Paul Blair

The Internet Sales Tax Vote Breakdown: A Republican Generation Gap

Posted by Paul Blair on Thursday, May 9th, 2013, 2:56 PM PERMALINK

This week the US Senate passed the improperly named Marketplace “Fairness” Act (MFA), a national sales tax scheme that lets tax-me-more states like California and Illinois reach into the pockets of consumers nationwide. By a vote of 69-27, MFA passed and now heads to the House, where it faces a more difficult climb to passage.

Set aside the tremendous burden on small online retailers and numerous other reasons to oppose this onerous legislation, we took a look at the generation gap of those who opposed the bill versus those who voted in favor of it.

Every Republican (seven in total) aged 50 and under voted against the Marketplace Fairness Act.

Twelve of thirteen Republicans who are 55 and under voted against the Marketplace Fairness Act.

Nearly every sub-55 Senator (Thune excluded) voted against the bill. Here are a few of them with some made-up quotes associated with their pictures. 

Jeff Flake: Age 50

“Unpopular? Let’s do a meet and greet, ladies.”

Mike Lee: Age 41

“Let me tell you a bit about defeating incumbent Republicans…”

Tim Scott: Age 47

“Taxes are popular? I got 99.27% of the vote in my first legislative race.”

Ted Cruz: Age 42

“Obama’s in Texas? Maybe he’ll learn something about job creation.”

Marco Rubio: Age 41

“Join the Gang?”

Kelly Ayotte: Age 44

“I beat a guy by the name of Lamontagne.”

Rand Paul: Age 50

“I’d filibuster that…”

And now, some of the Republicans who voted in favor of permitting states to reach across their borders and tax your online purchases…

Lindsey Graham: Age 57

“Federalism? No thanks.”

Jeff Sessions: Age 66

“MFA lets state governments tax across their borders despite legal precedent arguing they cannot? YOLO.”

Mike Enzi: Age 69

“Everyone will now be subject to 9,600 highly variable state and local tax codes. Sounds great!”

Thad Cochran: Age 75

“The thousands of new businesses and tax authorities handling your personal information will definitely not lose it ever. Trust me.”

John McCain: Age 76

“Lemme see that online purchase order. Arggg!”

No, none of the above quotes are genuine and I made them all up. Relax. But the fact remains – the young freedom fighters nearly all opposed the Marketplace Fairness Act. There certainly were older Republicans who opposed the bill as well and fortunately more Republicans voted against MFA than voted for it.

Regardless, if you’re ready to ramp up the fight in the House, sign our petition to your Congressman by visiting now!

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Special Election for Virginia's House of Delegates 19th District: Find out where to vote!

Posted by Paul Blair on Monday, May 6th, 2013, 6:00 PM PERMALINK

Tomorrow, May 7th, Virginia’s 19th House District will host a Firehouse Primary to replace retiring incumbent Delegate Lacey Putney. Putney, who served for more than five decades in the House of Delegates, chaired the powerful Appropriations Committee in the legislature.

Of the four candidates running to secure the Republican nomination, only one has signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge, making a written commitment to Virginia taxpayers to oppose any and all tax hikes. Zach Martin put his no-new-taxes rhetoric in writing so that voters know that he stands firm on the promise. 

There will be three polling locations open throughout the district. Registered voters may vote in the location specific to their locality. Voting will be done on electronic voting machines and the polling locations will be open from 6pm to 9pm. Voters may arrive and vote at any time during that three hour window.

Botetourt County Voting Location
Lord Botetourt High School

1435 Roanoke Road, Daleville, VA 24083

Bedford City/County Voting Location
Thaxton Community Center, across the street from Thaxton Elementry School

3821 Monorail Circle Thaxton VA, 24174

Alleghany County Voting Location
The Old Alleghany County Board of Supervisors Board Meeting Room

110 Roesdale Ave, Covington, VA 24426

To find out if you’re a registered voter in the 19th House District, click here.



