Inspector General: Lois Lerner’s Hard Drive “More than likely crashed due to an impact of some sort”

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Alexander Hendrie on Thursday, June 25th, 2015, 12:49 PM PERMALINK


Lois Lerner’s hard drive “more than likely crashed due to an impact of some sort,” according to Congressional testimony submitted today from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA).

According to the testimony, Lerner’s laptop stopped communicating with the IRS server on Saturday June 11, 2011, between 5:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. On Monday June 13, 2011, Lerner reported the laptop inoperable. Her laptop was then serviced by an IRS IT staff technician and a Hewlett-Packard contractor:

“When asked about the possible cause of the hard drive failure, the HP technician opined that heat-related failures are not seen often, and based on the information provided to him, the hard drive more than likely crashed due to an impact of some sort. However, because the HP technician did not examine the hard drive as part of his work on the laptop, it could not be determined why it crashed.”

Lerner Hard Drive Contained “Scoring on the top platter”

On July 19, 2011, Lerner asked IRS IT to try to recover the lost data in order to find “personal information.” The hard drive was passed from the IRS IT technician to the IRS Criminal Investigation Division (IRS-CI). The attempt to recover the data was not successful.

Curiously, the IRS-CI technician “noted some scoring on the top platter of the drive, and he believed there were additional steps that could have been taken to attempt to recover data. IRS IT management determined the extra effort to recover data from Ms. Lerner’s hard drive was not worth the expense.”

Photo Credit: 
US House of Representatives Committee of Oversight & Government Reform

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Top Comments

ne14a1e

That dress is the same one Hillary is so fond of. Must be the color of choice for corrupt federal officials.

iVillageIdiot

The "impact of some sort" why-I-lost-my-memory defense. Works for hard drives containing potentially incriminating evidence and Secs of State that want to delay testifying in front of a congressional committee with equal efficacy.


Amtrak Wastes Billions on Fraudulent Wages

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Kendyll Ferrall on Thursday, June 25th, 2015, 10:00 AM PERMALINK


Amtrak employees have apparently discovered time travel.

At least, that's one explanation for the report released by the Amtrak Office of Inspector General (AOIG) last week that discovered employees are claiming to have worked upwards of 47-hour days. The report found that discrepancies in employees’ reported hours are largely the result of the increasingly complicated and intricate union agreements Amtrak must enter into every year. The analysis embodied six years of documented waste and abuse stemming from fraudulent and inaccurate timesheets.

Last year, Amtrak entered into 23 separate bargaining agreements with the 14 different unions that cover the train service’s 19,300 employees. Each agreement contains complex and specific rules for calculating an employee’s hours and wages. Under the agreements, Amtrak uses six different timekeeping systems to process the 4.5 million daily timesheets and calculate pay.

In addition to the eyebrow-raising work day claims, the investigation found instances of employees who reported to have worked over 100-consecutive days and who recorded working 957 weeks with only overtime hours and no regular hours. The AIOG report found that employees claimed to work 2,381 weeks with at least 40 overtime hours on top of their regular 40 hours.

The federally-owned rail line spends $1.2 billion on wages as the result of fraudulent and inaccurate timesheet data. Requests for overtime-pay in 2014 totaled $199 million; roughly 25 percent of regular wages paid. Nearly a third of Amtrak’s budget goes to labor costs for employees under the union agreements that are making it difficult for employees to accurately report their hours.

The AOIG found that employees belonging to the Amtrak Service Workers Council were responsible for repeatedly reporting the most overtime hours without regular hours, with the highest claim at 769 hours over nine weeks. Employees covered under the Brotherhood of Railway Signalmen and the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees had the highest instances of reporting overtime hours that totaled more than 100 percent of their regular hours.

The AOIG’s investigation into wasteful spending at the hands of the unions came on the heels of calls to increase Amtrak’s funding after May’s deadly train derailment. The report was released on the same day that Sens. Corey Booker (D-N.J.) and Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) introduced S. 1626, a bill that would increase Amtrak’s funding to $9 billion over the next four years. The Railroad Reform, Enhancement, and Efficiency Act calls for $1.4 billion more than its House counterpart, but this report shows that the last thing Amtrak needs is more taxpayer money.

