- Flush With Union Cash, DC Mayoral Candidate Vincent Gray Looks to Roll Back DC School Reform
Sunday, September 5, 2010
- Maryland Ranks as 47th State to Celebrate COGD (CFA Site »)
Saturday, September 4, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 3, 2010
- Dina Titus Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge is Thoroughly Misleading
-
120 Days to Go Until the
Largest Tax Hikes in History - Government vs. Private Control and "Balkanization" of the Internet
-
Get 'Em While They're Hot:
Medicine Cabinet Tax Hits in 120 Days
Friday, September 3, 2010
- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
Monday, August 23, 2010
Energy Tax Hike Series: Raises Taxes on Tertiary Injectants
From Christopher Prandoni on Wednesday, March 3, 2010 12:15 PMThe President’s FY 2011 budget contains hundreds of billions of dollars in new taxes on energy production and consumption. These taxes will result in higher prices at the pump, increased utility bills and less American energy jobs as companies flee the U.S. to avoid these industry crippling taxes. The full energy tax booklet is available here.
One of these changes is a repeal of the tertiary intectants tax deduction, a proposal that will raise billions of dollars worth of taxes.
In order to mine inaccessible oil reserves, oil producers often inject liquids and gasses into an oil well’s surrounding area, a process called tertiary injection. Domestic oil producers deduct the costs incurred from the tertiary injection process. Expenses that oil companies claim as deductions are: the cost of acquiring or producing the tertiary injectants, the costs associated with injecting, reinjecting, and recovering the purchased and produced tertiary injectants.
The administration has proposed to repeal tertiary injectants deductibility status. Doing so would raise taxes on energy producers by $5 million in 2011 and $67 million by 2020.
Changing how tertiary injections are listed under the tax code, from deductible to capital, will raise the initial investment required by producers looking to extract oil. Section 193 of the IRS code states that oil producers should be able to deduct “costs related to injecting a substance with a transitory effect on production” and “costs of producing and reinjecting gas or hydrocarbon liquids utilized in a recycling process.” Thus, if tertiary injectant deductions bolstered oil production, as the IRS code explicitly states, then rescinding it will have the oppose effect – stifling production.
The purpose of the deduction was to help producers pay for the high costs associated with tertiary injection. Changing how producers recover their initial investment could force companies to shut in older fields which would adversely affect local economies. In many tertiary injection projects carbon dioxide is the gas used to gain access to oil deposits. Utilizing carbon dioxide in enhanced oil recovery projects is one of the primary ways to prevent carbon dioxide from escaping into the atmosphere; keeping deductions for tertiary injectants would encourage this process.
Considering America’s oil and natural gas industry is one of the largest, supporting more than 9 million jobs, taxing tertiary injectants increases the cost of energy for every American family.
Check out the full table of energy tax increases and the industry impact numbers and a PDF document further explaining the tertiary injectant tax deduction.
Permalink | Email | Print | Tags: TAXES, ENERGY, BUDGET, Federal














Comments
Not Tertiary Injectants! Those Bastards! Ok, that actually does sound bad once I read it and found out what a tertiary injectant is. You win this round Prandoni.
>> TCH Wednesday, March 3, 2010 12:40 PM Report Comment