Taxpayer Protection Pledge
ATR's Congressional Ratings
An American Agenda: Vote for Your Priorities
Invite Grover Norquist to Speak at Your School or Event
Welcome to Pacific Rim Policy Exchange 2010
INDEX

AFL-CIO's Tax on Your 401(k)

From Benjamin Pacini on Tuesday, September 1, 2009 3:51 PM
Add to Reddit Add to Stumbleupon Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Twitter

This information originally appeared at www.americanshareholders.org

The Hill is reporting that “The nation’s largest labor union and some allied Democrats are pushing a new tax that would hit big investment firms such as Goldman Sachs.” Specifically, they are suggesting a tax on every stock trade, which could end up taking between $50 and $100 billion a year. 

The article puts it well: Congress “would like to take a bite out of Goldman’s profits.” The current Congress has found one more clever way to punish success—a tax on those who have invested in the stock market: America’s future.  Congress would do well to learn that the following things are not evil: successful companies, shareholders, and profits. 

This is a tax on your 401(k).  Every shareholder (including owners of mutual funds) will be paying a tax for trying to invest money back into the economy.  That is, instead of rewarding those who decide to save (and who, therefore, decide to invest in America’s future through the stock market) we are punishing them.  The cost of this tax will directly lower the returns on your 401(k).

Now, the article also goes on to say that there are good reasons for this: it will prevent financial speculation.  There is, of course, a simpler free-market solution: don’t subsidize speculators’ mistakes with ridiculous bailouts.  If people make foolish decisions, allow them to learn from them.  Let people gamble if they want to.  When they lose, they—with any luck—will stop gambling.  And if they don’t, they are only losing their own money.

The article also goes to show the brilliance of the economic minds in government today: “There is also a growing realization among Obama administration officials and lawmakers that tax increases may be necessary to curb the ballooning federal deficit.”  The government has been increasing spending without thinking of the consequences, and now, instead of cutting programs to balance the budget, they are finding new, creative ways to take our money.  The way to balance the budget is to stop spending.

Congress ought to spend its innovative powers on limiting government and making it run more efficiently—not on finding new ways to take our money.
 

Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: TAXES, Federal

Comments

Even though they'll take the roof from over your head and annihilate your IRA, corporations are on your side. We should be nice to them. Some day when your a big rich guy won't you want the little people to have your back? It's unions who are the real enemy. Listen to yourselves. No wonder the middle-class is disappearing. Idiots.
>> Hilary Thursday, September 3, 2009 8:37 PM Report Comment

Do the geniuses in Congress never learn? The investment community is one of the only ways the average worker can save for his future. Now these people want to tax that. Is there no one who will stand up in those hallowed halls and defend the average guy and gal? What happens when the tax the rich crowd decides to single a certain group out for their selected punishment? Remember the luxury tax on some cars, planes, and boats during the Clinton Era? All it did was put some Americans out of work. The rich just altered their buying to outside the country and were not affected at all. To quote the song by Peter, Paul,and Mary...'when will they ever learn'
>> Fredmm Wednesday, September 9, 2009 9:23 AM Report Comment

Add a Comment



33425

Add me to the ATR Newsletter list (If you are already on the list, you will not be subscribed a second time.)
Notify me when others comment on this article.