ATR Supports H.R. 3167, the “Tax Administration Integrity Act”

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Alexander Hendrie on Thursday, July 30th, 2015, 5:06 PM PERMALINK

Congressman John Katko (R-N.Y.) recently introduced H.R. 3167, theTax Administration Integrity Act. This important legislation would prevent the IRS from using outsourced contractors for any work that puts these contractors in contact with confidential taxpayer information. ATR supports this legislation and urges all members of the Congress to vote for and otherwise support it.

In recent years, public trust in the IRS has plummeted because of revelations of the agency’s inappropriate targeting of conservative nonprofits. Unfortunately, this is just one of many transgressions the agency has been involved in. The IRS has also contracted outside organizations for work involving the personal tax information of organizations and individuals. In fact, earlier this year the agency hired a $1,000 an hour trial law firm to perform an audit, a highly unusual decision that prompted the ire of Congress.

The Tax Administration Integrity Act would put a stop to this by explicitly forbidding the agency from hiring outside contractors for any work involving confidential taxpayer information. The IRS already has 40,000 employees dedicated to enforcement efforts and has the ability to turn over any case to the IRS office of Chief Counsel or Department of Justice attorneys, both of which have sufficient legal expertise to handle any examination or audit. Put simply, there is no reason the IRS needs to waste finite taxpayer resources on an elite law firm.

Given the proven inability of the IRS to act in a responsible way, it is clear that Congress needs to tighten its oversight over the out of control agency. This legislation is a good step in this direction and will stop the agency unnecessarily putting taxpayer information at risk. ATR endorses the Tax Administration Integrity Act and urges all members of Congress to support this important legislation.

Photo Credit: 

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Top Comments

Networks Refuse to Report on Latest IRS Scandal Revelations

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Geoffrey Dickens on Thursday, July 30th, 2015, 3:45 PM PERMALINK

Editor's Note: This article was originally posted on NewsBusters and was republished here with permission.

  • When Lois Lerner found out that instant messaging e-mails were not automatically archived she responded: “Perfect.” 
  • The IRS failed to search 5 of the 6 possible sources of electronic media for Lerner’s emails.
  • House GOP chairman Jason Chaffetz called for removal of IRS Commissioner John Koskinen because he repeatedly “obstructed” congressional investigations.

None of these three stunning IRS scandal developments, that have unfolded this week, have yet to be reported on by any of the Big Three network evening or morning shows. 

The cover-up behind the IRS targeting scandal continues to unravel, despite President Barack Obama’s protest to The Daily Show’s Jon Stewart last week that “the truth of the matter is there was not some big conspiracy.” This week’s revelations provided the perfect opportunity to catch Obama in a “gotcha” moment but so far ABC, CBS and NBC have reacted with total silence. 

The following is a rundown of the IRS targeting scandal developments this week that, so far, the networks have refused to cover: 

On Monday, AP’s Stephen Ohlemacher reported on Chaffetz’s call for Koskinen’s job in his July 27 article: 

The Republican chairman of a powerful House committee called for the removal of the IRS commissioner Monday, saying he has obstructed congressional investigations into the treatment of conservative groups.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, sent a letter Monday to President Barack Obama, asking him to remove IRS Commissioner John Koskinen. Chaffetz is chairman of the House Oversight Committee, which has been investigating the IRS for more than two years.

"Throughout his tenure, Commissioner Koskinen obstructed these congressional investigations," Chaffetz wrote in a letter that was also signed by 20 other Republicans on the Oversight Committee. "His obstruction takes the form of failure to comply with a congressional subpoena, failure to testify truthfully and failure to preserve and produce up to 24,000 emails relevant to the investigation."

Chaffetz also raised the possibility of impeaching Koskinen or voting to hold him in contempt of Congress. But when pressed, Chaffetz was noncommittal, saying those were tools available to Congress if the White House does not act.

