- Transparency Advocates Agree: White House Has Been "Useless" (CFA Site »)
- Rick Larsen Campaign Caught Telling Lies about the “No New Taxes” Pledge
Thursday, September 9, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 8, 2010
- President Clings to Failure, Ignores Obvious Solutions
- Denny Heck Campaign Caught Telling Lies about the “No New Taxes” Pledge
- Video: JFK vs. Obama on Tax Cuts
- Big Labor Backs Democrats in Hopes of a Pension Bailout (AWF Site »)
- Teacher's Pensions: Overblown and Underfunded (AWF Site »)
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
- Lassa Campaign Following the Tactics of the DCCC in WI-07
- Fact Checking President Obama's Labor Day Speech (AWF Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight September 7, 2010
- Senator Kerry at it Again
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
- Flush With Union Cash, DC Mayoral Candidate Vincent Gray Looks to Roll Back DC School Reform
Sunday, September 5, 2010
- Maryland Ranks as 47th State to Celebrate COGD (CFA Site »)
Saturday, September 4, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 3, 2010
- Dina Titus Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge is Thoroughly Misleading
-
120 Days to Go Until the
Largest Tax Hikes in History - Government vs. Private Control and "Balkanization" of the Internet
-
Get 'Em While They're Hot:
Medicine Cabinet Tax Hits in 120 Days
Friday, September 3, 2010
- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
Thursday, August 26, 2010
Energy Tax Hike Series: Repeal of Percentage Depletion Deduction
From Christopher Prandoni on Thursday, February 25, 2010 10:54 AMThe President’s FY 2011 budget contains hundreds of billions of dollars in new taxes on energy production and consumption. These taxes will result in higher prices at the pump, increased utility bills and less American energy jobs as companies flee the U.S. to avoid these industry crippling taxes. The full energy tax booklet is available here.
One of these changes is repealing the percentage depletion tax deduction. This change will result in billions of dollars of new taxes.
The IRS defines depletion as “the using up of natural resources by mining, quarrying, drilling, or felling. The depletion deduction allows an owner or operator to account for the reduction of a product’s reserves.” For over a century there have been two ways to calculate deductions: cost depletion and percentage depletion.
The preferred method of deduction, percentage depletion allows the producer to deduct the gross income derived from extracting fossil fuels or other minerals. Originally implemented to encourage domestic development of natural resources, percentage depletion allows for producers to collect a percentage, depending on the resource being mined, of their income tax-free.
Traditionally, oil producers have been able to deduct approximately 15% of their income while coal producers have deducted 10%. Comparatively, sulphur and uranium producers deduct 22%.
- Impact on oil and natural gas: Repealing percentage depletion will raise taxes by $522 million in 2011 and 10.026 billion by 2020
- Impact on hard mineral fossil fuels (coal): – Repealing percentage depletion will raise taxes by $57 million in 2011 and $1.062 billion by 2020.
- Total impact: $579 million tax increases in 2011 and 11.088 billion in tax increases by 2020
Mining natural resources continues to be one of the riskiest investments and requires enormous amounts of capitol. Furthermore, it may take years to recuperate investments because resource extraction does not begin immediately. Percentage depletion has gone a long way to alleviate the concerns of investors and small companies, its repeal will only add uncertainty to already weary producers.
While producers of other minerals (gravel, clay, gold, etc) will be allowed to continue percentage depletion discounts, oil, natural gas and coal producers will face enormous tax increases.
Check out the full table of energy tax increases and the industry impact numbers
and
a PDF document further explaining percentage depletion.
Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: TAXES, ENERGY, BUDGET, Federal














Add a Comment