INDEX
- Vote 'NO!' to Government Regulation of Privacy at The Economist
- FCC Stalls on Internet Regulation; Asks for More Comments
- Why was the Volcker Commission Constrained by Obama’s Tax Pledge, but not the Simpson-Bowles?
- Daily Media Spotlight September 2, 2010
- Harry Reid Looks to Resurrect RES During Lame-Duck
- Calculating the Cost of Government (CFA Site »)
Thursday, September 2, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight September 1, 2010
-
Obama Tax Commission Report:
Baby Step Toward IRS Tax Preparation - Dina Titus Launches False Attack Ad on Joe Heck and the Taxpayer Protection Pledge
- Indiana LaunchesTransparency Website (CFA Site »)
- Rally for Jobs Kicks Off Today in Texas
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 31, 2010
- Let us All Join in on the NOT so “Green Cause”
- California Bag Ban Bill Up for Vote Today
- Norquist to Gov. Pat Quinn: Pick a Flawed Income Tax Hike and Stick With It
- Phil Moffett Signs Taxpayer Protection Pledge in Kentucky Gubernatorial Race
- New Mexico Sets Trends in Transparency Websites (CFA Site »)
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
- Robert Gibbs’s Fuzzy Tax Hike Math
- Daily Media Spotlight August 30, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
- 2011 Could Be Ugly for Nevada Taxpayers
- Lame Duck Governor Ed Rendell Not Going Gently Into That Good Night – New Call for Higher Taxes
- Happy Cost of Government Day, California
- Bay Staters Spent 239 Days Paying for Government Burdens in 2010 (CFA Site »)
- Washington Welcomes Cost of Government Day (CFA Site »)
Friday, August 27, 2010
- Spill Commission Should Lift Moratorium Which Has Cost Gulf Residents 12,000 Jobs and $2.1 Billion
- Daily Media Spotlight August 26, 2010
- Why is Dan Onorato Knowingly Misleading Pennsylvania Voters?
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle
- Utah Tobacco Sellers Feeling the Impact of Tax Hikes
Thursday, August 26, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 25, 2010
- WI Democrats Launch “Blatantly False” Attack on Sean Duffy
- Unions plan on spending big this election cycle (AWF Site »)
- Philly's New Blog Tax May Foreshadow Other eTaxes
- BNA: For 14 States, Existing Tax Code Leaves Room for Etax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Philly's $300 Blogger Tax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Cost of Government Day Arrives in the Commonwealth
- Pennsylvania Finally Celebrates Cost of Government Day
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
- California Budget Proposal Advocates eTax (Stop eTaxes Site »)
- Daily Media Spotlight August 24, 2010
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 23, 2010
- Government Workers' Pensions are Underfunded by $3 Trillion
Monday, August 23, 2010
- Fourteen Ways to Reduce Government Spending
- FCC Report on Broadband Performance: A Scare Tactic
- Sen. Al Franken Doesn’t Understand Wireless Networks...or the First Amendment
Friday, August 20, 2010
- Daily Media Spotlight August 19, 2010
Thursday, August 19, 2010
ATRF Analysis: Defer Deduction of Expenses, Except R&E Expenses, Related to Deferred Income
From Tim Andrews on Monday, December 7, 2009 1:27 PMToday, Americans for Tax Reform Foundation has released Part 2 of it's series analyzing Administration Proposals to "Reform" the U.S. International Tax System:
Defer Deduction of Expenses, Except R&E Expenses, Related to Deferred Income
Current Law
Taxpayers are able to deduct ordinary and necessary expenses incurred in carrying on business, both inside and outside the United States.
Proposed Change
This proposal will ‘defer’ deductions for all non research & development expenses, so that they cannot be claimed until the profits are ‘repatriated’ to the U.S.
ATR Analysis
The current tax-deduction rules stimulate investment and encourage economic growth. By forcing a ‘deferral’, and effectively forbidding taxpayers to deduct their expenses, the time-value of this money falls, and businesses will lose a significant percentage of allowable deductions.
For instance: Assuming a conservative inflation rate of 3-4% annually, deferral for only five years would wipe 20% off the value of the deduction. This does not even account for the problems attributed to the fact that the money could be better spent on opportunities presently – particularly in the current financial economic downturn when generating investment is critical.
For instance: Assuming a conservative inflation rate of 3-4% annually, deferral for only five years would wipe 20% off the value of the deduction. This does not even account for the problems attributed to the fact that the money could be better spent on opportunities presently – particularly in the current financial economic downturn when generating investment is critical.
For many taxpayers, this ‘deferral’ may mean they will never realize the deductions they are legally entitled to: Deduction delayed is deduction denied.
This proposal will burden business and hurt investment. It will cut company revenue, and lead to downsizing back at home, meaning slower economic growth and job losses at home.
10-year Revenue Estimate:
U.S. Department of Treasury: 60.1 billion
Joint Committee on Taxation: 51.5 billion
Joint Committee on Taxation: 51.5 billion














Add a Comment