Tax Reform ATR believes that all consumed income should be taxed one time, at one low and flat rate. Link
Groups who advocated for the IRS to prepare tax returns sure look foolish these days: http://t.co/oKvpIofu7Y
taxreformer
"We don't need the federal government mandating additional taxes..." -@MarshaBlackburn on MFA: http://t.co/lAuLJtr5t3 #NoNetTax
taxreformer
Health insurers and businesses are already feeling the iron-clad grip of regulations in #Obamacare: http://t.co/J6dfnKqFYZ
taxreformer
Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell Signs Largest Tax Hike in Virginia History into Law http://t.co/Qd6KOFfaPv
taxreformer
Under #Obamacare, mothers have had a tougher time purchasing non-prescription, over-the-counter medicine: http://t.co/dJuaGAT9LE
taxreformer
9 out of 20 #Obamacare tax hikes have not even been implemented yet: http://t.co/opFkyf1guJ
taxreformer
.@GroverNorquist on MFA: "[The Senate] didn't ask all of the questions that needed to be asked": http://t.co/wXfkIR2Ca9 #NoNetTax
taxreformer
"When architects of #Obamacare are worried about it creating a trainwreck, you know something's gone terribly wrong": http://t.co/J6dfnKqFYZ
taxreformer
Conservative and Free Market Groups Applaud Move to Delay a Vote on Gina McCarthy: http://t.co/lNQYmJAB12 #EPA
taxreformer
The #Obamacare train wreck will derail the American economy: http://t.co/opFkyf1guJ
taxreformer
The Connecticut Senate plans to hold a floor vote today on the budget agreement recently reached by legislative Democrats and first term Gov. Dannel Malloy (D). The plan, which entails two dozen tax increases, would technically be out of balance the moment it is signed into law and therefore unconstitutional.
The problem is that the budget assumes over $13 million in higher revenue from an online sales tax and cosmetic surgery tax. Yet, that revenue is highly unlikely to come to fruition according to Kevin Sullivan, Commissioner of the Connecticut Department of Revenue Services. CT News Junkie has the following on the letter that Commissioner Sullivan sent to the Office of Fiscal Analysis last month:
Sullivan goes onto say no state that has passed and implemented the tax has started collecting revenue and in all but one state, remote sellers like Amazon have simply ceased doing business with in-state businesses.....Sullivan noted in the letter that the Office of Fiscal Analysis which assumes the tax will bring in about $9.4 million a year never consulted his office when they drafted the fiscal note.
The same is true of the cosmetic tax which OFA assumes will bring in about $4.1 million next year and $4.3 million the year after.
A cosmetic tax also raises privacy concerns and has already proven to be a mistake in the only state where it has been enacted – New Jersey. Aside from the fact that it disproportionately burdens women, in today’s Daily Caller I explain why it is also a net revenue loser for the state:
The New Jersey lawmaker who sponsored the cosmetic tax in 2004 ended up leading the effort to repeal it just two years later, pointing to studies that found that for every dollar in tax collected by the Garden State’s cosmetic tax, the state actually lost $3.39 in revenue.
The budget to be voted on this week in Connecticut is a highly flawed document that relies on gimmicks, increases spending, and will only serve to impede economic recovery, increase revenue volatility, and create future budget holes. The House is expected to hold a floor vote on Tuesday. For extended commentary on the Connecticut budget debate in today’s Daily Caller, click here.
To follow Patrick Gleason's RSS feed click here. To follow them on Twitter, their handle is @patrickmgleason