- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
- Washington Welcomes Cost of Government Day (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
- Government Workers' Pensions are Underfunded by $3 Trillion
Monday, August 23, 2010
- Fourteen Ways to Reduce Government Spending
- FCC Report on Broadband Performance: A Scare Tactic
- Sen. Al Franken Doesn’t Understand Wireless Networks...or the First Amendment
Friday, August 20, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 19, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
Governor Tim Pawlenty: Hero of the Taxpayer
From Kelly William Cobb on Friday, May 15, 2009 11:49 AM
After the legislature proposed billions in higher taxes this year, Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty (R) announced yesterday that he will trim and balance the state's budget without raising taxes.
Earlier this week, the legislature finished passing a series of budget bills that authorized $34 billion in spending over the next year. However, in a glaring sign of fiscal irresponsibility, the legislature's budget overspends anticipated revenues by nearly $3 billion. Gov. Pawlenty, a signer of the Taxpayer Protection Pledge to oppose all tax increases, announced he would use a line item veto to balance the budget, while maintaining his commitment to veto any tax increases.
The Democratic-Farmer-Labor (DFL) led legislature has been pressing for numerous tax hikes since the beginning of the legislative session. The Senate proposed $2.2 billion in higher income taxes, while the House proposed $1.5 billion in higher taxes on resident and small business income, digital goods, cigarettes, and alcohol beverages, as well as eliminating a number of tax deductions.
Legislators recently approved a bill proposed by the Tax Omnibus Conference Committee that would raise $1 billion in higher taxes on income, alcohol beverages, and credit card companies. However, Gov. Pawlenty - maintaining his no-tax pledge - quickly vetoed the bill last week.
Below is ATR's press release commending Gov. Pawlenty or click here for a PDF version.
Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: TAXES, THEPLEDGE, Minnesota














Comments
Finally, a governor who isn't afraid to stand up to his legislature!
>> Friday, May 15, 2009 4:56 PM Report Comment
I guarantee my property taxes will be higher because of his moves - one of the first things he is hacking is local government aid. I live in a small town, and the result of the move will be an increase in taxes here - he is simply shifting the burden for his own political gain.
>> Murphy Tuesday, May 19, 2009 8:11 AM Report Comment
Pawlenty is NOT the hero of tax reform. He has not raised taxes, but he has raised fees on many things. He has also cut funding for local govt which have been forced to raise taxes for things like schools. So, while he can be all self-righteous about not raising taxes, I AM STILL PAYING MORE!! That is no hero.
>> Minnesotan Tuesday, May 19, 2009 8:21 AM Report Comment
Not to mentioned, rather than raising taxes for a temporary five window, he would rather borrow money though bonding. How is that fiscally responsible. The people who run this site need to look more closely at who they support. Is there anyone there who actually lives in Minnesota? It makes me so mad that you stroke Pawlenty's ego with articles like this!!
>> Minnesotan Tuesday, May 19, 2009 8:24 AM Report Comment
I agree with others who have posted - Pawlenty is NOT a hero of tax reform. He'd rather borrow in combination with slashing of essential services so he can claim to never have raised taxes when he runs for higher office in 2012. He's forcing county and city governments across Minnesota to be the bad guys as they WILL be forced to raise taxes. That's not brave - it's self-serving.
>> Concerned MN Resident Tuesday, May 19, 2009 9:50 AM Report Comment
In response to those comments above: First, bonding against the tobacco settlement agreement is not fiscally irresponsible. Since the settlement is paid to states over a long period of time, they simply borrow against guaranteed future revenue. That means they won't have to raise taxes now OR in the future to cover the bonds. At least 6 states have done this to cover a total of $9 billion in overspending in lieu of tax hikes.