More from Americans for Tax Reform

Taxpayer Group to Maine Legislature: Reject The Gang of Eleven's Massive Tax Hike

Posted by Paul Blair on Friday, May 3rd, 2013, 1:43 PM PERMALINK

This week, a so-called “Gang of Eleven” unveiled legislation in Maine that amounts to a $700 million tax hike. Americans for Tax Reform President Grover Norquist today sent a letter to the state legislature and Governor LePage urging them to reject the bill if it is not amended to be revenue neutral. LD 1496, the “Act to Modernize and Simplify the Tax Code” increases the tax burden on Mainers, which outweighs the benefits of cutting the income and corporate tax rates.

The letter, which can be read below, outlines the negative consequences of the bill and explains that voting for the bill would be a clear violation of the Pledge to oppose any and all tax hikes that many legislators made to Maine taxpayers, including Governor LePage.  

I write today in strong opposition to LD 1496, the “Gang of Eleven” tax code rewrite. Put simply, the “Act to Modernize and Simplify the Tax Code” is a massive tax increase. Contrary to claims of those advocating for the bill, raising the overall tax burden on Mainers outweighs the benefits associated with income and corporate tax cuts.

This bill expands the sales tax base to dozens of new goods and services, increases the sales tax rate by a full point, eliminates income tax deductions, and raises the cigarette tax to a rate more than double that of neighboring New Hampshire. Many of the products and services that will face higher taxes are provided by small businesses, which are disproportionately harmed by this tax hike. Tax reform must be revenue neutral. A vote in favor of this legislation, as written, is a violation of the Taxpayer Protection Pledge.

If the goal of the legislature is to reform the tax code and make the state more attractive to job creators, that goal should be accomplished without increasing the state’s overall tax burden.

Simplifying the tax code is an admirable goal, and one that state legislatures nationwide are working to accomplish. I applaud the 50 percent reduction in income taxes, elimination of the death tax, and a reduction of the corporate income tax. These efforts, considered separately, are legitimate tax reforms that would encourage economic growth, investment, and job creation, by reducing the burden of government on the backs of taxpayers.

These tax reductions, however, are outweighed by hundreds of millions of dollars of tax hikes. This bill is a $700 million tax increase. Tax increases are not tax reform.

I urge you to oppose this tax increase, and tackle true tax reform that reduces marginal rates without increasing the size of state government.

If you have any questions about ATR’s position on this issue, please contact state affairs manager Josh Culling at 202-785-0266.


            Grover G. Norquist

            President, Americans for Tax Reform

[PDF of the Letter to the Maine Legislature and Governor Paul LePage]

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Pete Snyder Signs the Taxpayer Protection Pledge

Posted by Paul Blair on Wednesday, May 1st, 2013, 3:42 PM PERMALINK

Virginia entrepreneur Pete Snyder has signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge in his bid for the Republican nomination as Lieutenant Governor of Virginia. The Pledge, sponsored by Americans for Tax Reform, commits signers to oppose any and all efforts to increase taxes.

Americans for Tax Reform offers the Pledge to all candidates for state and federal office. Fourteen governors and over 1,000 state legislators have signed the Pledge. To date, six of seven Republican candidates for Lt. Governor have signed the Pledge. Pete Snyder joins Minister and veteran E.W. Jackson, Delegate Scott Lingamfelter, State Senator Steve Martin, Prince William County Chair Corey Stewart, and Stafford County Board Chair Susan Stimpson as signers of the Pledge to Virginia taxpayers.

Pete Snyder signing the Pledge to Virginia taxpayers, putting his commitment to oppose higher taxes in writing.

The only candidate who refuses to put in writing her opposition to higher taxes is former Virginia state legislator Jeannemarie Devolites Davis.

Before the state Convention, ATR will publish a more detailed evaluation of each Republican candidate’s record and positions on taxes and government spending.   

