Tax Reform ATR believes that all consumed income should be taxed one time, at one low and flat rate. Link
#Obamacare's 10% tanning tax hits salon owners and customers, most of which are women: http://t.co/dJuaGAT9LE
taxreformer
Groups who advocated for the IRS to prepare tax returns sure look foolish these days: http://t.co/oKvpIofu7Y
taxreformer
"We don't need the federal government mandating additional taxes..." -@MarshaBlackburn on MFA: http://t.co/lAuLJtr5t3 #NoNetTax
taxreformer
Health insurers and businesses are already feeling the iron-clad grip of regulations in #Obamacare: http://t.co/J6dfnKqFYZ
taxreformer
Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell Signs Largest Tax Hike in Virginia History into Law http://t.co/Qd6KOFfaPv
taxreformer
Under #Obamacare, mothers have had a tougher time purchasing non-prescription, over-the-counter medicine: http://t.co/dJuaGAT9LE
taxreformer
9 out of 20 #Obamacare tax hikes have not even been implemented yet: http://t.co/opFkyf1guJ
taxreformer
.@GroverNorquist on MFA: "[The Senate] didn't ask all of the questions that needed to be asked": http://t.co/wXfkIR2Ca9 #NoNetTax
taxreformer
"When architects of #Obamacare are worried about it creating a trainwreck, you know something's gone terribly wrong": http://t.co/J6dfnKqFYZ
taxreformer
Conservative and Free Market Groups Applaud Move to Delay a Vote on Gina McCarthy: http://t.co/lNQYmJAB12 #EPA
taxreformer
An article written by Caitlin McDevitt in Monday’s Washington Post explains that Senate Democrats have decided to scrap their highly ridiculed cosmetic-surgery tax, also known as the "bo-tax." Desperate to find another revenue source that is perhaps less susceptible to mockery, Democrats have decided on a tanning "sin tax." The tanning tax is one of the seven tax hikes in the Senate healthcare bill that violate President Obama’s "firm pledge" not to raise "any form" of taxes on families making less than $250,000.
McDevitt explains that, "the Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that, under the new proposal, taxable revenue from tanning salons will remain steady or rise slightly year over year for the next decade." However, history shows that the tax hike will only decrease demand and will fail to meet revenue claims. Not to mention, with the increasing popularity of spray-on tans and the tanning salon industry already suffering, it is highly unlikely that the tax will generate the $2.7 billion that is suggested. Senate Democrats fail to realize that this new tax, like all taxes, will only drive consumers to find an alternative.
Americans for Tax Reform has repeatedly pointed out how sin taxes only decrease government revenue, and are in fact a "placeholder" for future income taxes, etc. A simple explanation as to why sin taxes are ineffective can be found here and here.