Tax Reform ATR believes that all consumed income should be taxed one time, at one low and flat rate. Link
OK Gov. Mary Fallin Releases Bold Tax Reform Plan http://t.co/oRPWYGKb
taxreformer
Senator Hatch looks to improve the Senate's Highway Bill http://t.co/rOZQENlQ
taxreformer
Senator Hatch tries to make a bad bill better http://t.co/F6VYT9NI
taxreformer
ATR Opposes Retroactive Tax Hikes http://t.co/XX2lRMyH
taxreformer
Has your Governor Issued a Proclamation Honoring Ronald Reagan on Feb 6th ? http://t.co/bHatxoTg
taxreformer
RT @timothy_stanley: Just interviewed @GroverNorquist. Flipped my view of the recession/election: recovery due to stopping Obama tax hik ...
timothy_stanley
RT @GroverNorquist: Reagan Birthday proclamations by 34 Governors, both R and D (Utah & Nevada just joined) 16 bitter D Govs fail test o ...
GroverNorquist
CoGC: House Republicans Lead on Budget Honesty http://t.co/wHJpzOC1
taxreformer
RT @MDuppler: Follow the Money taping - tonight 10 pm EST on Fox Biz (@ Fox News Washington Bureau) http://t.co/41Rucj7n
MDuppler
CoGC: CoGC & ATR Support Travel Transparency Act http://t.co/cSfR6qtD
taxreformer
The President’s FY 2011 budget contains hundreds of billions of dollars in new taxes on energy production and consumption. These taxes will result in higher prices at the pump, increased utility bills and less American energy jobs as companies flee the U.S. to avoid these industry crippling taxes. The full energy tax booklet is available here.
One of these changes is a repeal of the tertiary intectants tax deduction, a proposal that will raise billions of dollars worth of taxes.
In order to mine inaccessible oil reserves, oil producers often inject liquids and gasses into an oil well’s surrounding area, a process called tertiary injection. Domestic oil producers deduct the costs incurred from the tertiary injection process. Expenses that oil companies claim as deductions are: the cost of acquiring or producing the tertiary injectants, the costs associated with injecting, reinjecting, and recovering the purchased and produced tertiary injectants.
The administration has proposed to repeal tertiary injectants deductibility status. Doing so would raise taxes on energy producers by $5 million in 2011 and $67 million by 2020.
Changing how tertiary injections are listed under the tax code, from deductible to capital, will raise the initial investment required by producers looking to extract oil. Section 193 of the IRS code states that oil producers should be able to deduct “costs related to injecting a substance with a transitory effect on production” and “costs of producing and reinjecting gas or hydrocarbon liquids utilized in a recycling process.” Thus, if tertiary injectant deductions bolstered oil production, as the IRS code explicitly states, then rescinding it will have the oppose effect – stifling production.
The purpose of the deduction was to help producers pay for the high costs associated with tertiary injection. Changing how producers recover their initial investment could force companies to shut in older fields which would adversely affect local economies. In many tertiary injection projects carbon dioxide is the gas used to gain access to oil deposits. Utilizing carbon dioxide in enhanced oil recovery projects is one of the primary ways to prevent carbon dioxide from escaping into the atmosphere; keeping deductions for tertiary injectants would encourage this process.
Considering America’s oil and natural gas industry is one of the largest, supporting more than 9 million jobs, taxing tertiary injectants increases the cost of energy for every American family.
Check out the full table of energy tax increases and the industry impact numbers and a PDF document further explaining the tertiary injectant tax deduction.