If Amtrak wants more money to improve its safety and increase its efficiency, maybe it should start with the millions of dollars that are being wasted on labor.

 

Photo Credit: 
Bill Dickinson https://www.flickr.com/photos/skynoir/

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Top Comments

alsports2000

Make the so called brotherhood pay all that money back so that I can have enough money myself to take care of my dental bills...

finnegan

Easy solution. CEO bonuses and union employee salaries and raises for all government agencies should be determined by how much money they SAVE in their departments per year.

Lickylick

Um, wasted taxpayer money???? Sounds more like theft of taxpayer money. Every employee known to have stolen money through fraudulent timesheets should have to pay the money back plus be charged with the crime of stealing public funds and stand trial. They are thieves committing felonies.


Oh Weird: The IRS Deleted 422 Backup Tapes With Lerner Emails

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Alexander Hendrie on Thursday, June 25th, 2015, 9:41 AM PERMALINK


The IRS “accidentally” erased 422 backup tapes that investigators believe contained emails to and from IRS official Lois Lerner, according to the Associated Press.

The tapes contained as many as 24,000 Lois Lerner emails. The tapes were erased eight months after Congressional investigators requested all emails to and from Lois Lerner and a month after the IRS informed Congress they were missing some of Lois Lerner’s emails.

“If the establishment press treated Richard Nixon’s missing audio the way they are treating the destruction of emails by the Obama IRS, Nixon would have served a full eight years as President,” said Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform. 

Photo Credit: 
Ray Tsang

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Top Comments


Ex-Im Bank Blames “Capitalism” After Losing $150 Million on Risky Loan

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Emma Boone on Thursday, June 25th, 2015, 9:30 AM PERMALINK


The Export Import Bank, criticized for its ties to fraud, waste and abuse, has left taxpayers on the hook for $150 million dollars thanks to another reckless loan.

In 2012 Ex-Im provided $280 million to NewSat, an Australian satellite company, to purchase a satellite from U.S. based Lockheed Martin. Just months after receiving the loan, NewSat declared bankruptcy.

This disgraceful loan has led to House Oversight and Government Reform Committee investigating Ex-Im’s financing of the satellite company. Acting Inspector General of Ex-Im, Mike McCarthy, admitted that since NewSat declared bankruptcy the deal has led to the loss of at least $150 million in taxpayer funds.

Ex-Im President Fred Hochberg defending the NewSat deal describing it as “a project that’s in labor” and arguing that these careless loans are “what capitalism is about.” Aside from the absurdity of these statements and Hochberg’s sad attempt to tone down yet another loan failure, had Ex-Im done their homework, this million dollar disaster could have been avoided.

A report released by NewSat shows the company’s financial problems and irresponsible spending patterns, at one point spending $1.2 million on travel alone in a three year span. Taxpayers should be outraged at the millions of taxpayer dollars Ex-Im wastes loaning mismanaged foreign companies.

Perhaps most concerningly, it appears that former CEO of NewSat and Chairman Fred Hochberg had established a business relationship long before Ex-Im handed out the multi-million dollar loan. This cozy relationship yet again raises questions about Ex-Im working with companies based purely on political connections.

The outdated Ex-Im Bank is set to expire at the end of the month and supporters of the bank are frantically searching for a way they can to hold on to this instrument of crony capitalism. Congress should put an end to the culture of corporate welfare and political favoritism and end the Ex-Im Bank.

Photo Credit: 
David Scaglione

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Top Comments


Report Shows Americans Flee High-Tax States, Embrace Low-Tax States

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Conner Lynch on Wednesday, June 24th, 2015, 4:00 PM PERMALINK


Americans are fleeing states with high taxes for low-tax states according to recent analysis by John Schoen and CNBC.

By inspecting data from the Federation of Tax Administrators and national moving companies United Van Lines and Atlas Van Lines, a clear link appears between higher taxes and residents looking to relocate. Not surprisingly, these individuals are looking to migrate to states that encourage innovation and economic growth rather than stay in hostile business and tax climates.

