Will Upton

In Washington State, Tax Hikes Are Not the Solution

Posted by Will Upton on Friday, May 6th, 2011, 4:08 PM PERMALINK

State Senators in Washington State are looking to hike taxes on farmers and small businesses in an effort to close the $5.3 billion budget gap created by the state’s spending addiction.  

Three bills are being circulated in the State Senate that would increase taxes by $350 million.  Such an increase on a declining agricultural sector could stifle any economic progress that might be made.  

Currently Washington State has a projected unemployment rate of 9.2%, that’s 320,400 residents without work.  Washington is tied with Alabama and Colorado, ranking 33rd out of the 50 states in the number employed – raising taxes will not help them improve upon this number.  

This is not a revenue problem, as many politicians in the state seem to think, it is a spending problem.  Had Washington State lived within its means and kept spending in line with population and inflation over the last decade, the state would have spent $26.7 billion less than it actually did for that duration – money that could have been put in a rainy day fund or, ideally, returned to taxpayers.

Taxpayers in the Evergreen State, and taxpayers across the nation for that matter, need to remind their state legislators that raising taxes doesn’t solve their state’s economic problems.  Only reductions in taxation and spending will encourage economic growth and prosperity. 

To read ATR’s letter to the Washington State Senate click here.  

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Top Comments

ATR Opposes Oklahoma "Provider Fees"

Posted by Will Upton on Monday, April 25th, 2011, 4:29 PM PERMALINK

Today, Americans for Tax Reform sent a letter to members of the Oklahoma state Senate and the Office of Governor Mary Fallin in strong opposition to Oklahoma HB 1381. 

HB 1381 would lead Oklahoma down a dangerous road that is becoming more-and-more popular amongst fiscally reckless and irresponsible state governments.  Enacting a “provider fee”, HB 1381 would levy a new 2% tax – though that tax rate could rise upwards of 4% – upon hospital revenues in the state. 

The new tax, a $118 million tax hike, would be funneled into a pool that would receive matching funds from the federal government’s Medicaid program.  The pool would then be redistributed to hospitals in Oklahoma.  This is essentially a shell game with taxpayer dollars with Oklahoma politicians cleverly gaming a failing welfare system. 

Despite the argument that the cost of the new tax will not be passed on to consumers because of Medicaid’s matching funds, it must be understood that it is not in the self interest of profit-seeking entities of such great size to incur these fees without passing on at least a portion of the burden to their consumers.

Finally, as ATR has noted in the past, “Giving additional money to states changes their ‘fiscal behavior,’ encouraging them to increase spending and taxes… States receive matching federal funds based on the revenue they collect. This encourages states to increase taxes to generate more revenue to receive more aid… Overall, these aid transfers to states are comparable to the parent who continually gives their spendthrift child more and more money every week. Rather than learning some fiscal restraint, the child continually spends with the assumption he will receive more.”

To read ATR’s letter to the Oklahoma state Senate click here

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Top Comments

Take Action: Stop MD Legislators from Raising Taxes on Alcohol

Posted by Will Upton on Thursday, April 7th, 2011, 1:32 PM PERMALINK

Americans for Tax Reform urges the Maryland House of Delegates to vote against SB 994 – an unprecedented 50 percent hike in the sales tax on alcohol. 

The proposed tax hike would up Maryland’s current 6 percent tax to 9 percent.  Democrats in the state Senate planned for the tax hike to occur over three years with a 1 percent hike each year.   

Revenues generated from the 1 percent hike in the first year would overwhelmingly go to off-set modest cuts made to education aid in Prince George’s County, Allegany County, Garrett County, and to pay for retired teachers’ healthcare in Baltimore.  In the first year, alcohol taxes would be raised by an estimated $30 million – by the third the increase could exceed $85 million.  