>> Kelly William Cobb Tuesday, May 19, 2009 12:35 PM Report Comment
Readers are correct that Minnesota property taxes are out of control. However, local aid is already paid for by your state taxes and then redistributed back to localities. Pawlenty’s proposal cuts aid by $480 million – less than 2% of the $24 billion in revenue localities had in 2006 (latest data). At the same time, spending by localities increased by 8% between 2003 and 2006, and in every year localities spent more money than they had in revenue. ATR does not support raising local taxes, however we do support accountability at local level, where overspending is as rampant as it is for the state.
>> Kelly William Cobb Tuesday, May 19, 2009 12:42 PM Report Comment
Ah yes, very heroic to call for the weakest and most vulnerable of the state to pull up their bootstraps for the rest of us. I get to keep an unnoticeable fraction of my pay check so I can stay fashionable and keep eating out while paying my car loans and cable bills while those less fortunate than me lose their General Medical Assistance Care. BUT NO NEW TAXES!!! WHOOOO!!!!
>> Minnesotan Tuesday, May 19, 2009 1:29 PM Report Comment
Minnesotan - if you have no problem with paying more to the government, you should campaign for a 'tax me more' fund to be started up in Minnesota so people like you who (who knows why) seem to think taxes are efficient and work can volunteer to give more money to the state for things like General Medical Assistance Care. Or is it that you only want other people to pay for you?>
>> Bill R Tuesday, May 19, 2009 1:46 PM Report Comment
Why aren't you calling for strict transparency legislation and spending restrictions? The reason people don't want higher taxes is they are giving their money over to people who have proven to spend it ineffectively (to say the least). Borrowing is not a long term solution either, the answer is to streamline the government and dump programs that waste ludicrous amounts of cash. BUT if the taxpayers never stand up and say 'stop!', then the government will never exercise fiscal restraint because they can always rob the people to satisfy themselves and their special interests.
>> Maximillian Tuesday, May 19, 2009 2:10 PM Report Comment
If you feel guilty about being 'more fortunate than others' (I would say you are not as fortunate as you think judging by your brain malfunction) Feel free to go give your belongings to the nearest poor people. That would be far more efficient than giving it to the government first.
>> Maximillian Tuesday, May 19, 2009 2:13 PM Report Comment
Maximillian - the reason people don't like taxes is NOT because they give it to people who have been proven to spend it ineffectively. Whilst it is true that governments spend money ineffectively (to say the least) this isn't the fundamental problem with taxes. Similarly the fact that taxes depress the economy, kill jobs and hurt family isn't the main reason why taxes are bad. The real problem with taxes is that they take money away from people who earned it and give it to people who don't. Legalized theft. Simple as that. Also - Minnesotan 1 - Why do you hate freedom?
>> Freedom Fighter Tuesday, May 19, 2009 2:17 PM Report Comment
FREEEEEEDOOOOMMMM!
>> Cambodian Midget Fighter Tuesday, May 19, 2009 2:21 PM Report Comment
I disagree with Cobb and do believe that borrow on the future revenues of the tobacco settlements is fiscally irresponsible. One, those funds are not yet in pocket, so pulling income from outside of the budget cycle defies the purpose of a balanced budget law. Two, the use of the funds is not the intended use of those funds. So, those funds are being misappropriated. Both of these points demonstrate fiscal irresponsibility. The "No New Taxes" pledge people need to focus not on the politician's end of the pledge, but on the citizen's end. Who cares what the politician's claim... does the citizen play more at the end of the year? In Minnesota, we are paying more under Pawlenty. Back to the beginning... he is no hero.
>> Minnesotan #1 Tuesday, May 19, 2009 4:26 PM Report Comment
Citizens of MN once had a quality of life envied by the rest of the nation. Under Pawlenty's "no new taxes" policy, MN is no longer the great place to live it once was. P.S. While Pawlenty is allergic to new taxes, he doesn't seem to mind "fees" or any other "taxes in disguise". He also has no qualms about pushing off state budget responsibilities onto local government agencies. It's all a shell game.
>> Concerned MN Resident Wednesday, May 20, 2009 12:10 AM Report Comment