Low Taxes Precipitate Population Inflows

As states lower their tax rates, they can expect individuals to flock there for better jobs, higher wages, and greater opportunity. As Travis Brown describes, states with the lowest tax rates like Texas are experiencing booms in their populations under the age of 18 while those states with high tax rates lost a large percentage of their youth population in recent years:

“Many of the states that lost a significant percentage of their under-18 population between 2000 and 2013 are those with fewer opportunities for growth – thanks to high tax rates that discourage innovation and expansion. Ranking at the very bottom, with its youth population decreased by 15.9 percent, is Vermont. Not at all coincidentally, Vermont also levies the nation’s seventh-highest personal income tax rate on its working citizens.”

Predictably, as younger people seek to find new jobs and opportunities, the obvious choice for residency is low-tax states. If states drastically increase the cost of working and living, they will lose their younger population to places that welcome their innovation. Brown claims that these pro-growth states are drawing in the best young talent across the nation:

“Clearly, population grows more quickly in places where work is rewarded and the price on that work is kept low. But the key new piece of information that the 50-State Scorecard shows us is that a large segment of the next generation of American business leaders and innovators are growing up in states that encourage growth.”

Tax Increases Force Exodus of Businesses and Residents

As many states wrap up their legislative sessions and finalize their budgets, the evidence is clear that states that choose tax increases see losses of both residents and businesses. Connecticut recently finalized its budget and passed a $1.2 trillion tax hike that raised income, sales, and corporates taxes. In response, GE and other major companies are looking to relocate and find a state that would welcome their business and jobs them rather than simply hike their tax rates. In addition, the CNBC study shows that Connecticut has experienced a net outward household flow of 58 percent in recent years while also levying some of the highest taxes in the country. This leads one to believe it’s probably not a coincidence.

As states move forward and examine their tax policies, the results are clear. Lower taxes leads to increased migration, population booms, balanced budgets, and economic growth. Higher taxes lead to net citizen and business losses, stagnation, and budget deficits. It appears the choice is a clear one.

 

Photo Credit: 
Ken Teegardin, http://bit.ly/1dgMD8S

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Top Comments


Florida Governor Rick Scott Cuts Spending and Taxes in 2015

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Paul Blair on Wednesday, June 24th, 2015, 3:12 PM PERMALINK


This week, Governor Rick Scott (R-Fla.) signed a 78.2 billion budget that included a historic $461.4 million in line item spending cuts, among the largest cuts ever made by a governor. This comes on the heels of a $429 million tax cut package, which he signed just last week.

Taxpayers have a friend in Gov. Scott, who said this of his cuts: “I went through the budget looking at every project and saying: What’s a statewide priority? Can I get a good return on investment? Has it gone through a state process?”

In his letter to the legislature, he explained why he line item vetoed specific projects by noting:

“Tax revenue is generated by Floridians who are working hard to provide for their families and we are committed to effectively using these dollars by investing them in areas with proven results. That is why I have vetoed $461.1 million in special projects.”

Below is a list of several special spending projects inserted into the budget by lawmakers, both Republican and Democrat alike:  

  • $300,000 for a water taxi on Clearwater Beach
  • $1 million for the restoration of a marina in Pahokee
  • $1 million to expand a library in Palm Harbor
  • $5 million for “strategic land acquisition”
  • $250,000 for the Institute for Cuban and Cuban-American studies, which already received $600,000 for two prior reports
  • $1.5 million for Teach for America
  • $260,000 for the Therapeutic Performing Arts Therapy program
  • $140,000 for “Nature’s Paradise”
  • $500,000 for a children’s “ability center”
  • $5.5 million for no-bid contracts for wetland/chemical treatment systems and two floating aquatic vegetative tilling treatment systems
  • $550,000 for “promotional awards” at the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services”
  • $2 million for a horse park
  • $250,000 for the Arcadia Rodeo
  • $10 million in “Quiet Zone” improvements
  • $500,000 in media campaigns to publicize the dangers of unlicensed real estate activity
  • $500,000 for the Circus Arts Conservatory
  • $500,000 for the relocation of the Miami Boat Show
  • $61,366 for the a Plant Museum in Tampa
  • $200,000 for a contemporary dance company in Miami

 

A health insurer also tried to pass on the costs of federal Obamacare taxes onto state taxpayers. Rick Scott put a stop to $136,000 in that expenditure and hundreds of thousands in tax dollars intended to fund electronic medical record systems for private organizations.

