Tax Reform ATR believes that all consumed income should be taxed one time, at one low and flat rate. Link
In new @DailyCaller op-ed, @GroverNorquist urges Congress to question IRS agents involved in this scandal: http://t.co/M0gV2GpQ9G
taxreformer
Gov. Bob McDonnell Signs Largest Tax Hike in Virginia History into Law: http://t.co/iENksi7uQi
taxreformer
IRS tax return preparation invites a conflict of interest: http://t.co/oKvpIofu7Y
taxreformer
These destructive #Obamacare tax hikes will soon be implemented: http://t.co/opFkyf1guJ
taxreformer
"Saying the Marketplace Fairness Act is fair is like saying the Affordable Care Act makes health care affordable" -@MarshaBlackburn
taxreformer
"I can't believe #Obamacare led to higher health care costs," said no economist ever: http://t.co/J6dfnKqFYZ
taxreformer
#Obamacare's 10% tanning tax hits salon owners and customers, most of which are women: http://t.co/dJuaGAT9LE
taxreformer
Groups who advocated for the IRS to prepare tax returns sure look foolish these days: http://t.co/oKvpIofu7Y
taxreformer
"We don't need the federal government mandating additional taxes..." -@MarshaBlackburn on MFA: http://t.co/lAuLJtr5t3 #NoNetTax
taxreformer
Health insurers and businesses are already feeling the iron-clad grip of regulations in #Obamacare: http://t.co/J6dfnKqFYZ
taxreformer
Christina Romer, Chair of President Obama’s Council of Economic Advisors, testified today to the House Committee on the Budget about the economic benefits of health care reform “done right”. If we can slow the growth of health care spending, she explained, we’ll spend less on health care.
Well, duh.
Ranking committee member Paul Ryan (WI - 1) was apparently confused that President Obama’s Council of Economic Advisors needed a 51 page report to reach such an obvious conclusion. He asked Ms. Romer why she would give such a cheerful report without discussing the “positive” effects of a single specific health care proposal. We think we know the answer, Congressman Ryan.
The actual plans that Democrats have proposed fail to significantly reduce spending. Most actually increase it! The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office has predicted that “Comparative Effectiveness Research” – one of the Obama administration’s favorite panaceas – may actually increase federal spending by $1.1 billion over the next 10 years. Perhaps the CBO missed Obama’s wink when he promised not to ration federal medical care?
Meanwhile, the CBO estimates that leading health care reform proposals like Sen. Ted Kennedy’s “Affordable Health Choices Act” will cost the government at least $1 trillion over the next 10 years. This is a massive subsidy to the health care lobby and does nothing to “bend the curve” of health care spending. Or at least, it does nothing to bend it downward. Perhaps in her next statement to Congress, Ms. Romer should give a somewhat more relevant presentation on the costs of health care reform done wrong. If we subsidize health care spending, we’ll spend more on health care. Duh!