In complete contrast, when former Gov. Tim Kaine left office he proposed a budget that contained a multitude of tax and fee increases to raise revenue. But buried deep in this budget was another disturbing revenue raiser: a 2% markup in the price of distilled spirits. Currently, Virginia’s controlled state status makes it the monopoly seller of liquor, meaning no private retailers can even touch it. So, when the state wants more money, it can just artificially inflate the price – in this case a whopping $8 million markup.

 

The two paths outlined by Gov. McDonnell and former Gov. Kaine are utterly contradictory. Selling the state-run alcohol beverage stores not only brings in more revenue and gets the state out of the business of selling spirits, but it allows the free-market – not the state – to determine the price of alcoholic beverages. This is an idea that should be employed by other states that have monopoly control of liquor stores. Unfortunately, however, to date no effort has been made by policymakers to remove this ridiculous price control mechanism out of the current budget.

 

Last fall, the voters of Virginia rejected Kaine’s agenda of higher taxes, fees, and markups by electing a governor that campaigned on a platform of limited governance. ATR strongly supports Gov. McDonnell’s plan to privatize the Commonwealth’s ABC stores and urges lawmakers to remove the markup on spirits from the budget.

 

Also , click here for ATR’s letter warning of taxes masquerading as “fees” and “markups” in the Virginia budget.

 

it seems like this 2% markup would be useless considering that there is a Senate Bill that is making its way through the general assembly http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?101+sum+SB443
>> Steve Rogers Wednesday, January 27, 2010 3:28 PM Report Comment

First, privatization seems like a great way to encourage enterprise and the creation of new jobs as individuals find their way into new alcohol stores that may open without as strong of regulation/control by the government. Secondly, this article provided by CATO shows (along with numerous other reasons such as protecting individual liberty and the idiocy of increasing funding for extraneous spending and wasteful programs) the fallacious thought that leads to increasing alcohol taxes: http://www.cato.org/pubs/journal/cj15n2-3-7.html The optimal situation for the people AND state of Virginia is the fiscal deregulation, NOT taxation of alcohol.
>> Bgall Wednesday, January 27, 2010 4:25 PM Report Comment

Isn't it interesting how governments do everything they can (through subsidies) to LOWER the price of ethanol as a fuel, but do everything they can to RAISE the price (through taxes)of ethanol as a beverage?
>> Chris Marrou Sunday, January 31, 2010 5:11 PM Report Comment