- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
- Washington Welcomes Cost of Government Day (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
- Government Workers' Pensions are Underfunded by $3 Trillion
Monday, August 23, 2010
- Fourteen Ways to Reduce Government Spending
- FCC Report on Broadband Performance: A Scare Tactic
- Sen. Al Franken Doesn’t Understand Wireless Networks...or the First Amendment
Friday, August 20, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 19, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
Impact of Cap-and-Trade on the Refining Sector
From Brian M Johnson on Tuesday, November 3, 2009 12:05 PMA new study by EnSys Energy illustrates the devastating impact a Cap-and-Trade national energy tax will have on the US Oil Refining industry. While the study did not look specifically at refinery closures or job loses, it is their contention that these losses would be substantial.
Increased Costs:
Increased “variable” costs will be crippling for the oil refining industry:
- In 2015 allowance costs for direct refinery emissions will be from $2.5 to $5.7 billion (2007$).
- Increase costs per barrel $0.5 to $1.2, an average increase of 20% to 50%.
- By 2030 the costs would increase to $14.8 to $32 billion. A per barrel increase of $2.7 to $7.2, which is a 100%-300% increase.
Cap-and-Trade would also increase “fixed” costs for refineries by increasing costs of construction for new equipment. This increased cost will prevent refineries from investing in new equipments and technologies.
Domestic Production Decreases; Import Increases:
As a result of increased costs rendering US companies less competitive against unrestrained countries, production from US companies would drop off while production from foreign companies increases.
- US refining throughput could plummet by as much as 25% (4.4 million barrels per day) by 2030.
- US refining throughput would reduce by 1 to 2 million barrels per day by 2015 and by 1.5 to 4.4 million barrels per day in 2030.
- This will negatively affect all US refining regions, but will hit the Gulf Coast, PAD District III hardest.
- 2030 throughput in PAD District III would fall from the 7.7 million barrel per day Baseline estimate to between 6.8 and 5.1 billion barrels per day.
- By 2030, non-US throughput would increase an estimated 900,000 to 3.3 million barrels per day.
- US imports would increase from the 2015 Baseline of 14% to between 18% and 20%.
- Imports would also increase from the 2030 Baseline of 10% to between 14% and 19%.
The offsetting imports mean that any carbon emissions that are cut from the US would be offset by increased emissions in countries with increased production. This program would have no impact on worldwide CO2, but devastate the refining industry.
Decreased Investment:
- Annual refinery investments would decrease up to $89.7 billion by 2030; an 88% decrease from the Baseline level.














Add a Comment