On Tuesday, Americans for Tax Reform’s Alexander Hendrie posted the following on Lerner’s reaction to the IRS’s use of instant messaging: 

The IRS used a “wholly separate” instant messaging system that automatically deleted office communications, according to documentation released by the House Oversight Committee on Monday. The system appears to have been purposefully used by agency officials responsible for the targeting of conservative non-profits, in order to evade public scrutiny.

The system, known as “Office Communication Server” or OCS was used by IRS officials, including many in the Exempt Organizations (EO) Unit, which was headed by Lois Lerner.

As the Oversight Committee report states, the instant messaging system did not archive any communications, so it is not possible to know what employees of the EO unit discussed on it.

However, in an email uncovered by the Committee Lerner warns her colleagues about evading Congressional oversight:

“I was cautioning folks about email and how we have had several occasions where Congress has asked for emails and there has been an electronic search for responsive emails – so we need to be cautious about what we say in emails.”

Lerner then asks whether OCS is automatically archived. When informed it was not, Lerner responded “Perfect.”

While it is possible to set the instant messaging system to automatically archive messages, the IRS chose not to do so, according to one employee interviewed by the Committee. The fact that the agency chose not to archive messages raises questions about the true purpose of OCS and what discussions took place.

Needless to say, the apparent use of OCS to evade Congressional oversight once again shows that the IRS does not want the American people to learn the truth about the Lois Lerner targeting scandal. 

On Tuesday, Hendrie also filed this July 28 post on the IRS’s less than exhaustive search for missing e-mails: 

The IRS failed to search five of six possible sources of electronic media for Lois Lerner’s emails, according to a documentation released by the House Oversight Committee on Monday.

Over the course of investigations into the Lois Lerner targeting scandal, Commissioner John Koskinen repeatedly assured Congress that he would provide all of Lois Lerner’s emails. But based on testimony from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA), this did not occur. The agency’s ineptness -- or corruption -- resulted in 24,000 Lerner emails being lost when they were “accidently” destroyed. 

According to TIGTA official Timothy Camus, the IRS had six possible sources to search for Lois Lerner’s emails:

“The hard drive would have been a source, Blackberry source, backup tapes a source, the backup tapes for the server drives and then finally the loaner lap tops.”

When asked how many of these sources the IRS searched, Camus says was unable to say for certain whether the IRS had searched any, although he acknowledged it appears the agency did search Lerner’s hard drive:

“We’re not aware that they searched any one in particular. They did – it appears they did look into initially whether or not the hard drive had been destroyed, but they didn’t go much further than that.”

The agency’s refusal to conduct due diligence in its search for Lerner’s emails meant that 1,000 emails were not found until TIGTA searched backup tapes. When asked why the IRS did not give these emails to Congress, Camus said it was because the agency never looked for them in the first place:

“To the best we can determine through the investigation, they just simply didn’t look for those emails.”

Commissioner Koskinen stated that the IRS took “extraordinary efforts” to recover any emails, but this is clearly not the case. Years after the investigations into the Lois Lerner targeting scandal began, the agency’s unprecedented obstruction has meant Americans are no closer to the truth.

Photo Credit: 
Brookings Institution

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Top Comments


President Obama is complicit in this cover up. He is allowing it to take place, after he benefited from the IRS targeting of conservative groups. All along he could have compelled Koskinen and Lerner to turn over emails and come clean (instead Lerner twice plead the 5th). The targeting helped suppress grass roots political opposition to Obama's candidacy leading up to the 2012 election. He is therefore overseeing and confining illegal and corrupt activity, the use of the government's most powerful and feared agency to suppress his political opposition. Obama is therefore not a legitimate president—he, or those working for him, used illegal methods to get him re elected, and he now shields those criminals from prosecution and investigation. Americans therefore need not, and perhaps should not, accord to Barack Obama the sense of legitimacy that is due a president. His presidency is Nixonian and worse. With the help of his Justice Department, he is running a criminal presidency.


Faults and all, Richard Milhouse Nixon still loved this country. Barack Hussein Obama clearly wants to burn America to the ground. To say that his 'presidency' is "Nixonian" commits a grave insult to RMN - faults and all.


