Tax Reform ATR believes that all consumed income should be taxed one time, at one low and flat rate. Link
In new @DailyCaller op-ed, @GroverNorquist urges Congress to question IRS agents involved in this scandal: http://t.co/M0gV2GpQ9G
taxreformer
Gov. Bob McDonnell Signs Largest Tax Hike in Virginia History into Law: http://t.co/iENksi7uQi
taxreformer
IRS tax return preparation invites a conflict of interest: http://t.co/oKvpIofu7Y
taxreformer
These destructive #Obamacare tax hikes will soon be implemented: http://t.co/opFkyf1guJ
taxreformer
"Saying the Marketplace Fairness Act is fair is like saying the Affordable Care Act makes health care affordable" -@MarshaBlackburn
taxreformer
"I can't believe #Obamacare led to higher health care costs," said no economist ever: http://t.co/J6dfnKqFYZ
taxreformer
#Obamacare's 10% tanning tax hits salon owners and customers, most of which are women: http://t.co/dJuaGAT9LE
taxreformer
Groups who advocated for the IRS to prepare tax returns sure look foolish these days: http://t.co/oKvpIofu7Y
taxreformer
"We don't need the federal government mandating additional taxes..." -@MarshaBlackburn on MFA: http://t.co/lAuLJtr5t3 #NoNetTax
taxreformer
Health insurers and businesses are already feeling the iron-clad grip of regulations in #Obamacare: http://t.co/J6dfnKqFYZ
taxreformer
Chris Butler, ATR’s Chief of Staff, wrote a piece that appeared on NRO”s The Corner yesterday explaining the dangers of the FCC and the U.S. Senate creating new regulations that interfere with the private contracts between providers and manufacturers.
The rapid technological advances in mobile technology are due in large part to the funding provided by exclusivity agreements.
FCC and Senate Flirting with Crippling Cell-Phone Regulation
If you like the frantic pace of technological development in the wireless arena, and fierce free-market competition between the iPhone, the new Palm Pre, and Research In Motion’s Blackberry, you should be concerned by the prospect of new FCC regulations.
Thanks to rapid technological advances, mobile phones are turning into handheld computers with more power than desktop PCs had just a few years ago. While consumers love the multiplying choices and the technological leaps, many don’t understand how they get funded.
The most important developments in mobile technology have required creative funding streams that have necessitated carrier exclusivity agreements. For example, the iPhone’s “natural” cost would be well north of $600, were Apple not able to create a subsidy for purchasers through an exclusive partnership with AT&T.
Exclusive and exciting technology generates more subscribers to the carrier, which allows it to subsidize the technology on the front end. Further, exclusivity creates incentives for new phones to be developed in partnership with competing carriers. (Case in point: the Palm Pre.)
Enter the dark clouds of FCC regulation. The Commission is set to determine whether these private contracts between providers and manufacturers are “anticompetitive” and “contrary to the public interest,” which would be a reversal of its own decision in 1992. Unfortunately, the Senate seems eager for such a reversal; today the Commerce Committee is holding hearings on the subject.
These hearings, and subsequent FCC proceedings, could be a bellwether of how the Obama administration and Congress will handle telecom and technological issues. If they embrace heavy-handed, meddlesome regulation, that will bode ill for one of the U.S. economy’s few remaining growth areas.— Chris Butler is chief of staff at Americans for Tax Reform.
To follow Adam Radman's RSS feed click here. To follow them on Twitter, their handle is @adamradman