Harvard Economists:
We’re Over Spent and Over Taxed

From Benjamin Pacini on Tuesday, November 24, 2009 10:53 AM

The traditional economic thinking on stimulus is based off of the Keynesian notion that government spending and tax cuts can ‘stimulate’ an economy. This theory has been put to the test with the recent economic collapse, and the results are in: tax cuts work better than spending to stimulate an economy.

Harvard Economists Alberto Alesina and Silvia Ardagna propose in their new paper that “Fiscal stimuli based upon tax cuts are more likely to increase growth than those based upon spending increases. As for fiscal adjustments, those based upon spending cuts and no tax increases are more likely to reduce deficits and debt over GDP ratios than those based upon tax increases. In addition, adjustments on the spending side rather than on the tax side are less likely to create recessions.”

Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: TAXES, STIMULUS

Comments

"Undertaxed" ??? They are saying tax cuts are more fiscally stimulative than spending increases right? (..edit the title) I am amazed Harvard still has people like this
>> Doug Tuesday, November 24, 2009 11:22 AM Report Comment

Correction: we are overtaxed, not under-taxed. The paper indicates that increasing taxes to pay for budget shortfalls can lead to recessions, whereas decreasing spending does not. It also says that tax cuts are more stimulative than spending increases.
>> Benjamin Pacini Tuesday, November 24, 2009 11:51 AM Report Comment

Email this Page
Name
Email Address
Friends' Name
Friends' Email

Email this Page

Harvard Economists: We’re Over Spent and Over Taxed

Comments

Add a Comment

Harvard Economists:
We’re Over Spent and Over Taxed