El Dorko in the White House is a joke, and he should be arrested and put in prison. He is a disgrace to be even called a President, let alone a President for the USA. So sad . He is a waste of a human being.

Obama's Birthday Wish List: Job Losses and Increased Poverty Rates

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Justin Sykes on Thursday, July 30th, 2015, 3:24 PM PERMALINK

Next week the Obama Administration and EPA will release the final version of the Clean Power Plan (CPP). In support of the rule, the President and EPA routinely cite to the benefits the CPP’s carbon emissions regulations will have on the American public and environment.

Yet such “benefits” are tenuous at best, largely based on questionable science and seldom founded in reality. The EPA’s own projections show the rule would amount to a 0.02 degrees Celsius difference in world temperatures by 2100 and sea level reduction equivalent to the thickness of three sheets of paper. 

However in stark contrast, the impact the President’s carbon regulations will have on Americans, especially the country’s most vulnerable are all too real. Consensus shows and the EPA has even agreed that the carbon regulations will lead to higher energy rates across the nation. Indeed double-digit increases are expected in over 40 states. 

While the President and his Capitol Hill cronies may not be impacted by rate increases, many of the countries most vulnerable will not be so lucky. A recent report by the National Black Chamber of Commerce found that the President’s carbon regulations could prove devastating for minority communities.

The Chamber’s report looked at job losses, decreased household income and increased poverty rates due to the carbon rule. The report showed that 200,000 African-American jobs would be lost just in 2020. During that same period over 300,000 jobs would be lost in Hispanic communities. The cumulative impact by 2035 would be almost 7 million African-American jobs lost and over 12 million for Hispanics. 

Additionally, the report projected that the carbon regulations would reduce median household income for African-Americans by more than $5,000 within the next 20 years. For Hispanics the impacts would be even worse, with reductions over $7,000.

However the most troubling finding of the report was the impact on poverty rates resulting from reduced income and job losses. For African Americans the poverty rate is slated to jump by 23 percent and Hispanic poverty would grow by 26 percent.       

It appears that the Obama Administration and the EPA are more than willing to ignore such devastating impacts, all in the name of preserving the President’s legacy. In fact it is rumored the final rule may be released on President Obama’s birthday, August 4th.

Sadly, while the President is blowing out his candles next week, many of the country’s most vulnerable will be preparing for the worst. Thus on behalf of the millions of Americans soon to be teetering on the brink of poverty as a result of the Clean Power Plan…Happy Birthday Mr. President.  


Photo credit: Steve Jurvetson

Top Comments

Luke Skywalker



I'm continually astounded and sickened by the lack of action by Congress against this radical president and his minion agencies that seem to have unlimited power to invade, regulate, restrict and control every aspect, every day, of everyone's business and personal lives. I wonder if, when my children are grown, they will be allowed to even draw breath without government restriction.

Grover Norquist Simplifies Spectrum

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Timothy Wilt on Thursday, July 30th, 2015, 3:11 PM PERMALINK

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Wireless spectrum and the federal policies that surround it are complicated. For years, Congress has struggled to establish the necessary and lasting spectrum policies our nation needs to support the growth of wireless communication. Public advocates and Congressional representatives have univocally expressed concern over the government’s current approach to spectrum allocation, keeping the best and most valuable for its own agencies, without even requiring them to declare it as the valuable asset it is.

In his newest op-ed, Grover Norquist explains the value of wireless spectrum, and the pressing need for Congress to establish a plan that will allow spectrum availability to keep pace with the rapid expansion of wireless communication technologies. By 2019, the United States mobile data traffic is predicted to increase 6-fold from the 2014 levels. If commercial spectrum availability does not increase in tandem, Americans will suffer from dangerous levels of congestion and interference.

Spectrum sales are also a government cash cow. If Congress sold just 1 quarter of agency held spectrum for commercial use, it could generate up to $200 billion in pure revenue. That money could be used to reduce the debt or the tax burden on American citizens.

