Tax Reform ATR believes that all consumed income should be taxed one time, at one low and flat rate. Link
CoGC: Are Taxpayers: Broken-Hearted or Just Plain Broke? Government Drives Up the Cost of Valentine's Day http://t.co/TV6nHYzf
taxreformer
The Education and Workforce Committee holds hearing on NLRB "Recess" Appointments http://t.co/2ED4u4t8
taxreformer
Senate Highway Bill Violates Taxpayer Protection Pledge http://t.co/z7IETuQT
taxreformer
OK Gov. Mary Fallin Releases Bold Tax Reform Plan http://t.co/oRPWYGKb
taxreformer
Senator Hatch looks to improve the Senate's Highway Bill http://t.co/rOZQENlQ
taxreformer
Senator Hatch tries to make a bad bill better http://t.co/F6VYT9NI
taxreformer
ATR Opposes Retroactive Tax Hikes http://t.co/XX2lRMyH
taxreformer
Has your Governor Issued a Proclamation Honoring Ronald Reagan on Feb 6th ? http://t.co/bHatxoTg
taxreformer
RT @timothy_stanley: Just interviewed @GroverNorquist. Flipped my view of the recession/election: recovery due to stopping Obama tax hik ...
timothy_stanley
RT @GroverNorquist: Reagan Birthday proclamations by 34 Governors, both R and D (Utah & Nevada just joined) 16 bitter D Govs fail test o ...
GroverNorquist
Nearly two months after Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.) sent a letter to FCC Chairman Genachowski questioning the FCC's proposed Internet regulations, a response was finally returned on Monday. It took two letters from the Representative to elicit a response from the Chairman, which really is just another case of Genachowski ignoring Congress. In the original letter, Dingell urged Genachowski to abandon his attempts at reclassifying broadband, effectively giving the FCC authority over the internet. Dingell believes this is a Congressional issue, and that FCC is overstepping its authority in these attempts.
Last week Dingell sent Genachowski a second letter, again discouraging Genachowski’s plans, citing there was no legal backing the FCC could use to follow through with reclassification. After finally receiving a response, Dingell was less than impressed, still feeling that the FCC should wait to be given more power, instead of assuming authority. From the letter:
“Unfortunately, the paucity of substantive responses to my aforementioned questions in your recent letter has served only to substantiate my fear that the Commission’s proposed path with respect to the regulation of broadband is based on unsound reasoning and an incomplete record...
I worry that hurried action by the Commission to complete a rulemaking or issue a declaratory ruling concerning the classification of broadband Internet access services in the absence of a clear statutory mandate from the Congress will result in poor policy and protracted litigation, which itself will confound the Congress’ and the Commission’s efforts to encourage further investment in broadband infrastructure, create new jobs, and stimulate broadband adoption as we seek to implement network neutrality rules.
With this in mind, I reiterate my suggestion that the Commission abandon the classification effort it has set in motion and instead seek the authority it requires by asking the Congress to enact a statute that clearly delegates such authority. In this way, the Congress and Commission may ensure the steadfast legal foundation for an open internet.”
Opposition to the FCC's unilateral Internet regulation scheme is still growing; does the FCC and Genachowski need more public scoldings to end this ridiculous campaign?