INDEX
- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
- Washington Welcomes Cost of Government Day (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
- Government Workers' Pensions are Underfunded by $3 Trillion
Monday, August 23, 2010
- Fourteen Ways to Reduce Government Spending
- FCC Report on Broadband Performance: A Scare Tactic
- Sen. Al Franken Doesn’t Understand Wireless Networks...or the First Amendment
Friday, August 20, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 19, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
Hollow Rhetoric on Education from Obama
From Derek Hunter on Wednesday, February 25, 2009 5:54 PMLast night President Obama said this to Congress and the American people:
But what exactly is the promise of education seems to differ based upon who you are.
If you're a kid growing up in the failing public school system of the nation's capital, that promise ran the risk of being broken before it was even made.
The Omnibus Spending Bill now working its way through Congress contains a clause designed to kill the best opportunity DC children have to escape the trappings of the lowest performing school system in the country and find refuge in charter and private schools.
It's a pilot program designed to test the results of allowing students access to private and charter schools with scholarships. And where better to test it than a place that spends more than $14,000 per student, per year, and barely graduates half its enrollees. You'd think politicians would be lining up to try something, anything new for an area that spends the most but has the worst results. But that ignores the reality of politics and unions in education.
Washington, DC is a federal city that is administered by the federal government, the federal government is controlled by Democrats, and Democrats are a wholly owned subsidiary of the unions, particularly the teachers unions. Teachers unions don't like the idea of school choice and opportunities for poor, underprivileged students to escape the system. In this game money is power, and head count is money. The more students in a school, the more money to that school. Teachers unions aren't nearly as interested in product at the end of the year as they are in the head count at the beginning.
They also aren't big fans of charter and private schools that have significantly better results while spending less money per student, mostly because those charter and private schools are non-union. Children's future be damned, union dues come first.
But don't take my word for it, I'm a right-winger that wants freedom to choose the school people want to send their kids to and allowing them the means with which to do it (diabolical in the eyes of the Left), take the word of the Washington Post.
CONGRESSIONAL Democrats want to mandate that the District's unique school voucher program be reauthorized before more federal money can be allocated for it. It is a seemingly innocuous requirement. In truth it is an ill-disguised bid to kill a program that gives some poor parents a choice regarding where their children go to school. Many of the Democrats have never liked vouchers, and it seems they won't let fairness or the interests of low-income, minority children stand in the way of their politics. But it also seems they're too ashamed -- and with good reason -- to admit to what they're doing.
Again, that the Washington Post, not the Washington Times.
Why try to sneak this past people in a huge spending bill? Because it's not popular, but school choice is. Can't let something your benefactor doesn't want continue, but when it actually benefits the people you claim to be the champion of you sure can't do it in the light of day.
I'm as cynical as they come, but even this one I found to be shocking.
You can read more about the union, er, Democrat plan here.
The real tragedy is the children who are benefitting know their government is out to take away the best opportunity they have to improve their lot in life. See the video below for some of their reactions. (NOTE: these children wrote these letters themselves.)
Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: CONGRESS, DistrictofColumbia














Comments
WHEN I SAW THESE PRECIOUS CHILDREN PRESENTING THEIR CASE TO THEIR PRESIDENT IT REALLY PULLED AT MY HEART STRINGS. THESE YOUNG BOYS & GIRLS ARE THE FUTURE OF OUR GREAT COUNTRY. MY HOPE FOR THEM, IS THAT THE PRESIDENT & CONGRESS WILL LISTEN. P.S DONT LOOSE SIGHT OF YOUR DREAMS. I HOPE YOUR PARENTS ARE AS PROUD OF YOU AS I AM (JUST AN ORDINARY CITIZEN WHO HEARS YOU AND CARES) I"LL CONTACT MY REP. & SENATORS CONCERNING YOUR PLIGHT
>> JOHN MCCALLUM Thursday, March 19, 2009 10:53 PM Report Comment