Norquist addresses this and more in his new article:

“Spectrum delivers our wireless communications, like broadcast television, AM/FM radio, WiFi and smartphone traffic, through the air. Our ever-increasing consumption of wireless data coupled with spectrum scarcity, makes it a cherished resource for companies that want to deliver wireless services.

The fed, of course, does not want to part ways with its gold, especially since this particular asset doesn’t have to show up on the balance sheet.

We need more spectrum to market. There are plenty of buyers. The feds need an incentive. Senator Rubio has the carrot/stick.

The National Telecommunications and Information Administration, which manages federal spectrum use, must restructure and reclaim under-used spectrum—“clean the attic”. Then let the Federal Communication Commission manage the commercial auctions—“host the yard sale”

Click Here to read the full article. 

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Top Comments

What Rand Paul's Tax Plan Would Do For You

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Emma Boone on Thursday, July 30th, 2015, 11:41 AM PERMALINK

Senator Paul has put forward a dynamic and exciting outline for tax reform. His plan would replace all current tax brackets with one flat rate of 14.5 percent. A single low income tax rate would be a great incentive to save, work, and invest for all Americans.

Tune in to hear more about Rand Paul’s tax plan, how it would help America’s economy and what his plan would do for America.


More from Americans for Tax Reform

Top Comments


You are correct. However "I see so far because I stand on the shoulders of those who came before me." Without the fair tax, without "tax simplification" we would have no chance of a "flat tax." And w/o a "flat tax" we have no chance of "no tax." A flat tax is just one more shoulder we need to get to the freedom we all want.


It's okay if it's "revenue neutral". Its' the system. Once its' in place people will act in unison and slowly bring it down.... a little by little.. Lets at least give it a chance.


How about we get their first before we say it'll never survive? I'd like to at least have the chance to see if it has a chance.

Speaker Boehner Endorses Lifting the Crude Export Ban

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Justin Sykes on Thursday, July 30th, 2015, 9:18 AM PERMALINK

Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) this week came out in support of lifting the decades old ban on the export of U.S. crude oil. 

Speaking at a press conference on Wednesday, Speaker Boehner stated, “Lifting the ban would create an estimated 1 million jobs here at home, jobs that would frankly get created in every state. It would help bring down prices at the pump for consumers, and it will be good for our allies.” 

Since the 1970's the U.S. has had a ban in place on the export of crude oil. The ban was originally enacted to protect U.S. supplies in response to decades of declining domestic production and issues in the international oil market. 

Yet in recent years the U.S. has experienced a renaissance in energy production, thanks in part to improvements in extraction and exploration methods, and it is increasingly evident the ban is no longer justified. As Speaker Boehner alluded, the economic benefits of lifting the ban would ripple throughout the economy and extend to all states, not just producers.

An overwhelming number of studies project lifting the export ban would create hundreds of thousands of jobs annually, increase household income for millions of Americans and lower domestic fuel prices. A recent study by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) stated that lifting the ban would increase the “size of the economy…employment, investment, public revenue and trade.”

The Speaker’s support finds widespread, bipartisan company with a growing number of those in Congress. On the House side Congressman Joe Barton (R-Tex.) has introduced legislation to lift the ban and Senators Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) are leading a similar effort in the Senate.

Speaker Boehner’s endorsement for lifting the ban is a productive step forward. Americans for Tax Reform encourages members of Congress to follow the Speaker’s lead in supporting an end to this outdated relic of 1970’s era policy.


Photo credit: USDA

Top Comments


American oil is a national security resource, and should not be exported. Period.

MC Slammer

Subheadline: US Chamber of Commerce against Crude Export Ban.

Tommy Rayfield

As badly as the US needs oil, why would they export a single drop?

Massachusetts Spends $224 Million to Break Workable ‘Romneycare’ Exchange

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Caroline Anderegg on Thursday, July 30th, 2015, 9:00 AM PERMALINK

When Obamacare was passed, Massachusetts served as the prototype for state exchanges, as it already had its own online insurance portal in place that had worked for years.  However, federal bureaucrats determined that the Romneycare exchange wasn’t up to par with the extensive requirements in place for the new Obamacare state exchanges, and officials began constructing a new site pitched as a massive upgrade for Bay Staters. But after $224 million in federal funds and years of development the new and “improved” exchange failed utterly and resulted in an estimated $1 billion in costs for the state.