“Vice” taxes do not work.  Last year’s cigarette tax hike in Washington, D.C. actually caused revenues to decrease by 20 percent!  Additionally, these taxes hurt small business owners and the poor the most – a new tax hike on alcohol will only further Maryland’s economic stagnation.  

ATR encourages you to write your Maryland House delegate and tell them to vote no on SB 994.  You can write to your delegate here:

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Top Comments

Daily Media Spotlight December 14, 2010

Posted by Will Upton on Tuesday, December 14th, 2010, 4:06 PM PERMALINK

Grover Norquist is in Politico’s ‘Arena’ discussing the minefield that sits between today and the 2012 elections: “Unlike 2006, the only potential presidential candidate who must vote on such compromises is South Dakota’s John Thune. All the other possible Republican candidates, including the new governors in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, etc., are free to oppose such compromises, signaling the (obvious and largely irrelevant ) point that if they were president, such a compromise would have been settled much to the right. True… But not terribly useful in discussing how one constructs the frustrating, but necessary “deals” between now and 2012 when, Republicans expect, the presidency and the Senate majority fall into their hands.”

From Business Wire and The Daily Caller, “The Daily Caller to Co-Host Republican National Committee’s Chairmanship Debate with Americans for Tax Reform on January 3rd.”  Here is Grover’s take on the event:  “‘We are pleased to host this debate with The Daily Caller. The actual vote for RNC Chairman will be made by the 168 members of the Committee, but the impact will be felt by all,’ said Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform. ‘Therefore, every activist should play a role in questioning the candidates and communicating with RNC members who cast votes...just like lobbying your Congressman and Senators.’”

ATR friend and ally Christopher Freind expresses a grave concern in The Philly Post over the prospects that the GOP may not have a viable candidate to challenge and tax-and-spend (and tax some more) Senator Bob Casey in 2012: “You would think that with Pennsylvania’s Republican roots, which have run especially deep over the last several decades, freshman Democratic senator Bob Casey would be vulnerable in 2012… You would be wrong… Incumbents don’t lose unless they’re challenged by viable, first-tier candidates, as the Senate elections in Nevada and Alaska proved…”

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Top Comments

Daily Media Spotlight December 13, 2010

Posted by Will Upton on Monday, December 13th, 2010, 4:29 PM PERMALINK

The Daily Beast says he is, “The One Man Who Can Sink Obama’s Tax Plans.”  When it comes to President Obama’s debt commission proposal, which may raise taxes by $1 trillion, $2 trillion, or $3 trillion depending on who you ask, ATR’s Grover Norquist stands athwart yelling stop!  So does the proposal have a chance? “Not if Grover Norquist has anything to say about it. The longtime face of the GOP’s anti-tax wing has been leading a crusade against the commission’s fragile progress through his group Americans for Tax Reform, and budget experts are openly fretting that he’ll sink their proposals before they get anywhere near Congress.”

Warner Todd Huston has a great post at Publius’ Forum taking on the notion that business extenders are earmarks.  He argues, “Many on the left are saying that the business extenders in the deal are pork, or are an earmark, or are even ‘costing the government.’ Ryan Ellis explains why these claims are incorrect re the business extenders… The first thing he mentions is that business extenders aren't new to this tax deal and that they've been around for a long time… In any case, whatever else is wrong with this idea -- such as the pork that is being added every other hour at this point -- the business extenders are not a detraction here.”

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Top Comments

All Formally Declared Candidates for RNC Chairman Confirmed for January 3 Debate

Posted by Will Upton on Monday, December 13th, 2010, 1:07 PM PERMALINK

All four of the formally declared candidates for the Chairmanship of the Republican National Committee (RNC) have confirmed their participation in the Monday, January 3 debate at the National Press Club.  Hosted by Americans for Tax Reform and The Daily Caller, the debate will begin at 1:00 p.m. ET.

As of today at Noon, the formally declared candidates are Saul Anuzis, Maria Cino, Reince Priebus, and Ann Wagner. 

