Tax Reform ATR believes that all consumed income should be taxed one time, at one low and flat rate. Link
#Obamacare's 10% tanning tax hits salon owners and customers, most of which are women: http://t.co/dJuaGAT9LE
taxreformer
Groups who advocated for the IRS to prepare tax returns sure look foolish these days: http://t.co/oKvpIofu7Y
taxreformer
"We don't need the federal government mandating additional taxes..." -@MarshaBlackburn on MFA: http://t.co/lAuLJtr5t3 #NoNetTax
taxreformer
Health insurers and businesses are already feeling the iron-clad grip of regulations in #Obamacare: http://t.co/J6dfnKqFYZ
taxreformer
Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell Signs Largest Tax Hike in Virginia History into Law http://t.co/Qd6KOFfaPv
taxreformer
Under #Obamacare, mothers have had a tougher time purchasing non-prescription, over-the-counter medicine: http://t.co/dJuaGAT9LE
taxreformer
9 out of 20 #Obamacare tax hikes have not even been implemented yet: http://t.co/opFkyf1guJ
taxreformer
.@GroverNorquist on MFA: "[The Senate] didn't ask all of the questions that needed to be asked": http://t.co/wXfkIR2Ca9 #NoNetTax
taxreformer
"When architects of #Obamacare are worried about it creating a trainwreck, you know something's gone terribly wrong": http://t.co/J6dfnKqFYZ
taxreformer
Conservative and Free Market Groups Applaud Move to Delay a Vote on Gina McCarthy: http://t.co/lNQYmJAB12 #EPA
taxreformer
As we are faced with the imminent prospect of government-rationed healthcare in the U.S., it is worth looking at the case of Coree Hanczyk, from Canada.
This isn't your standard horror story of government-run healthcare (although, of course, there are pleanty of those). Rather ,it is something more insidius - it is about how everyday bureaucratic intertia costs money and lives. Think Free reports:
Hanczyk is a 45-year-old flight attendant who lives outside Toronto. Canadian doctors found a tumor in her breast. The problem arises, however, in determining whether chemotherapy is necessary.
When faced with small, estrogen-receptor-positive tumors, with lymph nodes free of cancer, chemotherapy is beneficial to only a few. The trick is in determining who they are.
While the tumors look the same under a microscope, a test - the Oncotype DX test - can determine if the cancer is likely to return within the next decade by analyzing 21 genes. Without the test, women must make a choice: undergo chemotherapy, with its possible side effects of leukemia, neurological damage, infertility and premature menopause, or risk a recurrence in the next decade.
Herein lies the problem. Government bureaucracies move at a snail’s pace and are certainly ill-suited when it comes to working in the fast-paced world of personalized medicine. Here in the United States, most insurance companies and Medicare will fund the test. The decision makes sense because the test is cheaper than chemotherapy. In fact, an estimated $100 million was saved last year in the United States because some 50,000 women took the test, according to the U.S. National Institutes of Health.
In Canada, however, the health care bureaucracy has yet to approve funding for the test, and any such approval, if it comes, is at least a year away, which is bad news for the estimated 12,000 Canadian women, such as Hanczyk, who need the test every year.
Hanczyk, who watched her mother slowly die under chemotherapy, decided not to be a slave to a sluggish medical bureaucracy. In September, she paid $3,776 to have a chunk of her tumor sent from Toronto to California and be tested.