Massachusetts contracted CGI Corp. to design the revamped site—the same major information technology consultant that was used to set up the federal health care exchange. Just like the federal exchange, Massachusetts was an abject failure.

The health connector was nearly inoperable during the first open enrollment period, and in its first three months enrolled just five percent of its target. CGI was fired from the project and a new team was brought in to start from the ground up for a second time, but CGI was still paid $52 million of its $89 million contract with the state.

Not only did the Commonwealth Connector Authority (CCA), the state agency tasked with overseeing the project, utterly fail in its first three months, they actively sought to conceal the site’s shortcomings from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Health Connector board of directors, the media and the public. Furthermore, they urged state workers to approve subpar work and attempted to cover up the site’s stagnant progress by skirting testing requirements.  When they did test a portion of the website prior to the launch, there was a 90 percent failure rate.

A new contractor was not the fresh start the CCA was hoping for, and the health connector was proven a disaster almost beyond repair.  At a board meeting in February 2014, Massachusetts Health Connector executive director Jean Yang was brought to tears at the abysmal performance of the exchange, as over 50,000 applications were piled up waiting to be manually entered into the computer system. With each application taking close to two hours to process, it would take 50 employees nearly a year to complete the backlog of applications. In the meantime, those applicants were placed on inadequate, temporary coverage in order for them to remain insured.

Massachusetts had hoped to enroll 250,000 applicants, yet their actual enrollment for the year was 31,695—a measly 13 percent of their goal. The Massachusetts disaster did not just prevent individuals form signing up to Obamacare. It also displaced over 300,000 individuals from Medicaid. In all the debacle cost an estimated $1 billion, according to the Pioneer Institute. At present the exchange has a total enrollment of 124,010, far below what officials had hoped at the outset of the project.

Unfortunately, Massachusetts is no isolated, extreme case. Oregon has also come under fire for wasting $305 million in federal grants with nothing to show for it, and countless other state exchanges remain teetering on the brink of financial collapse.

On the surface, the failure of the Massachusetts Health Connector represents willful incompetence on behalf of CCA.  But under even the slightest scrutiny the state’s execution of the exchange reeks of fraud, evidenced by their lies to both federal officials and the public about the “upgraded” site.  

Photo Credit: 
Robin Schmidt,

Top Comments


The eight scariest words ever spoken by mankind, "I'm from the government and here to help". - this should also include private sector consultants that have incestuous ties to the govt. - Toni Townes-Whitley (CGI) - school-mate of Michelle (Robinson) Obama's while at Princeton; both active members of the Association of Black Princeton Alumni.
Enough said.


as GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES keep getting richer off OUR MONEY

The Curious Case of Lois Lerner's Physically Damaged Hard Drive

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Alexander Hendrie on Thursday, July 30th, 2015, 7:15 AM PERMALINK

New documentation released by the House Oversight Committee this week again raises questions on how Lois Lerner’s hard drive was physically damaged and whether there was some kind of deliberate act to destroy data on it.

The House Oversight Committee report cites an officially transcribed interview with John Minsek, senior investigative analyst with the IRS Criminal Investigations (CI) unit. Minsek examined the Lerner hard drive in 2011. In the transcribed interview, he notes Lerner's hard drive contained “well-defined scoring creating a concentric circle in the proximity of the center of the disk.” The Oversight Committee report states:

"Using the CI unit's digital forensic facilities, Minsek opened the hard drive and conducted additional tests. Once he opened the hard drive, Minsek noticed “well-defined scoring creating a concentric circle in the proximity of the center of the disk.”

So how did the scoring get there?

Last month, testimony from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) revealed that Lois Lerner’s hard drive had “scoring on the top platter of the drive.” The testimony also noted that the IRS technician that inspected the hard drive believed that additional steps could have been taken to recover data, although this did not occur and the hard drive was later destroyed by an industrial strength AMERI-SHRED AMS-750 HD shredder.

