Taxpayer Protection Pledge
ATR's Congressional Ratings
An American Agenda: Vote for Your Priorities
Invite Grover Norquist to Speak at Your School or Event
Welcome to Pacific Rim Policy Exchange 2010
INDEX

ATRF Analysis: Limit Earning Stripping by Expatriated Entities

From Tim Andrews on Wednesday, February 24, 2010 4:17 PM
Add to Reddit Add to Stumbleupon Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Twitter

This is part of a series of posts analyzing proposed changes to the U.S. international tax system. For the rest of the series, please click here.

Current Law

Under current law, a debt-to equity ‘safe harbor’ provision (of up to 50%) exists to protect companies. This is a provision that reduces or eliminates a company’s liability and protects them from IRS action, provided they act in good faith. If you stay within the ‘safe harbor’, you will not be pursued by the IRS. Furthermore, disallowed interest expenses may be carried forward for deductions in subsequent years, and the corporations’ excess limitation for a tax year may also be carried forward to the three subsequent years.

The ‘safe harbor’ provision has two parts. Firstly, you must have a debt to equity ratio of less than 1.5 to 1. Secondly, you must have a net interest expense less than 50% of adjusted taxable income. If you are not within the safe harbor, the IRS assumes you are trying to shift income, and will deny deductions for interest. This has the effect of limiting the interest that can be deducted by a company.
 
Proposed Change
This proposal would eliminate the debt-to equity safe harbor, and would reduce the 50% adjusted taxable income threshold to 25%. The carryforward for ‘disallowed interest’ would be limited to 10 years, and the carryforward of excess limitation would be eliminated. This would significantly further limit the interest that can be deducted by a company.
 
ATRF Analysis
If enacted, this proposal would have two effects on top of raising the overall tax burden on businesses: 1)it would put the IRS in a position of determining how much debt/equity a company can hold, and 2)would interfere in the relationship between a stockholder and a company.
 
The effect of this would be to significantly punish debt-financing as opposed to share-financing, and in doing so significantly interferes with a business’s ability to choose how to finance projects. This also significantly limits the ability of a company to pay interest to the owner/stockholders.
 
If passed, this would significantly interfere with fundamental business decisions made by a company.
 
10-year Revenue Estimate:
U.S. Department of Treasury: $1.2 billion
Joint Committee on Taxation: $1.25 billion
 
Click here to view as a PDF.

Permalink | Email | Print

Add a Comment



68498

Add me to the ATR Newsletter list (If you are already on the list, you will not be subscribed a second time.)
Notify me when others comment on this article.