The event details are as follows:

When:   Monday, January 3, 2011 from 1:00 pm – 2:30 p.m. ET (Doors open at Noon).

Where:  National Press Club (529 14th St. NW), 13th Floor, Ballroom

RSVP Required:  debate@atr.org

Hosted by:  Americans for Tax Reform and The Daily Caller

Additional co-sponsors:  The Susan B. Anthony List

Metro, driving directions, and parking information: Click here

Debate Website:  You are encouraged to submit and vote on questions to be asked during the debate at www.RNCdebate.org

Note: ATR hosted a similar debate on January 5, 2009.  The dedicated website for the event – RNCdebate.org – allowed activists to propose and vote on debate questions.  The site drew 60,000 votes on 925 different questions. 

The C-SPAN coverage of the 2009 debate can be viewed by clicking here.

Top Comments

Daily Media Spotlight December 9, 2010

Posted by Will Upton on Thursday, December 9th, 2010, 3:34 PM PERMALINK

ATR president Grover Norquist asks in Human Events: “Will Taxes Doom Obama In 2012?”  He concludes, “…the 'deal' is a truce, not a peace treaty.  Every part of the 'deal' lasts exactly two years.  All the moving parts of the “deal” will be front and center in the 2012 election.  Nothing has been solved.  Every conflict of vision, of policy, of ideology, has been deferred.  Two years… He put the Democrats weakest issue—taxes—front and center in 2012.  And he has made all the tax cuts temporary so as to minimize their help in bringing down unemployment… Evidently he is now getting strategic advice from the folks who thought up Harriet Miers.”

The Wall Street Journal’s Jonathan Weisman notes, “Tax Proposal Wins Norquist Seal of Approval… With so many Republicans signing Americans for Tax Reform’s ‘no new taxes’ pledge, the judgment of ATR President Grover Norquist matters for the fate of the tax deal cut between Republican congressional leaders and President Barack Obama… And the judgment is, the deal does not raise taxes… ‘We’ve been supportive of it,’ said Ryan Ellis, head of tax policy for Americans for Tax Reform.”

“Estate tax proposal draws fire from conservatives who want full repeal,” is the headline of Russell Berman’s piece in The Hill, “Americans for Tax Reform, the group run by conservative activist Grover Norquist, is supporting the overall Obama-GOP agreement and does not consider the estate-tax provision a tax hike… ‘It’s not a tax increase relative to 2011 in current law,’ Ellis said. He added that like most conservatives, Americans for Tax Reform supports ending the estate tax permanently. Of the broader tax package Republicans are signing onto, Ellis said Americans for Tax Reform is ‘very supportive of it.’… ‘It is not perfect, but it is pretty damn good, and we like it,’ Ellis said.”

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Top Comments

Daily Media Spotlight December 7, 2010

Posted by Will Upton on Tuesday, December 7th, 2010, 5:07 PM PERMALINK

Get to know Grover in The Harvard Crimson’s “15 Questions with Grover G. Norquist.”  Some highlights:  “Bush turned around and spent too much, and Obama turned around and said, ‘All those stupid things Bush is doing, we’re going to do 10 times that much.’ So he did stupid on steroids… I want to drop the government in half over the next 25 years, and then drop it in half again. The government’s about 33 percent of GDP, 33 percent of the economy. We want to take it down to 16 and a half percent, then take it down to eight percent, all of which would take us to where we were at the turn of the century.”  

ATR’s own Mattie Corrao is in The Daily Caller proposing a mandated wait period before voting on legislation: “One proposal that is listed in the pledge is a waiting period for legislation, one of the fourteen ways Americans for Tax Reform has suggested the government reduce spending… Putting pending legislation online serves as a warning to policymakers that taxpayers are watching…and reading to see what Congress thinks they can get past the American public.”