Given these facts, it is logical to question how the "scoring" occurred and whether there was foul play involved. Here it what is known thus far:

  • According to TIGTA testimony submitted to the Oversight Committee on June 25, 2014, Lerner’s laptop stopped communicating with the IRS server on Saturday June 11, 2011, between 5:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m.
  • According to the same testimony,the laptop was likely physically located in Lerner's office the moment it stopped communicating with the server: 

"Based on consistent network reporting for more than a week, the laptop computer was likely located in Ms. Lerner’s office." 

  • On Monday June 13, 2011, Lerner reported the laptop inoperable. 
  • Lerner's laptop was initially serviced by an IRS IT staff technician and a Hewlett-Packard contractor. Of note, the HP contractor thought the hard drive crashed due to a physical impact. According to the TIGTA testimony:

“When asked about the possible cause of the hard drive failure, the HP technician opined that heat-related failures are not seen often, and based on the information provided to him, the hard drive more than likely crashed due to an impact of some sort. However, because the HP technician did not examine the hard drive as part of his work on the laptop, it could not be determined why it crashed.” 

  • As the testimony states, TIGTA was unable to determine whether anyone had entered Lois Lerner’s office during the date in question because entry logs had been destroyed after a year in keeping with the vendor's operating procedures:

“Attempts were made to determine if anyone entered Ms. Lerner’s office prior to the hard drive crash on June 11, 2011; however, the entry logs that would have recorded any entry into the building were destroyed by the building security vendor after one year of retention, or sometime in 2012. The destruction of the logs after one year falls within the vendor’s standard operating procedures.”

  • TIGTA’s testimony states that the laptop as a whole appeared undamaged. When Lerner’s laptop was first inspected by both an assigned IT specialist and Hewlett Packard contractor they both stated that “they did not note any visible damage to the laptop computer itself.”


The testimony does not speculate how the hard drive was “scored” while the computer itself remained visibly undamaged. However, given these facts it seems logical to question what -- or who -- caused the damage to the hard drive.

In August and September, the Oversight Committee is expected to release more information from the millions of reviewed documents and 50 transcribed interviews. All Americans expecting honest government hope more light will be shed on how Lerner’s hard drive mysteriously received "scoring."


See also: 

IRS Failed to Search Five of Six Locations for Lois Lerner Emails
IRS Used Instant Messaging System to Hide Internal Communications
House Oversight Committee Details Case for Removal of IRS Commissioner
Watchdog: IRS May Still Be Targeting Conservative Non-Profits


Photo Credit: 
Chris Bannister,

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Top Comments

Chuck Farley

You can always trust a liberal to lie every time. It is what they do best.


Deny, lie and smear is usually the order they go in.


So what will be done in the end to her and the IRS for the criminal behavior?

911 fellows are alive and kicking a soccer ball on their new 750,000 dollar soccer field at Gitmo and get their special Islamic meals.

Sandy Berger paid a fine of $50,000 dollars for stealing and destroying documents from the National Archives about 911.

Former POTUS and former Gov Bill Clinton pulled it out on a low level government employee and demanded personal attention then when she did not comply his staffers made her job unbearable. Illegal today as it was then.

Some make claim that punishing USA leaders as one would punish the common man and or plebes and peasants equally and the same using the exact same laws would hurt and harm the USA.

"All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others."

ATR Supports S. 1728, The “Access to Court Challenges for Exempt Status Seekers (ACCESS) Act”

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Alexander Hendrie on Wednesday, July 29th, 2015, 5:24 PM PERMALINK

Earlier this month, S. 1728, the “Access to Court Challenges for Exempt Status Seekers (ACCESS) Act” was introduced by Senator Dan Coats (R-Ind.). S. 1728 will rein in the out-of-control IRS by granting protections to social welfare groups seeking 501 (c)(4) status during the application process. ATR supports this legislation and urges all members of the Senate to vote for and support this important legislation.