“I want to congratulate Pete Snyder for taking the Taxpayer Protection Pledge. Virginians deserve better than tax-and-spend policies that fall hard on the backs of hardworking families and small businesses. They want real solutions that create jobs, cut government spending, and incentivize more economic growth,” said Grover Norquist, president of ATR.

“By signing the Pledge, Pete Snyder has demonstrated that he understands the problems of hard-working taxpayers in Virginia.”

“By refusing to put in writing her opposition to higher taxes, Jeannemarie Devolites Davis is signaling that she’ll team up with Virginia Democrats for a higher tax and spend agenda that grows government and increases the burden of state spending on taxpayers. This is not new for Davis who was a prominent tax-hiker in the state legislature,” Norquist continued.


More from Americans for Tax Reform

NEW REPORT: Obama Has Spent 3.6% of His Total Work Time in Economic Meetings or Briefings

Posted by Paul Blair on Monday, April 29th, 2013, 3:24 PM PERMALINK

A new report published by the nonpartisan Government Accountability Institute (GAI) examined the president’s 1,532 days in office to figure out exactly how he spends his time. For those struggling to find work, the results may not be surprising.

From the report:

Key Findings:

• President Obama has spent 3.6 % of his total work time in economic meetings or briefings of any kind (assuming a six day, 10-hour a-day workweek) throughout his presidency

• President Obama has spent a total of 474.4 hours (or 47.4 10-hour workdays) in economic meetings or briefings of any kind throughout his presidency

• In 2013, President Obama has spent 6 total hours in economic meetings of any kind

• The number of days with some sort of economic meeting have declined significantly throughout President Obama’s time in office. Throughout 2009, President Obama had 140 days with economic meetings. By 2012, the number of days with a scheduled economic meeting decreased to 29 (an 79 % decrease)

• Throughout his time in office, President Obama has played 115 total rounds of golf and spent 86 days on vacation, for an estimated combined total of 976 hours

Sure, being the President has got to be a stressful job. Think, however, about your last four years. How have they stacked up? Have you had time to play 115 rounds of golf or take 86 days of vacation?

A Few Economic Facts:

  • 11.6 million people are unemployed, for a rate of 7.6%
  • The number of long-term unemployed (for +27 weeks) is 4.6 million people
  • The long-term unemployed account for nearly 40% of all unemployed
  • 663,000 dropped out of the workforce last month
  • The participation rate in the economy is the lowest since 1979
  • 23 million households in the United States are on food stamps, that’s 1 in 5
  • More people are on food stamps in America than live in Spain: 47,692,896


Understanding that the President is spending less and less time on the economy is disheartening. To accept that there isn’t much more work to do is unacceptable.

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Missouri Legislator Wants to Ban Seersucker Suits. Photo-Evidence Suggests That's A Bad Move

Posted by Paul Blair on Friday, April 26th, 2013, 3:02 PM PERMALINK

That’s right. A Democrat state senator from Missouri recently offered an amendment to a higher education funding bill to ban seersuckers for those above the age of 8.

He stated: “any person living in this state aged 8 and under may wear seersucker suits at their leisure.” The kids appreciate it. He went on, “Any person over the age of 8 living in this state may not wear seersucker suits because adults look ridiculous in seersucker suits…”

It was only a year ago when the US Senate killed Seersucker Thursday, a tradition created by former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott.

The Washington Post had a good writeup on the matter last June:

For much of our history, lawmakers lived in Washington for uninterrupted weeks at a time. Democrats and Republicans moved their families to Washington and socialized at card games or Georgetown salons. These interactions made rivals less likely to demonize each other in their official business and more likely to reach agreement. “It’s harder to give somebody a real hard time when you were out with them and their spouse the night before,” Lott reasons.

Now lawmakers disparage such clubby ways. They’ve given themselves virtually unlimited travel allowances, so they can leave their families in their home states and fly to Washington for three-day workweeks that leave no time to create personal bonds. It’s no coincidence that this change brought along with it stalemate and division over the nation’s wars and finances.