In The Wall Street Journal Grover Norquist points out the highs and lows of President Obama’s new tax proposal: “‘The good news is that taxes won’t be increasing on January 1. The bad news is that the uncertainty is simply moved forward two years,’ Grover Norquist, head of Americans for Tax Reform, said in an email to Washington Wire. His group’s website features a ‘Countdown to the Biggest Tax Increase in American History.’ ‘Okay, businessmen and women of America: make long term plans with this uncertainty,’ Mr. Norquist wrote.”

Is putting off the tax debate until 2012 really that smart for Democrats?  The Washington Post’s Jennifer Rubin asks ATR’s tax policy director Ryan Ellis: “To say that Republicans are triumphant would be an understatement. They won the philosophical point (tax hikes impede economic growth) and, candidly, are more than delighted to have a repeat of this debate for the presidential campaign in 2012. Ryan Ellis of Americans for Tax Reform, which strenuously pushed for extension of the Bush tax cuts, tells me, ‘If 2012 is a referendum on Obamacare and tax hikes, we win.’ Well, there will be lots of other issues, and 2012 in political terms is a long way off. Still, I see his point.”

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Top Comments

Daily Media Spotlight December 6, 2010

Posted by Will Upton on Monday, December 6th, 2010, 4:56 PM PERMALINK

Grover Norquist and Rep. Joe Barton argue for controlling spending to reign in and balance the budget in Roll Call.  “Memo to the 112th Congress: Want to fix what’s wrong? It’s really simple and really difficult: Spend less, balance the budget, grow more… The true cost of government to the American people is the total amount of spending. And the only way to reduce total government spending is to do less of it, starting soon… Want to put things right in America again? Get control of government spending, balance the federal budget and restart the economic growth.”

Billy Gribbin, a federal affairs associate at Americans for Tax Reform is in The Daily Caller, “GIPSA chief is finger lickin’ bad…A trial lawyer, Mr. [J. Dudley] Butler is now serving as the Administrator of the Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA), an agency of the USDA tasked with regulating the trade of poultry, livestock, and other agricultural products… Butler took the lead in… whittling down the evidence required to establish that “undue preference” has been shown by meat companies in buying from one small producer or another. This translates into an easier and more profitable job for the plaintiff’s attorneys … The cost of fighting and protecting against such suits will inevitably be passed down to the consumer. J. Dudley Butler operates under what is fast becoming the watchword of the Obama administration: if you can’t beat ’em, regulate ’em.”

ATR friend and ally Chris Freind appears in The Philly Post announcing that “Marcellus Shale Is Not An NBA Player… It's the key to Pennsylvania's future.” Freind continues, “If lame duck Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell and his protégé, failed gubernatorial candidate Dan Onorato, had their way, the Marcellus Shale industry would have died before ever getting off the ground. Those politicians wanted to impose a severance (extraction) tax on natural gas, as high as ten percent… Thankfully, Governor-elect Tom Corbett, with a No-New-Tax promise being the cornerstone of his campaign, trounced Onorato. In doing so, he slammed the door shut on the catastrophic failure that will forever be known as the Rendell Legacy, and opened a portal to opportunity not seen in Pennsylvania for generations.”

More government intrusion? ATR’s Patrick Gleason explains in The Daily Caller, “Fed up Americans recently united in telling the government not to touch their collective junk and the message appears to be getting through, at least somewhat, as the Transportation Security Administration is reportedly reevaluating the new enhanced pat-down procedure in response to public outcry. But the TSA’s taxpayer-funded grope-a-thon is not the only unpopular policy that received public rebuke last month… One of the most exemplary and least discussed manifestations of this sentiment on election night was voter backlash against soda taxes and the lawmakers who voted for them… A clear trend has emerged and soda taxes have become a prominent example of the public’s disdain for unnecessary government intrusion in their lives and livelihoods. After last month it should be clear to all incumbent and incoming lawmakers that soda taxes are bad policy, bad politics, and should be quickly dismissed.”

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Top Comments