INDEX
- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
- Washington Welcomes Cost of Government Day (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
- Government Workers' Pensions are Underfunded by $3 Trillion
Monday, August 23, 2010
- Fourteen Ways to Reduce Government Spending
- FCC Report on Broadband Performance: A Scare Tactic
- Sen. Al Franken Doesn’t Understand Wireless Networks...or the First Amendment
Friday, August 20, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 19, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
Court of USA TODAY Rules e-Tax Constitutional
From Kelly William CobbToday's USA TODAY opinion page sounded more like it was written by a politician than an editorial writer. Citing a boom in internet sales over the past decade, USA Today called for taxing internet transactions. The primary justification: "Hard-pressed states could use the money to reduce budget deficits."
The paper completely dismissed a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that such taxation is a clear violation of the dormant commerce clause and unconstitutional given the burden of tracking nearly 8,000 tax districts that aren't aligned with zip codes and change constantly. But, the Court of USA TODAY ruled instead that "it's hard to imagine that today's software wizards couldn't figure out a solution." Yes, they probably could, but the potential for "software wizards" to figure this out in the future doesn't make it any less of a current constitutional violation in some states. And even after they do figure it out, the service would come with a hefty price tag - one that brick-and-mortar retailers wouldn't have to pay.
Most proponents of the tax (including the New York Times and Pittsburgh Post-Gazette) have argued that it’s a question of fairness; that online retailers should collect because brick-and-mortar stores have to as well. This ignores the fact that brick-and-mortar retailers have to collect one tax, while online retailers would have to collect nearly 8,000 taxes at multiple rates (including combinations of state, county, and city taxes). That's not very fair either. Further, as an opposing view op-ed points out, states already have "use tax" laws on the books to require purchasers to remit the tax themselves. Just because a state has enforcement problems doesn't make forcing out-of-state retailers collect thousands of different taxes any less unfair.
So, what's the real justification for taxing internet sales? As USA TODAY put it: “Internet sales have skyrocketed, from $27 billion in 2000 to $133.6 billion last year.” That said, their entire editorial could have been summed up by one famous Willie Sutton quote. When asked why he robbed banks, Sutton simply replied "because that's where the money is."
For more information, visit www.StopETaxes.com.














Add a Comment