Tax Reform ATR believes that all consumed income should be taxed one time, at one low and flat rate. Link
Blog: Tom Cross's hope for change to Obamacare - http://t.co/g6OFzp73 #atr ^
joshuaculling
ATR Urges North Carolina Legislators to Reject Anti-Free Enterprise Protectionism http://t.co/RIg4ejSB
taxreformer
ATR Releases 2012 List of State Taxpayer Protection Pledge Signers for May 22 Primaries http://t.co/maSodrTt
taxreformer
Senate Should Reject Importation of Foreign Price Controls on Rx Medicines http://t.co/ogZvZ0Yq
taxreformer
ATR Urges Illinois GOP Leaders to Stick to their Word on Tax Hikes http://t.co/XrCYJId0
taxreformer
In a @fxnopinion op-ed, @GroverNorquist urges Congress to bypass Obama and approve the Keystone pipeline http://t.co/43heBQhh ^
ChrisPrandoni
Blog: ATR urges Illinois GOP Leadership to stick to their word on tax hikes - http://t.co/FenLjInR #atr ^
joshuaculling
The Post Mortem on Maryland’s Special Tax Hike Session http://t.co/6nFjgjfF
taxreformer
What Tax Hikes Does Beth Anne Rankin (@BethAnneRankin) Support? http://t.co/dBs5DuV2 #AR04
taxreformer
What Tax Hikes Does Beth Anne Rankin Support? http://t.co/92cfRfYF
taxreformer
As the fallout from Climategate - where leaked emails reveal a history of lies and deception by global warming alarmists - continues, it is worth noting that this is not the first instance of scientific 'consensus' leading to calls for greater taxes has been proven wrong.
Robert Bradley provides this fascinating history of similar scares, such as the “population bomb” where many millions would die in food riots, the Club of Rome’s resource scare, when in 1972 57 predictions of exhaustion were made regarding 19 different minerals (all have either have been falsified or will be), and global cooling. He also draws an intersting - and most instructive - parallel:
Today’s Climategate is predictable with some of the same players at work–and many new ones as well. Remember how Paul R. Ehrlich treated his intellectual rival Julian Simon? The Stanford University biologist refused to debate Simon or even meet him in person. He insulted Simon repeatedly in print. Ehrlich even scolded Science magazine for publishing Simon’s 1980 breakthrough essay “Resources, Population, Environment: An Oversupply of Bad News,” with the words: “Could the editors have found someone to review Simon’s manuscript who had to take off this shoes to count to 20?” (quoted in Julian Simon, The Ultimate Resource II, 1996, p. 612).
Read the full post to see how it ended...