminishing consumer choices.
- CAFE forces automakers to produce smaller and lighter cars. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), estimated that these lighter cars will increase American traffic fatalities by almost 40,000.
- ATR strongly opposes this standard because it will cost both lives and money. CAFE will cost American drivers more than $6.71 billion between 2010 and 2011.
Click here for a PDF of this document.
Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: TAXES, ENERGY, POLITICS, CONGRESS, REGULATIONS














.jpg)
Comments
I understand that the Congress is taking advantage of our information and governmental overload and trying to pass Bills that will tax us beyond belief. They are trying to use the Shock treatment Taxation method and hit us on all sides so some of the taxes hit and become law. We must become more involved in our own destiny - do not let the government do your thinking for you. You can help yourself - you do not need more government intervention.
>> Steve Nosich Monday, May 18, 2009 11:38 AM Report Comment
I agree with Steve. This is a HUGE financial burden to place on Americans. Additionally, I don't want the government chosing what types of lightbulbs I use and cars I drive. This is outrageous.
>> Gia J. Monday, May 18, 2009 11:56 AM Report Comment
Before we increase the cost of energy with cap-and-trade, I believe it's imperative that the United States establishes a non-political, scientific commission to review all facts and evidence surrounding global warming. For the past 20 years I believed global warming was caused by CO2. Now, after many months of research, I'm not so sure. It's looking more and more to be a natural phenomenon to me. My interest in energy policy is so great I launched www.energyplanusa.com where I take a common sense look at global warming and energy policy.
>> Rmoen Monday, May 18, 2009 2:07 PM Report Comment
Thank you all for your comments. Please do not forget to click the banner or the large graphic to send a letter to your Congressman, and pass along to your friends, to oppose this bill.
>> Brian M Johnson Monday, May 18, 2009 2:39 PM Report Comment
Maybe Heritage has answered this, but if the carbon credits are being given away instead of auctioned (meaning the government gets no revenue, or at least not much), where is the $1600 per family going?
>> TheDude Friday, May 22, 2009 6:13 PM Report Comment