- Flush With Union Cash, DC Mayoral Candidate Vincent Gray Looks to Roll Back DC School Reform
Sunday, September 5, 2010
- Maryland Ranks as 47th State to Celebrate COGD (CFA Site »)
Saturday, September 4, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 3, 2010
- Dina Titus Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge is Thoroughly Misleading
-
120 Days to Go Until the
Largest Tax Hikes in History - Government vs. Private Control and "Balkanization" of the Internet
-
Get 'Em While They're Hot:
Medicine Cabinet Tax Hits in 120 Days
Friday, September 3, 2010
- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
Monday, August 23, 2010
Legislation Introduced to Put Ronald Reagan on the $50 Bill
From Nathan Pick on Friday, March 5, 2010 6:15 PM
Since 1913, Americans have seen the portrait of former General and President Ulysses S. Grant on the front of the $50 bill. However, on March 2nd, Congressman Patrick McHenry (NC-10) announced the introduction of H.R. 4705, a bill that would rework the design of the $50 bill to add Ronald Reagan's face. To read more about Congressman McHenry's bill, click here.
The Ronald Reagan Legacy Project is supportive of this effort that would add Reagan to our currency. To see RRLP's press release supporting Congressman McHenry's bill, click here.
"Having President Reagan's image on the $50 bill will keep Ronald Reagan's memory and achievements fresh for generations to come." -Grover Norquist
If you would like to join RRLP in supporting the placement of Reagan's picture on the $50 bill, please consider contacting your Member of Congress and asking them to co-sponsor and vote for H.R. 4705.
Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: REAGANLEGACYPROJECT, Federal














Comments
I think it would be great to have a modern-day President on our currency!
>> Caitlin Monday, March 8, 2010 9:35 AM Report Comment
I agree with Caitlin. When you file for bankruptcy they should have obama's photo on the forms.
>> bgall Monday, March 8, 2010 2:54 PM Report Comment
I love how ATR, a supposed small government group, constantly supports spending government money to rename everything after Ronald Reagan. How much did it cost WMATA in D.C. to rename the airport after Reagan? Quite a bit. But the second government would raise taxes to finance such a project, you'd scream "pledge violator." ATR is the epitome of hypocrisy. By the way, I hear UPS is wanting to impose more regulations on FedEx...better go sellout to them. Oh wait, it's FedEx that's willing to pay more. Better go to them. No wait...UPS. Let the bidding begin. Kind of like using taxpayer dollars to build a Jefferson Memorial, something Jefferson's principles would be opposed to.
>> question Monday, March 8, 2010 3:46 PM Report Comment
I don't think it's going to really cost anything to put Reagan on the $50. It's just a matter of changing the print. Then again since the government is in charge it might end up costing a bunch-load. And out of all things the government does, renaming something doesn't cost as much as the million other things that our government is wasting our money on. I agree though about the jefferson monument though. Should never have been funded by taxpayers
>> Joseph Steel Monday, March 8, 2010 4:48 PM Report Comment
Consider the government currently: It is expansive and invasive. We contribute much of our income to it. In doing so, we pay for all of the pork and waste of bureaucracy. Government workers are notorious for downtime and massive inefficiencies. Essentially, we have many people doing the jobs of a few. This is why I am against raising taxes. When government spending is efficient, effective, and uninvasive perhaps cutting spending will be a bad idea. Until then, I would argue the minimal work require to name things in honor of Reagan requires no tax hikes. Let's actually put our public servants to work and not let them feast on our tax dollars.
>> bgall Monday, March 8, 2010 5:26 PM Report Comment