Currently, the IRS has total discretion to approve or deny the application of a group seeking 501(c)(4) tax-exempt status. In light of revelations that the IRS inappropriately targeted conservative groups over several years, it is clear that this authority was abused. Conservative groups waited as long as two years for the IRS to act on their applications and faced far greater scrutiny than their liberal counterparts.

The ACCESS Act will put a stop to this by ensuring organizations seeking tax-exempt status are treated fairly regardless of political affiliation. Specifically, it gives nonprofits seeking 501(c)(4) status the ability to advocate for themselves in Tax Court if the IRS takes longer than nine months to approve their application. This process is already available to organizations applying for 501(c)(3) charity or foundation status, and so affording social welfare groups this same protection against bureaucratic obstruction should be a common-sense proposal to all. By passing the ACCESS Act, Congress will ensure social welfare groups applying for non-profit status receive fair treatment during their application process.

In the wake of the IRS targeting conservative 501 (c)(4) applicants with improper scrutiny, it is clear that stronger protections for applicants are needed. The ACCESS Act will create a fairer, more streamlined application system for non-profits and will put a stop to the IRS processing social welfare applications based on political affiliation.


Photo Credit: 
Rumble Press,

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Top Comments

Obama Carbon Regulations could leave Manatees out in the cold

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Justin Sykes on Wednesday, July 29th, 2015, 9:50 AM PERMALINK

President Obama and the EPA are expected to unveil the final version of their Clean Power Plan (CPP) next week. While criticism of the rule has centered on the economically disastrous impact the CPP’s carbon emissions regulations will have, some in Washington are crying foul for a different reason – that the regulations could leave hundreds of Florida manatees out in the cold…literally. 

It’s no secret the President’s carbon regulations will force the premature retirement of coal-fired power plants across the U.S. In fact the President seems wholly indifferent to the thousands of jobs and livelihoods he’s destroying. However what the President and EPA did not count on is that some of the power plants that will be shuttered are integral to the survival of hundreds of Florida manatees.              

The issue stems from the fact that the warm-water discharge from some Florida coal-fired power plants, such as Florida’s Big Bend Power Station, has become home to hundreds of West Indian manatees. The manatees are drawn to the warm-water discharge for a nearly six-month period in the winter.

In fact, as reported by the Washington Times, the Big Bend Power Station actually created a “Manatee Viewing Center” in 1986 with nature walks and observation platforms for visiting tourists. Thus the likely closure of such plants under the Clean Power Plan would have a profound impact on the manatee populations that rely on such sanctuaries to survive during the winter months. 

However in drafting the soon to be released Clean Power Plan, the President nor EPA took these impacts into consideration as would otherwise be required under the Endangered Species Act.

“This is troubling for the manatee, but even more disturbing is the possibility that the Obama administration would strategically disregard the law when it serves their interests or the President’s legacy,” said Julia Bell, press secretary for the House Natural Resources Committee.

The EPA has deflected charges the Agency failed to take into account the impact on certain endangered species like the Florida manatee, instead arguing the choice to close such power plants will be left to the states. However this argument holds little water given the Clean Power Plan’s compliance standards leave states with almost no “choice” but to shutter the plants.

While the outcome of this dilemma is still unclear, what is overwhelmingly clear is that nothing, not the destruction of thousands of people’s livelihoods or even the Endangered Species Act, will prevent the President from doing what he has to do to preserve his legacy.     


Photo Credit: Psyberartist

Top Comments


If you could JUST FIND a gay or transgender Manatee we could get Obama to do an executive order to protect them...or at least a federal judge to do an order to intervene for them while a study was done.

Tom Magee

I'm no fan of the regressive, de-industrilization, so called 'progressives' but these manatees are no different than birds congregating around a snack bar at the airport. Using progressive, heart strings tactics to save the industrial revolution just doesn't seem right, IMO. We need no excuses to keep our way of life going.


I say save the manatee. Not as cuddly looking as a polar bear. So won't get the press. No pictures of a shut down coal plant with manatees on the shore shivering. They are big majestic beasts, maybe we can get solar heating for their winter havens.