The governor also vetoed millions of dollars in local water treatment and improvement projects; expenditures the governor rightly argues must meet a statewide investment benefit.

At the conclusion of his letter, Scott again voluntarily reduced his state-funded salary to one cent per month.

For Republican governors looking for role models, one needs to look no further than the Sunshine State where a beacon of hope remains. Transparency remains an effective disinfectant for out-of-control spending and Scott’s vetoes send an effective message to legislators, even in years where the state has a surplus: taxpayers will not be swindled by back-room budget deals; the governor is watching. 

Click here for the full list of vetoes. 

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Top Comments

Keith Allsop

He is in CT poaching jobs LOL. CT democrats - no tax increase left behind.


Schumer: Hillary Win Could Pave the Way for Carbon Tax

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Alexander Hendrie on Wednesday, June 24th, 2015, 3:08 PM PERMALINK


In a recent speech, Senator Chuck Schumer (R-N.Y.) said he hopes for a Carbon tax if Hillary Clinton becomes President in 2016. In particular, he believes Republicans should “compromise” and agree to this tax:

“There's one sort of [value-added tax] Democrats might be for — and that's a carbon tax. So you might get a compromise along those lines.”

President Obama has considered implementing a carbon tax on several occasions during his presidency, however the idea has been met with fierce opposition. 

Schumer characterized the carbon tax as “the best way to fund the government” despite the idea previously being criticized by economists and businesses alike. 

His comments on the carbon tax as a way to address “revenue shortages” mirrors the rhetoric of “revenue enhancements” coming from the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign. Earlier this month, Clinton’s press secretary announced in a tweet that Clinton will be proposing several “revenue enhancements,” or tax increases over the summer and fall. 

Photo Credit: 
Azi Paybarah; https://www.flickr.com/photos/azipaybarah/

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Top Comments

James Richard Spriggs

Chuck Shumer is a Democrat, not a Republican.


IRS Gave Contracts to Felons, Tax Cheats

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Alexander Hendrie on Wednesday, June 24th, 2015, 11:16 AM PERMALINK


The IRS has illegally given 57 contracts to 17 companies that owed back taxes or had a felony conviction in 2012 and 2013, according to a newly released report from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA).

According to the report, the IRS does not have effective controls in place to ensure they did not award contracts to corporations that had federal tax debt or a felony conviction. As the report finds:

“the IRS was not in compliance with Department of the Treasury implementing guidance which required COs to obtain a self-certification from corporations as to whether they have certain Federal tax debt and/or felony convictions prior to awarding contracts with FYs 2012 and 2013 appropriated funds.”

This has occurred because the IRS has failed to establish a definition of “federal tax debt” and does not perform any reviews to determine whether contractors are in compliance. As a result, TIGTA’s review identified ZERO contracts that contained the required contract clause and certification guidelines. TIGTA estimates at least 94 percent of contracts are awarded without adhering to this law. As the report states:

“Our review identified zero contracts in which the CO inserted the required contract clause and obtained the required representation and certification prior to contract award. This resulted in a 94 percent error rate….We are 95 percent confident that between 3,738 and 3,970 new contracts (from a population of 3,970) awarded to corporations during our audit period were done so without inserting the required contract clause and obtaining required representation and certification prior to award.”

As a result, TIGTA identified 17 corporations that received 57 contracts valued at $18.8 million despite having outstanding tax debt or a felony conviction.

In its response to TIGTA, the IRS asserted that it was “appropriate” to award these contracts to the companies, despite being prohibited by federal law from using funds in this manner.

Photo Credit: 
Martin Haesemeyer; https://www.flickr.com/photos/haesemeyer/

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Top Comments

ExRepug

Okay, don't leave us in suspense. What is the legal definition of "federal tax debt?


The Ex-Im Bank is an Outdated Relic From a By-Gone Era

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Alexander Hendrie on Wednesday, June 24th, 2015, 10:00 AM PERMALINK


With the charter of the Export-Import Bank (Ex-Im) set to expire at the end of the month, its supporters are desperately trying to keep it alive, with one supporter warning of “economic catastrophe” if the bank is not renewed. The truth is, Ex-Im is no longer needed. It was established in a different era, and American exporters will be just fine without it.  At the end of the month, Congress must take a stand against crony capitalism and put an end to this out-of-date bank.