Photos rebut wild claims better than the written word. Here are pictures of people wearing seersucker suits. You decide if the Missouri Democrat was correct in claiming that these people look “ridiculous.”


Senator Trent Lott

Seersucker Thursday 2011

Seersucker Thursday 2006

Senator Trent Lott

Seersucker Thursday 2004

Gregory Peck in To Kill a Mockingbird

At the very least, seersucker suits provide for great bipartisan photo-ops.

More from Americans for Tax Reform

Top Five Reasons to Oppose Marketplace Fairness Act With GIFs

Posted by Paul Blair on Thursday, April 25th, 2013, 3:59 PM PERMALINK

The internet sales tax mandate would be a major change in the way businesses operate especially around tax season. At the end of each year businesses are responsible for paying sales tax. They can choose to tax their customers at the point of sale or pay out what they owe in sales tax at the end of the year. Businesses therefore act as a tax collection arm for the state in which they do business. The internet sales tax mandate would force businesses to become sales tax collectors for all states.

So, here are the Top Five Reasons to Oppose the Marketplace Fairness Act:

  • Threatens Privacy - Business and state revenue boards with a track record of losing private information will have more chances to do so. Like this unsuspecting cat, you're not safe.

  • Slippery Slope - Opens the door for further government intervention in the internet and for states to reach across their borders for other taxes.

  • Too Confusing - Small businesses would be forced to accommodate over 9,000 highly variable state and local tax codes and be required to settle disputes with out of state revenue boards in out of state courts.

  • Discourages Tax Competition - Rather than competing to lower taxes and attract businesses, states will compete to raise taxes on residents of other states. This will be you.

  • Expands State Tax Authority - State Governments will be able to tax across their borders despite clear legal and judicial precedentarguing otherwise. Money Hungry States Like California and Illinois Will Come After You. You're the duck.

Essentially, if the Marketplace Fairness Act passes, this will be you:

Join our effort to prevent this from happening by clicking here: and signing our petition to tell Congress NO on a federal internet tax.

More from Americans for Tax Reform

With Return of Twinkies, Union Thugs May Rue the Day

Posted by Paul Blair on Thursday, April 25th, 2013, 2:21 PM PERMALINK

The Wall Street Journal has the scoop:

Chief Executive C. Dean Metropoulos said the company will pump $60 million in capital investments into the plants between now and September and aims to hire at least 1,500 workers. But they won't be represented by unions, including the one whose nationwide strike sparked the 86-year-old company's decision to shut down in November.

"We do not expect to be involved in the union going forward," Mr. Metropoulos said in an interview Wednesday.

If you recall, Hostess declared bankruptcy and had to liquidate thanks to a union debacle. The bakery union refused to accept concessions that would allow the company to stay open. Instead of accepting modest wage cuts, the union thugs representing Hostess bakers picked no jobs over paying-but-not-high-enough-for-union-pleasure-ones.

Math seemed hard. Faced with the fact that the company had lost over $300 million in 2012, the bakery union cared little for the simple truth that a company that doesn’t make a profit ceases to exist.

The result? Hostess Brands Inc. filed for bankruptcy, sold off its brands, and more than 18,000 jobs, 15,000 of which were union jobs, were nearly lost for good.

Since then, the unions insisted that under any sort of restructuring and reopening of bakeries, union employees would be the only ones that could be hired. New management disagrees.

Mr. Metropoulos and his son, Daren, the co-CEO of Pabst Brewing Co. who is also heading up the reborn Hostess's marketing strategy, expressed confidence they would be able to find skilled, nonunion workers near the four plants, which are in areas with high unemployment.

"We're trying to find the most qualified people in these local markets to come work for the company," Daren Metropoulos said.

