- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
- Washington Welcomes Cost of Government Day (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
- Government Workers' Pensions are Underfunded by $3 Trillion
Monday, August 23, 2010
- Fourteen Ways to Reduce Government Spending
- FCC Report on Broadband Performance: A Scare Tactic
- Sen. Al Franken Doesn’t Understand Wireless Networks...or the First Amendment
Friday, August 20, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 19, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
Geithner Looking at Wrong Target
on Obama's Small Business Tax Hikes
From Ryan Ellis on Friday, March 6, 2009 1:24 PM
Treasury Secretary Tim Geither, echoing President Obama, has repeatedly said that their trillion-dollar tax hike won't be that harmful to small business, since relatively-few small business owners will be affected.
That's absolutely true, and absolutely misses the point.
Geither, et al, are looking at the wrong measurement of the Obama tax hike's impact on the small business sector of the economy.
Consider what Geither today said in National Journal's "Congress Daily AM"
"Now, I just want to pause here for one second," Geithner told the House Budget Committee Thursday, his third appearance on Capitol Hill in three days. "Those proposed changes in tax rates would apply to only 2 to 3 percent of small-business owners across the country, only 2 to 3 percent. Ninety-five percent of small-business owners ... have incomes below that threshold of $250,000."
It might surprise some to learn that ATR agrees with this statement. It's consistent with a reasonable interpretation of IRS data.
However, it completely and totally misses the key point: the Obama tax hike will raise the tax rate on $2 out of every $3 in small business profits. Fully two-thirds of small business profits (and thus the small business sector of the economy) pay taxes in households Obama wants to raise taxes on. Small businesses pay taxes on their owner's 1040 forms.
Breaking it down further, it's $0.40 out of every $1.00 in sole proprietor profits. It's $0.90 out of every dollar of business partnership and S-corporation profits.
So how is this possible? How can the Obama tax hike apply to a relative handful of small business owners, but at the same time to the lion's share of small business profits?
Simple--the few small business owners that Obama is hiking taxes on also happen to be the ones generating most of the small business profits in America.
When the Obama tax hike takes money out of the small business sector, it will cost jobs and shrink investment. According to the Census Bureau, firms with fewer than 100 workers employ 43 million Americans, or over one-third of everyone working in the United States.
The fact is, it's the successful small businesses that Obama and Geither want to raise taxes on who employ these tens of millions of American workers.
Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: TAXES, THEPLEDGE, POLITICS, CONGRESS, OBAMA, BUDGET














Comments
Those successful business owners are the ones who are most likely to have the vision to recognize other opportunities and expand or start more business and create more jobs. These people are the last ones we should be targeting.
>> Jim Sunday, March 8, 2009 1:21 AM Report Comment
We need 23 republicans in 2010. Let's get it done. This President is the party of NO CLUE. I am proud to be a Republican party of NO, far better then the Party of NO CLUE.
>> Noelle Thursday, March 26, 2009 5:56 PM Report Comment