The Ex-Im Bank was established in 1934 following an executive order by President Roosevelt, in order to assist American exporters operate overseas at a time of significant trade barriers. In 1934, the average tariff on dutiable imports sat at 46.7 percent around the world. But today, the average tariff rate has dropped to below five percent as more and more countries embrace free trade. At present there are over 400 free trade agreements in effect across the world, with more going into effect each year. As these trade barriers have dissolved, Ex-Im has become less and less a tool for American exporters and more a method for backdoor corporate welfare.

While Ex-Im may have once been a vital tool for American exporters, it has become harder and harder to justify its existence amid countless controversies. In the past six years, the Ex-Im Bank has been involved in numerous scandals culminating in 85 criminal indictments, 48 criminal judgments, and over $250 million in fines, restitution, and forfeiture.

In addition to these scandals, the claim that the bank is needed to help exporters is dubious at best. Currently, the bank assists less than two percent of exports, and those “reliant” on the bank can easily access alternative (and more efficient) sources of financing.

The primary beneficiaries of Ex-Im, corporate giants like Caterpillar and Boeing will have no trouble securing private sector loans. Countless private financiers consider Ex-Im a competitor, and they have said they could easily step in to pick up the slack if need be.

This is not even the only option available for companies seeking financing. In many cases, well-resourced corporations can offer their own financing in order to continue competing. But in many of these cases there probably was never a need for financing in the first place. Emirates Airlines, a major foreign company that benefited from Ex-Im loans has said they utilize the financing even though they do not need it, and they would still buy from Boeing without them. 

Clearly, the Ex-Im bank is no longer needed to support US exports. Not only is the bank a response to a problem that no longer exists, but the companies that overwhelmingly benefit from loans have countless other financing options. Congress must do the right thing by ending the Ex-Im bank and putting a stop to this institution that unjustly picks winners and losers.

Photo Credit: 
Evangelio Gonzalez

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Top Comments


EPA WOTUS Rule will Crush Property Rights and Cost Millions

Share on Facebook
Tweet this Story
Pin this Image

Posted by Dorothy Jetter on Wednesday, June 24th, 2015, 9:25 AM PERMALINK


Last month the EPA released its final draft of the Waters of the U.S. (WOTUS) rule, which will allow it to regulate private property anywhere that water can conceivably flow. Under these new regulations, the EPA can control everything from drains and ditches to small wetlands that have a “significant nexus” to a navigable waterway.  Specifically, waters nearly a mile (4,000 feet) away from the high water mark of a navigable waterway could be subject to increased regulations.

Senator Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) write in a joint Op-Ed that according to the EPA’s own estimates, the finalized WOTUS rule will cost American property owners and small businesses between $158 million and $465 million a year.   The American Farm Bureau Federation calls the guidelines for this rule "so over broad and so vague that they are open to wildly varying agency interpretations."  

For example, take the case of Wyoming farmer Andy Johnson.  After putting significant time and effort into building a needed stock pond on his private property, Johnson is facing backlash from the EPA under the new WOTUS rules.  Despite complying with all applicable state rules, the EPA claims that Johnson needed a permit from the agency when deciding what to do with his land.  Johnson claims that the agency has threatened him with severe criminal charges and a daily fine of $75,000.  

 Speaker Boehner (R-Ohio) released the following statement in response to the WOTUS rule: 

“The administration’s decree to unilaterally expand federal authority is a raw and tyrannical power grab that will crush jobs.  House Members of both parties have joined more than 30 governors and government leaders to reject EPA’s disastrous WOTUS rule.  These leaders know firsthand that the rule is being shoved down the throats of hardworking people with no input, and places landowners, small businesses, farmers, and manufacturers on the road to a regulatory and economic hell.” 

WOTUS is just one example of continued EPA overreach that will cost American taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars.  Under the finalized rule, the EPA will not only infringe the property rights of millions of American taxpayers and small businesses, but will ironically do so using their own tax dollars.   

Photo Credit: 
JR P

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Top Comments


hidden
×