|
POLICY BRIEF FROM AMERICANS FOR TAX REFORM
Abolish the Telephone
Tax
by Peter
J. Ferrara
All Americans today pay a telephone
excise tax equal to 3% of their monthly telephone bill. Congress
first adopted a telephone excise tax in 1898 to help finance the Spanish-American
war. The war ended within a year or so. One hundred years later,
the telephone excise tax is still with us.
The tax is an object lesson in how
supposedly temporary government programs and taxes, once adopted, never
end. For the telephone excise tax has been continued for 100 years
now on one temporary excuse after another. The tax was actually phased
out after the Spanish-American war, but was reimposed on long distance
calls in 1914, and then fully reinstated to help finance World War I.
It was brought back to bolster government revenues during the Great
Depression, and then to help pay for World War II and the Korean War.
In 1966, the tax was increased from
3% of telephone bills to 10% to help pay for the Vietnam war.
After the war it was phased down to 3%, and then extended repeatedly
in the 1980s to help cover the deficit. The tax was permanently
set at 3% in the 1990 budget deal to close the deficit. Now the
deficit is long gone and the budget is in surplus, but the telephone
tax is still with us.
The tax was originally adopted as a
luxury tax on the rich, as only higher income people had phones 100
years ago. Today, the tax is a regressive burden on low income
workers, as it amounts to a much larger share of the meager incomes
of the poor than of the rich. Another lesson: taxes first adopted
on the rich always end up being paid by the middle class, where the
real money is. Often , even the poor end up paying. The telephone
excise tax imposes a total burden on the public of $5-$6 billion per
year. It is one part of the oppressive overall tax burden, which
costs the average family more than food, clothing, and shelter combined.
Taxes overall take 40% of national income, which is far too high. There
is no justification for the telephone tax and it should be repealed,
as part of a broader, overall tax reduction program.
|