If you’re looking for work and have some baking experience, the new Hostess plants are opening in Columbus, Georgia; Emporia, Kansas; Schiller Park, Illinois; and Indianapolis, Indiana.

More from Americans for Tax Reform

One Year Anniversary of US Having Highest Corporate Tax Rate in Developed World

Posted by Paul Blair on Monday, April 1st, 2013, 12:17 PM PERMALINK

The distinction is bestowed upon us thanks to a federal and state integrated rate of 39.2 percent.

For perspective, the average rate in the developed world (OECD) is only 25 percent. Our six major trading partners – Canada, Mexico, the United Kingdom, Japan, Germany, and France – all have a lower corporate rate than we do. As a result, capital and jobs continue to flow overseas, rather than staying here to create jobs, increase wages, fund pensions, invest in new business, or grow nest eggs.


Thanks, Mr. President, for a number one ranking that no one is happy about.

Reducing the corporate tax rate is about more than remaining competitive with our major trading partners. Reducing the rate from 39.2 to the average rate of 25 percent would create more than 580,000 jobs annually over the next decade. According to the Milken Institute, such a policy shift would boost GDP by 2.2 percent. For President Obama, whose recovery has been the worst of any recovery since World War II, this should be easy. 

This is about more than economic growth for the national economy. American families would also benefit. According to the Heritage Foundation, A typical family of four's after-tax income would rise on average by $2,484 per year with a 25 percent corporate tax rate.

More from Americans for Tax Reform

As Governor O'Malley Comes to South Carolina, His Liberal Record Follows

Posted by Paul Blair on Friday, March 22nd, 2013, 2:24 PM PERMALINK

Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley will keynote a Democrat Party conference this weekend in Charleston, in the midst of his state legislature’s 90-day session.  The trip to South Carolina further fuels the narrative that he’s running for his party’s nomination for 2016. The visit also provides an opportunity to briefly compare the northern governor’s record to that of Governor Nikki Haley’s.

On Tax Reform/Relief:

Governor Haley: signed millions of dollars of tax relief into law, helping make South Carolina a more business-friendly state. She also pursued tax reform on a number of occasions. Most recently, as ATR noted, Haley used her State of the State address to call for eliminating the state’s top income tax bracket. Haley has also said that she would like to see the state’s corporate and individual income taxes phased out and eventually eliminated.

Governor O’Malley: has consistently straddled taxpayers in the Old Line state with higher bills and fees. In fact, in an exhaustive examination, ATR found that O’Malley raised taxes and fees a whopping 19 times, accounting for $2.2 billion dollars. O’Malley has raised taxes on everything from alcohol to smokeless tobacco to the infamous “millionaires tax”, which seems to have caused a mass exodus of the state’s most successful individuals. He most recently proposed an $830 million dollar gas tax hike ($3.4 billion over 5 years).

Pension Reform/State Employees:

Governor Haley: has been a stalwart when it comes to saving taxpayer dollars. Recently, she created a stir among state bureaucrats when she asked them to contribute a small amount more for their taxpayer-funded benefits. Furthermore, in the previous legislative session, the Governor signed a sweeping pension reform bill into law which, according to Moody’s Investor Service, would reduce the state’s long term unfunded pension liability by over $2 billion dollars.

Governor O’Malley: has presided over a system in Maryland which veers the state in the direction of a fiscal train wreck. According to a report by the Pew Center on the States, Maryland’s unfunded pension liability has increased from $11 billion to around $19 billion in the past few years, rendering any previous attempts at pension reform obsolete. The fund’s assets will cover only 65% of its obligations. In spite of this, O’Malley has presided over a retirement fund that pays exuberant fees to Wall Street investors (with questionable return) at the expense of hard-working taxpayers. 

Given the facts, one can see that the differences between the governors are more than just regional. Gov. Haley has consistently put the taxpayers first, whereas O’Malley has consistently viewed their interest as his lowest priority, using their hard earned dollars to fund higher and higher spending.

More from Americans for Tax Reform